A Quantitative Review of the Comprehensiveness of the Five-Factor Model in Relation to Popular Personality Inventories

Abstract

Reports of associations between the five-factor model (FFM) and the scales of popular personality inventories have generated controversy regarding the comprehensiveness of the FFM. The controversy is fueled by a preoccupation with capturing scale variance and differentiating between specific scales, whereas the focus should instead be on whether the FFM captures the common variance and the dimensions that exist in personality constructs. Analyses of published data revealed that the portions of scale variance captured by the FFM (mean = 38%) were substantial when evaluated in relation to the portions of common variance that exist in most personality inventories (mean = 50%). Furthermore, interbattery factor analyses indicated that the factor structures in most personality inventories can be closely replicated using data derived solely from scale associations with the FFM. Exceptions to this finding occurred for only 2 of 28 personality inventories. The findings support the comprehensiveness of the FFM.

Keywords

personality five-factor model factor analysis personality inventories interbattery analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almagor, M. , Tellegen, A. , & Waller, N. G. (1995). The big seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,300-307.

Angleitner, A. , & Ostendorf, F. (1994). Temperament and the big five factors of personality. In C. F. Halverson , G. A. Kohnstamm , & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 69-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Barbaranelli, C. , & Caprara, G. V. (1996). Howmany dimensions to describe personality? A comparison of Cattell, Comrey, and the big five taxonomies of personality traits. European Review of Applied Psychology, 46,15-24.

Ben-Porath, Y. S. , & Waller, N. G. (1992). “Normal” personality inventories in clinical assessment: General requirements and the potential for using the NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4,14-19.

Bernstein, I. H. (1988). Applied multivariate analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Block, J. (1995). A contrarian viewof the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.

Buss, A. H. , & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley Interscience.

Butcher, J. N. , & Rouse, S. V. (1996). Personality: Individual differences and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47,87-111.

Caprara, G. V. , Barbaranelli, C. , Borgogni, L. , & Perugini, M. (1993). The “big five questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15,281-288.

10.

Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1992). Shuffling arrays: Appearances may be deceiving. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 24, 72-77.

11.

Cattell, H.E.P. (1996). The original big five: A historical perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 5-14.

12.

Cattell, R. B. (1995). The fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere. Psychologist, 8, 207-208.

13.

Church, A. T. (1994). Relating the Tellegen and five-factor models of personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 898-909.

14.

Church, A. T. , & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,93-114.

15.

Clark, L. A. (1996). Schedule for maladaptive and adaptive personality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.

16.

Cloninger, C. R. , Przybeck, T. R. , Svrakic, D. M. , & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.

17.

Cloninger, C. R. , & Svrakic, D. M. (1994). Differentiating normal and deviant personality by the seven-factor personality model. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 40-64). New York: Springer.

18.

Cloninger, C. R. , Svrakic, D. M. , & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50,975-990.

19.

Comrey, A. L. , & Lee, H. B. (1994). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Costa, P. T. , Busch, C. M. , Zonderman, A. B. , & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Correlations of MMPI factor scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50,640-650.

21.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,258-265.

22.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO-PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

23.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1990). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4,362-371.

24.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4,5-13.

25.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

26.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1995a). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64,21-50.

27.

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1995b). Solid grounds in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117,216-220.

28.

Costa, P. T. , Zonderman, A. B. , McCrae, R. R. , & Williams, R. B. (1985). Content and comprehensiveness in the MMPI: An item factor analysis in a normal adult sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48,925-933.

29.

Cota, A. A. , Longman, R. S. , Holden, R. R. , Fekken, G. C. , & Xinaris, S. (1993). Interpolating 95th percentile eigenvalues from random data: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53,585-596.

30.

Craig, R. J. , Loheidi, R. A. , Rudolph, B. , Leifer, M. , & Rubin, N. (1998). Relationship between psychological needs and the five-factor model of personality classification. Journal of Research in Personality, 32,519-527.

31.

Cudeck, R. (1982). Methods for estimating between-battery factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 47-68.

32.

Dahlstrom, W. G. , Welsh, G. S. , & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1973). An MMPI handbook (vol. II): Research applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

33.

De Fruyt, F. , & Mervielde, I. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC interest types. Personality and Individual Differences, 23,87-103.

34.

Deniston, W. M. , & Ramanaiah, N. V. (1993). California Psychological Inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Psychological Reports, 73,491-496.

35.

Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R revised manual. Baltimore: John Hopkins University School of Medicine.

36.

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.

37.

Dyce, J. A. , & O’Connor, B. P. (1998). Personality disorders and the five-factor model: A test of facet-level predictions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12,31-45.

38.

Edgington, E. S. (1995). Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker.

39.

Edwards, A. L. (1959). Edwards Personal Preference Schedule manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.

40.

Edwards, L. K. , & Edwards, A. L. (1991). A principal-components analysis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory factor scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60,766-772.

41.

Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.

42.

Finch, J. F. , Panter, A. T. , & Caskie, G.I.L. (1999). Two approaches for identifying shared personality dimensions across methods. Journal of Personality, 67,407-438.

43.

Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303-307.

44.

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.

45.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

46.

Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

47.

Gough, H. G. , & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

48.

Guadagnoli, E. , & Velicer, W. (1991). A comparison of pattern matching indices. Multivariate Behavior Research, 26,323-343.

49.

Guilford, J. S. , Zimmerman, W. S. , & Guilford, J. P. (1976). The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey handbook: Twenty-five years of research and applications. San Diego, CA: Edits.

50.

Hahn, R. , & Comrey, A. L. (1994). Factor analysis of the NEO-PI and the Comrey Personality Scales. Psychological Reports, 75,355-365.

51.

Harkness, A. R. , McNulty, J. L. , & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7,104-114.

52.

Holland, J. L. (1985). Self-directed search—1985 edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

53.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.

54.

Hyer, L. , Brawell, L. , Albrecht, B. , Boyd, S. , Boudewyns, P. , & Talbert, S. (1994). Relationship of NEO-PI to personality styles and severity of trauma in chronic PTSD victims. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50,699-707.

55.

Jackson, D. N. (1969). Multimethod factor analysis: A reformulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 259-275.

56.

Jackson, D. N. (1976). Jackson Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

57.

Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual (3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

58.

Jackson, D. N. (1989). Basic Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.

59.

John, O. P. , & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.

60.

Johnson, J. H. , Null, C. , Butcher, J. N. , & Johnson, K. N. (1984). Replicated item factor analysis of the full MMPI. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,105-114.

61.

Lehne, G. K. (1994). The NEO-PI and MCMI in the forensic evaluation of sex offenders. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 175-188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

62.

Levenson, M. R. , Aldwin, C. M. , Bosse, R. , & Spiro, A. (1988). Emotionality and mental health: Longitudinal findings from the normative aging study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97,94-96.

63.

Levin, J. , & Montag, I. (1991). Relationship between the basic personality inventory and the NEO-personality inventory in a nonpatient sample. Psychological Reports, 69,1176-1178.

64.

Longman, R. S. , Cota, A. A. , Holden, R. R. , & Fekken, G. C. (1989). PAM: A double-precision FORTRAN routine for the parallel analysis method in principal components analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21,477-480.

65.

Lorr, M. (1986). Interpersonal Style Inventory (ISI) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

66.

Lorr, M. , & DeJong, J. (1986). A short form of the interpersonal style inventory (ISI). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42,466-468.

67.

Lorr, M. , Youniss, R. P. , & Kluth, C. (1992). The interpersonal style inventory and the five-factor model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48,202-206.

68.

MacDonald, D. A. , Anderson, P. E. , Tsagarakis, C. I. , & Holland, C. J. (1994). Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 74,339-344.

69.

Maraun, M. D. , & Chrisjohn, R. D. (1995). Radex structure of Jackson’s Basic Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 18,881-892.

70.

McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint factor analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer.

71.

McCrae, R. R. (1991). The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 399-414.

72.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology. American Psychologist, 41,1001-1003.

73.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1989a). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,586-595.

74.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1989b). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57,17-40.

75.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.

76.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1991). The NEO personality inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69,367-376.

77.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1994). Does Lorr’s Interpersonal Style Inventory measure the five-factor model? Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 195-197.

78.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1995). Positive and negative valence within the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 29,443-460.

79.

McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52,509-516.

80.

McCrae, R. R. , Costa, P. T. , & Piedmont, R. L. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 61,1-26.

81.

McCrae, R. R. , & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60,175-215.

82.

McCrae, R. R. , Zonderman, A. B. , Costa, P. T. , Bond, M. H. , & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,552-566.

83.

Mershon, B. , & Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 675-680.

84.

Millon, T. (1983). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

85.

Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the MCMI-II Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

86.

Millon, T. (1994). Manual for the MCMI-III. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

87.

Montag, I. , & Levin, J. (1994). The five factor model and psychopathology in nonclinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 17,1-6.

88.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

89.

Morey, L. C. , Waugh, M. H. , & Blashfield, R. K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: Their derivation and correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49,245-251.

90.

Myers, I. B. , & McCauley, M. H. (1985). A guide to the development of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

91.

O’Connor, B. P. , & Dyce, J. A. (1998). A test of models of personality disorder configuration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107,3-16.

92.

Panter, A. T. , Tanaka, J. S. , & Hoyle, R. H. (1994). Structural models for multimode designs in personality and temperament research. In C. F. Halverson , G. A. Kohnstamm , & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 111-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

93.

Paunonen, S. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following or-thogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33-59.

94.

Paunonen, S. V. , & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30,42-59.

95.

Paunonen, S. V. , Jackson, D. N. , Trzebinski, J. , & Forsterling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,447-456.

96.

Piedmont, R. L. , McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adjective Check List scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60,630-637.

97.

Piedmont, R. L. , McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1992). An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58,67-78.

98.

Saucier, G. , & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the big five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.

99.

Schinka, J. A. , Dye, D. A. , & Curtiss, G. (1997). Correspondence between five-factor and RIASEC models of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68,355-368.

100.

Sherman, R. C. , & Poe, C. A. (1970). Factor-analytic scales of a normative version of the EPPS. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 2,243-248.

101.

Smith, D. R. , & Snell, W. E. (1996). Goldberg’s bipolar measure of the big-five personality dimensions: Reliability and validity. European Journal of Personality, 10,283-299.

102.

Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681-706). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

103.

Tellegen, A. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122-130.

104.

ten Berge, J.M.F. (1986). Some relationships between descriptive comparisons of components from different studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 29-40.

105.

Trull, T. J. (1992). DSM-III-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: An empirical comparison. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 553-560.

106.

Trull, T. J. , Useda, D. , Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), the NEO-PI, and the NEO-PIR. Psychological Assessment, 7,508-516.

107.

Tucker, L. R. (1958). An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 111-136.

108.

Velicer, W. F. , & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25,1-28.

109.

Watson, D. , Clark, L. A. , & Harkness, A. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103,18-31.

110.

Watson, D. , & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98,219-235.

111.

Widiger, T. A. , & Trull, T. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology: An application of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60,363-393.

112.

Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.). (1996). The five-factor model of personality. New York: Guilford.

113.

Wiggins, J. S. , Steiger, J. H. , & Gaelick, L. (1983). Evaluating circumplexity in personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16,263-289.

114.

Wiggins, J. S. , Trapnell, P. , & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23,517-530.

115.

Windle, M. , & Lerner, R. M. (1986). Reassessing the dimensions of temperament individuality across the life span: The Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R). Journal of Adolescent Research, 1,213-230.