Pedophilic interests are considered as one of the most important diagnostic aspects and one of the strongest predictors of sexual recidivism among persons convicted of sexual offenses against children. The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) is a comparatively easy-to-score diagnostic actuarial instrument to assess pedohebephilic interests. The present study aimed to examine the convergent, predictive, and incremental validity of the German version of the SSPI-2 in a sample of N = 438 males released from the Austrian prison system who had been convicted and incarcerated because of sexual offenses against children. As expected, the SSPI-2 was moderately correlated with a diagnosis of (exclusive) pedophilia and with the risk assessment instruments Static-99 and Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) v2. The examination of the predictive validity revealed moderate effect sizes of the SSPI-2 for the prediction of sexually motivated recidivism. Sequential Cox regressions showed that the SSPI-2 incrementally predicts sexual recidivism and sexual noncontact recidivism beyond the SVR-20 v2 and the diagnosis of exclusive pedophilia; however, the SSPI-2 did not have incremental predictive validity beyond the Static-99. Finally, normative data were constructed for the observed and calculated proportions of pedophilia and exclusive pedophilia diagnoses and for 5-year sexual recidivism rates.
AllisonP. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. SAGE.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). APA.
3.
BabchishinK. M.NunesK. L.HermannC. A. (2013). The validity of implicit association test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(3), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0022-8
4.
BanseR.SchmidtA. F.ClarbourJ. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357598
5.
BiedermannL.EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.TurnerD. (2023). Are mental disorders associated with recidivism in men convicted of sexual offenses?Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 148(1), 6-18. https://doi.org./10.1111/acps.13547
6.
BlanchardR.KollaN. J.CantorJ. M.KlassenP. E.DickeyR.KubanM. E.BlakT. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sex Abuse, 19(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900307
7.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. The Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
8.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (2017). Manual for version 2 of the sexual violence risk—20: Structured professional judgment guidelines for assessing and managing risk of sexual violence., Protect International Risk and Safety Services Inc.
9.
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL. M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568114
10.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse, 30(6), 676–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217691965
EherR. (2016). The forensic relevance of paedophilia in the assessment of child molesters. In CraigL. A.RettenbergerM. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, and treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 2, pp. 863–876). John Wiley & Sons.
13.
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211403164
14.
EherR.OlverM. E.HeurixI.SchillingF.RettenbergerM. (2015). Predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000144
15.
EherR.RettenbergerM.EtzlerS.EberhautS.MokrosA. (2019a). Eine gemeinsame Sprache für die Risikokommunikation bei Sexualstraftätern. Trenn-und Normwerte für das neue Fünf-Kategorienmodell des Static-99 [A common language for communicating risk in sexual offenders—The 5-category model Static-99]. Recht & Psychiatrie, 37, 91–99.
16.
EherR.RettenbergerM.TurnerD. (2019b). The prevalence of mental disorders in incarcerated contact sexual offenders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 139(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13024
FaitakisM.StephensS.SetoM. C. (2023). The predictive validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2). Sexual Abuse, 35(5), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632221149696
19.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications.
20.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). Wiley.
21.
GouveiaC. (2021). A prevalência de pedófilos entre os abusadores sexuais de crianças: validação da SSPI-2. [Dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.].
22.
HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.PhenixA. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000371
23.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362.
24.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
25.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.73.6.1154
26.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333.
27.
HareR. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
28.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.CormierC. A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
29.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
30.
HelmusL. M.ÓCiardhaC.SetoM. C. (2015). The Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI): Construct, predictive, and incremental validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000099
KalmusE.BeechA. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002
33.
KingstonD. A.FirestoneP.MouldenH. M.BradfordJ. M. (2007). The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: a comparison of various classification procedures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9091-x
34.
LamA.MitchellJ.SetoM. C. (2010). Lay perceptions of child pornography offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 173–201. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.52.2.173
35.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex Abuse, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
36.
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.FernaneS.FernandezY. M.NunesK. L.CantorJ. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
37.
MokrosA.DombertB.OsterheiderM.ZappalàA.SanttilaP. (2010). Assessment of pedophilic sexual interest with an attentional choice reaction time task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9530-6
38.
MokrosA.HabermeyerE.KüchenhoffH. (2018). The uncertainty of psychological and psychiatric diagnoses. Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 556–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000524
39.
MouldenH. M.FirestoneP.KingstonD.BradfordJ. (2009). Recidivism in pedophiles: An investigation using different diagnostic methods. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(5), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174055
40.
RenaudM. (2019). An examination of the association between anxiety and the paraphilias [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa. uO Research].
41.
RettenbergerM.BoerD. P.EherR. (2011). The predictive accuracy of risk factors in the Sexual Violence Risk–20 (SVR-20). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(10), 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811416908
42.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2006). Die deutsche Übersetzung des Static 99 zur aktuarischen Kriminalprognose verurteilter Sexualstraftäter [German translation of Static 99 for actuarial risk assessment of convicted sex offenders]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 89(1), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2006-00063
43.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2024). How the risk principle reduces recidivism: The impact of legislative revisions on the release and reoffense rates of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. Law and Human Behavior, 48(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000560
44.
RettenbergerM.Haubner-MacleanT.EherR. (2013). The contribution of age to the Static-99 risk assessment in a population-based prison sample of sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(12), 1413–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813492518
45.
RettenbergerM.HuckerS. J.BoerD. P.EherR. (2009). The reliability and validity of the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20): An international review. Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(2), 1–14.
46.
RettenbergerM.RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.EherR. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Psychological Assessment, 29, 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000390
47.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
48.
SchmidtA. F.BabchishinK. M.LehmannR. J. B. (2017). A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3
49.
SetoM. C. (2018). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
50.
SetoM. C.CantorJ.BlanchardR. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
51.
SetoM. C.HarrisG.RiceM.BarbareeH. (2004). The Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037426.55935.9c
52.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 00103. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300103
53.
SetoM. C. (2013). Internet sex offenders. American Psychological Association.
54.
SetoM. C.FedoroffJ. P.BradfordJ. M.KnackN.RodriguesN. C.CurryS.BoothB.GrayJ.CameronC.BourgetD.MessinaS.JamesE.WatsonD.GulatiS.BalmacedaR.AhmedA. G. (2016). Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 49, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.002
55.
SetoM. C.SandlerJ. C.FreemanN. J. (2017a). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests: Predictive and concurrent validity. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618375
56.
SetoM. C.StephensS.LalumièreM. L.CantorJ. M. (2017b). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI–2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612444
57.
StephensS.SetoM. C.CantorJ. M.LalumièreM. L. (2019). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2 may be a measure of pedohebephilia). The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(10), 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015
58.
SwetsJ. A.DawesR. M.MonahanJ. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001
59.
TierrneyD. W.McCabeM. P. (2001). The assessment of denial, cognitive distortions, and victim empathy among pedophilic sex offenders: An evaluation of the utility of self-report measures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838001002003004
60.
TsaoI. T.ChuC. M. (2021). An exploratory study of recidivism risk assessment instruments for individuals convicted of sexual offenses in Singapore. Sexual Abuse, 33(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219884575
61.
WilsonR. J.AbracenJ.LoomanJ.PichecaJ. E.FergusonM. (2011). Pedophilia: an evaluation of diagnostic and risk prediction methods. Sexual Abuse, 23(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384277
62.
WittströmF.LångströmN.LandgrenV.RahmC. (2020). Risk factors for sexual offending in self-referred men with pedophilic disorder: A Swedish case-control study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 571775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571775
