Personality is of great lay, clinical, and research interest with important functional implications. The field has largely settled on five- or six-factor models as being largely sufficient for descriptive purposes, at least in W.E.I.R.D settings and, as such, numerous measures have been created of varying length and breadth. For a number of reasons, however, super-short forms have come to be quite popular in research endeavors with a number created in the past 20 years. The goal of the present study was to compare the time with completion and general psychometric properties of these measures, as well as examine their convergence with one another and with longer measures in an online community sample (N = 494). Generally, the psychometric properties of the measures varied considerably in terms of internal consistency and convergence with one another. The brief measures demonstrated mostly adequately convergence with longer measures. Despite this convergence, longer measures were found to contain considerably more variance that was not accounted for by brief measures. We consider the advantages and disadvantages of these measures and suggest that longer measures be prioritized whenever possible.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
AshtonM. C.JacksonD. N.PaunonenS. V.HelmesE.RothsteinM. G. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(4), 432-442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1995.1025
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
4.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2020). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure—and why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, 34(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242
BouchardG.LussierY.SabourinS. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.2307/353567
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
9.
CredéM.HarmsP.NiehorsterS.Gaye-ValentineA. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403
10.
CroweM. L.LynamD. R.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464
11.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
12.
DeYoungC. G.GraziopleneR. G.PetersonJ. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003
13.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880-896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03713-000
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FmytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg University Press.
20.
GoldbergL. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivation of Big-Five factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69(5), 709-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.695161
21.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
22.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
23.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
24.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
25.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
26.
JonesS. E.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004
27.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.BagbyR. M.BrownT. A.CarpenterW. T.CaspiA.ClarkL. A.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.GoldbergD.HasinD.HymanS. E.IvanovaM. Y.LynamD. R.MarkonK.. . . ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454-477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
28.
LaheyB. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309
29.
LuchettiM.BarkleyJ. M.StephanY.TerraccianoA.SutinA. R. (2014). Five-factor model personality traits and inflammatory markers: New data and a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 50, 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.014
30.
LynamD. R.GaughanE.MillerJ. D.MillerD.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03766-000
31.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
32.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S. (2005). The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-5384-y
33.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S. (2006). The five-factor model of personality and smoking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 36(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.2190/9EP8-17P8-EKG7-66AD
34.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S.BhullarN.RookeS. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004
35.
MaplesJ. L.GuanL.CarterN. T.MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1070-1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000004
36.
MarshallG. N.WortmanC. B.VickersR. R.KusulasJ. W.HervigL. K. (1994). The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.278
37.
McCraeR. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314541857
38.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4(3), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(83)90146-0
39.
McCraeR. R.KurtzJ. E.YamagataS.TerraccianoA. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366253
40.
MillerJ. D.FewL. R.WidigerT. A. (2012). Assessment of personality disorders and related traits: Bridging DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 108-140). Oxford University Press.
41.
MillerJ. D.GaughanE. T.MaplesJ.PriceJ. (2011). A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: Consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18(3), 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411671
42.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.WidigerT.LeukefeldC. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the Five Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy?Journal of Personality, 69(2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00144
43.
Mullins-SweattS. N.JamersonJ. E.SamuelD. B.OlsonD. R.WidigerT. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment, 13(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106286748
44.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
45.
O’BoyleE. H.ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.StoryP. A.WhiteC. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126
PaunonenS. V.AshtonM. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524
48.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
49.
PrinzieP.StamsG. J. J.DekovićM.ReijntjesA. H.BelskyJ. (2009). The relations between parents’ Big Five personality factors and parenting: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015823
50.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
51.
RuizM. A.PincusA. L.SchinkaJ. A. (2008). Externalizing pathology and the Five-Factor Model: A meta-analysis of personality traits associated with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(4), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2008.22.4.365
52.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1326-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
53.
SmithG. T.CombsJ. LPearsonC. M. (2012). Brief instruments and short forms. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 395-409). American Psychological Association.
54.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
55.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.ZapolskiT. C. B. (2009). On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016699
56.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
57.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2019). Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity?Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 444-459. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000586
58.
SutinA. R.StephanY.LuchettiM.ArteseA.OshioA.TerraccianoA. (2016). The five-factor model of personality and physical inactivity: A meta-analysis of 16 samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.001
59.
TerraccianoA.LöckenhoffC. E.ZondermanA. B.FerrucciL.CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). Personality predictors of longevity: Activity, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(6), 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31817b9371
60.
ThielmannI.SpadaroG.BallietD. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
61.
VizeC. E.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2019). Using Bayesian methods to update and expand the meta-analytic evidence of the Five-Factor Model’s relation to antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 67, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.001
62.
VizeC. E.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2020). The “core” of the Dark Triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000386
63.
VizeC. E.MillerJ.D.LynamD.R. (2018). FFM facets and their relations with different forms of antisocial behavior: An expanded meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.04.004
64.
WatsonD.StantonK.KhooS.Ellickson-LarewS.Stasik-O’BrienS. M. (2019). Extraversion and psychopathology: A multilevel hierarchical review. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.04.009
65.
WatsonD.StasikS. M.Ellickson-LarewS.StantonK. (2015). Extraversion and psychopathology: A facet-level analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 432-446. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000051
66.
WatsonD.WeberK.AssenheimerJ. S.ClarkL. A.StraussM. E.McCormickR. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.3
67.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and individual differences, 30(4), 669-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7
68.
WidigerT. A.CregoC. (2019). HiTOP thought disorder, DSM-5 psychoticism, and five factor model openness. Journal of Research in Personality, 80(June), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.04.008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
