Valid assessment of pedohebephilic interests (i.e., sexual interest in children) is fundamental to forensic clinical practice. Phallometric testing—which measures changes in penile circumference or volume, while stimuli depicting different ages and sexual activities are presented—is widely used in clinical and research settings to detect such interests. This meta-analysis summarizes studies comparing sexual offenders against children and various types of controls on phallometric tests for pedohebephilic interests (37 samples; N = 6,785) and studies examining the relationship between phallometric test scores and sexual reoffending (16 samples; N = 2,709). The findings suggest that several phallometric testing procedures are valid indicators of pedohebephilic interest. Certain methodological features of phallometric tests were associated with greater validity, such as, slide or audio-plus-slide stimuli and z-score-based indices. In addition, phallometric tests for pedohebephilic, pedophilic, and hebephilic interests predicted sexual reoffending which provides further evidence that phallometric test scores are valid indicators of sexual interest in children. In general, the interpretation of phallometric test scores as indicators of pedohebephilic interests is supported.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.CardR. D.Cunningham-RathnerJ.FarrallW. R.JensenS. H.. . . WormithJ. S. (1989, May). The stimulus standardization study of the Multisite Assessment Group. Paper presented at the First International Conference on the Treatment of Sex Offenders, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
2.
*AbelG. G.HuffmanJ.WarbergB.HollandC. L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 81-95. doi:10.1177/107906329801000202
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
*BarbareeH. E.MarshallW. L. (1989). Erectile response among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders: Five distinct age preference profiles. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 70-82.
5.
BarbareeH. E.MewhortD. J. K. (1994). The effects of z-score transformation on measures of relative erectile response strength: A re-appraisal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 547-558. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90144-9
6.
*BarsettiI.EarlsC. M.LalumièreM. L.BélangerN. (1998). The differentiation of intrafamilial and extrafamilial heterosexual child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 275-286. doi:10.1177/088626098013002007
7.
*BaxterD. J.MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E.DavidsonP. R.MalcolmP. B. (1984). Deviant sexual behavior: Differentiating sex offenders by criminal and personal history, psychometric measures, and sexual responses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11, 477-501. doi:10.1177/0093854884011004007
8.
BeechA.BourgonG.HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.LangtonC.MarquesJ.. . . YatesP. M. (2007). Collaborative outcome data committee’s guidelines for the evaluation of sexual offender treatment outcome research Part 2: CODC guidelines. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
BlanchardR.KlassenP.DickeyR.KubanM. E.BlakT. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118-126.
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, England: Wiley.
12.
*Brouillette-AlarieS. (2014). Phallometric test data from a sample of Canadian sexual offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
*ByrneP. M. (2001). The reliability and validity of less explicit audio and “clothed” visual penile plethysmograph stimuli with child molesters and nonoffenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
14.
*CanalesD. C.OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2009). Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version for measuring sexual deviance. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 474-492.
15.
*CantorJ. M. (2014). Volumetric phallometry test data from a sample of Canadian sexual offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
CantorJ. M.McPhailI. V. (2015). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for hebephilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1940-1950. doi:10.1111/jsm.12970
17.
*ChaplinT. C.RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1995). Salient victim suffering and the sexual responses of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 249-255.
18.
*CliftR. J.RajlicG.GrettonH. M. (2009). Discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph in adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 335-362. doi:10.1177/1079063209338491
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
*CohenL. J.NikiforovK.GansS.PoznanskyO.McGeochP.WeaverC.. . . GalynkerI. (2002). Heterosexual male perpetrators of childhood sexual abuse: A preliminary neuropsychiatric model. Psychiatric Quarterly, 73, 313-336. doi:10.1023/A:1020416101092
21.
*CôtéK.EarlsC. M.LalumièreM. L. (2002). Birth order, birth interval, and deviant sexual preferences among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 67-81. doi:10.1023/A:1013081527837
22.
CummingG. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205-220. doi:10.1002/sim.3471
23.
*DefrancescoD. P. (1992). Identifying differences among male sex offenders: Child molesters versus exhibitionists versus voyeurs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan.
24.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
25.
EarlsC. M.QuinseyV. L.CastonguayL. G. (1987). A comparison of three methods of scoring penile circumference changes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 493-500. doi:10.1007/BF01541713
26.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
27.
*FergusonC. M. (1990). The effectiveness of simultaneous stimulus presentation in the assessment of deviant sexual preferences in incest offenders and nonfamilial child molesters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
28.
*FernandezY. M. (1998). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders against female victims: An examination of reliability and validity issues (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
29.
*FernandezY. M. (2014). Phallometric test data from a sample of federally incarcerated Canadian sexual offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
FinkelhorD. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press.
31.
FinkelhorD.ArajiS. (1986). Explanations of pedophilia: A four factor model. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 145-161. doi:10.1080/00224498609551297
32.
*FirestoneP.BradfordJ. M.GreenbergD. M.NunesK. L. (2000). Differentiation of homicidal child molesters, nonhomicidal child molesters, and nonoffenders by phallometry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1847-1850.
33.
*FirestoneP.BradfordJ. M.GreenbergD. M.SerranG. A. (2000). The relationship of deviant sexual arousal and psychopathy in incest offenders, extrafamilial child molesters, and rapists. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 303-308.
34.
*FreundK. (1965). Diagnosing heterosexual pedophilia by means of a test for sexual interest. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3, 229-234. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(65)90031-8
35.
*FreundK.BlanchardR. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100-105.
36.
*FreundK.WatsonR.DickeyR. (1991). Sex offenses against female children perpetrated by men who are not pedophiles. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 409-423. doi:10.1080/00224499109551616
37.
*FreundK.WatsonR. J. (1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychological Assessment, 3, 254-260.
38.
*FreundK.WatsonR. J. (1992). The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: An exploratory study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 18, 34-43. doi:10.1080/00926239208404356
39.
GoldsteinH.HealyM. J. R. (1995). The graphical presentation of a collection of means. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 158, 175-177.
40.
*GoyetteM. (2012). Évaluation des intérêts sexuels auprès d’agresseurs sexuels d’enfants par la vidéo-oculographie et la présentation de stimuli générés par ordinateur [Assessment of sexual interests with sexual aggressors against children by video-oculography and presentation of computer-generated stimuli] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
41.
GreenbergD. M. (1998). Sexual recidivism in sex offenders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 459-465. doi:10.1177/070674379804300502
42.
*GrossmanL. S.CavanaughJ. L.HaywoodT. W. (1992). Deviant sexual responsiveness on penile plethysmography using visual stimuli: Alleged child molesters vs. normal control subjects. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 207-208.
43.
GrumbachM. M.StyneD. M. (1998). Puberty: Ontogeny, neuroendocrinology, physiology, and disorders. In WilsonJ. D.FosterD. W.KronenbergH. M.LarsenP. R. (Eds.), Williams textbook of endocrinology (pp. 1509-1625). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
44.
HallG. C. N.HirschmanR. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662-669. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.662
45.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
46.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
47.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
48.
HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
49.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (1996). The science in phallometric measurement of male sexual interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 156-160. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512355
50.
*HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.ChaplinT. C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 389-394. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00070-4
51.
*HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.ChaplinT. C.EarlsC. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502-511.
52.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560.
53.
HowesR. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 9-24. doi:10.1177/107906329500700104
54.
*HowesR. J. (2014). Phallometric test data from a sample of federally incarcerated Canadian offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
55.
*JonesD. T. (2014). An evaluation of the use of phallometric assessment for men incarcerated for sexually offending against children in New Zealand: Past results and future directions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand.
56.
*KleinT. L. (2004). Differentiating between developmentally disabled child molesters and perpetrators of adult sexual molestation using penile plethysmography (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
57.
LalumièreM. L.HarrisG. T. (1998). Common questions regarding the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 227-237. doi:10.1023/A:1021369904984
58.
*LanhamD. (2011). The sensitivity and specificity of phallometric assessment and the Abel assessment for sexual interest among a group of sexual offenders against children and other sexual offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.
59.
LawsD. R. (2003). Penile plethysmography: Will we ever get it right? In WardT.LawsD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 82-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
LawsD. R. (2009). Penile plethysmography: Strengths, limitations, innovations. In ThorntonD.LawsD. R. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders (pp. 7-29). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
61.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
*LoomanJ. (2000). Sexual arousal in rapists and child molesters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
63.
*LoomanJ. (2011). Phallometric test data from a sample of federally incarcerated Canadian sexual offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
64.
*LoomanJ.MarshallW. L. (2001). Phallometric assessment designed to detect arousal to children: The responses of rapists and child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 3-13. doi:10.1023/A:1009558211749
65.
*LoomanJ.MarshallW. L. (2005). Sexual arousal in rapists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 367-389. doi:10.1177/0093854805276402
66.
MacGregor-ForsI.PaytonM. E. (2013). Contrasting diversity values: Statistical inferences based on overlapping confidence intervals. PLoS ONE, 8, e56794. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056794
67.
*MalcolmP. B.AndrewD. A.QuinseyQ. L. (1993). Discriminant and predictive validity of phallometrically measured sexual age and gender preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 486-501. doi:10.1177/088626093008004004
68.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
69.
MarquesJ. K.WiederandersM.DayD. M.NelsonC.van OmmerenA. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107. doi:10.1007/s11194-005-1212-x
70.
*MarshallW. L. (1988). The use of sexually explicit stimuli by rapists, child molesters, and nonoffenders. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 267-288. doi:10.1080/00224498809551459
71.
MarshallW. L. (2014). Phallometric assessments of sexual interests: An update. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 428-234. doi:10.1007/s11920-013-0428-6
72.
*MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 26, 499-511. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(88)90146-5
73.
MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257-275). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
74.
*MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E.ButtJ. (1988). Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 383-391. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(88)90071-X
75.
*MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E.ChristopheD. (1986). Sexual offenders against female children: Sexual preferences for age of victims and type of behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 18, 424-439.
76.
MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M. (2000). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychological Review, 20, 807-822. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00013-6
77.
MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M. (2001). Sexual preferences: Are they useful in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 131-143. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00056-8
78.
MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M. (2003). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Theory, research, and practice. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
79.
*MartinezT. D. (2008). Penile plethysmography: Validation with a juvenile sex offending population (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Texas, Denton.
80.
*McCoyM. E. (1997). Predictors of recidivism in a population of Canadian sex offenders: Psychological, physiological, and offence factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
81.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
82.
*MichaudP.ProulxJ. (2009). Penile-response profiles of sexual aggressors during phallometric testing. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 308-344. doi:10.1177/1079063209342073
83.
*MillerG. (1998). The MTC:CM3 axis I classification system for child molesters and its relationship to psychopathy, arousal, and the social introversion scale of the MMPI (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California School of Professional Psychology, Fresno.
84.
*MinerM. H.WestM.DayD. M. (1995). Sexual preference for child and aggressive stimuli: Comparison of rapists and child molesters using auditory and visual stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 454-551.
85.
MoreyL. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory™ professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
86.
*MouldenH. M.FirestoneP.KingstonD.BradfordJ. (2009). Recidivism in pedophiles: An investigation using different diagnostic methods. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 680-701. doi:10.1080/14789940903174055
87.
MurphyL.RangerR.FedoroffJ. P.StewartH.DwyerR. G.BurkeW. (2015). Standardization of penile plethysmography testing in assessment of problematic sexual interests. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1853-1861. doi:10.1111/jsm.12979
88.
MurphyW. D.BarbareeH. E. (1994). Assessments of sex offenders by measures of erectile response: Psychometric properties and decision making. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
89.
PaytonM. E.GreenstoneM. H.SchenkerN. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance?Journal of Insect Science, 3, 34-40.
90.
*ProulxJ.PellerinB.ParadisY.McKibbenA.AubutJ.OuimetM. (1997). Static and dynamic predictors of recidivism in sexual aggressors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 7-27. doi:10.1177/107906329700900102
91.
*QuinseyV. L.ChaplinT. C. (1988). Penile responses of child molesters and normal to descriptions of encounters with children involving sex and violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 259-274. doi:10.1177/088626088003003001
92.
*QuinseyV. L.SteinmanC. M.BergersenS. G.HolmesT. F. (1975). Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and “normals” to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli. Behavior Therapy, 6, 213-219.
93.
RaudenbushS. W. (2009). Random effects models. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 295-315). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
94.
ReitsmaJ. B.RutjesA. W. S.WhitingP.VlassovV. V.LeeflangM. M. G.DeeksJ. J. (2009). Assessing methodological quality. In DeeksJ. J.BossuytP. M.GatsonisC. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (Chap. 9, Version 1.0.0). London, England: The Cochrane Collaboration.
95.
*RenaudP.ChartierS.RouleauJ.ProulxJ.TrottierD.BradfordJ. P.. . . BouchardS. (2009). Gaze behavior nonlinear dynamics assessed in virtual immersion as a diagnostic index of sexual deviancy: Preliminary results. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 6. Retrieved from https://www.jvrb.org/past-issues/6.2009/1753
96.
*RenaudR.ChartierR.RouleauJ. L.ProulxJ.GoyetteM.TrottierD.. . . BouchardS. (2013). Using immersive virtual reality and ecological psychology to probe into child molesters’ phenomenology. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 102-120. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.617014
97.
*RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.LangC.ChaplinT. C. (2012). Adolescents who have sexually offended: Is phallometry valid?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 133-152. doi:10.1177/1079063211404249
98.
*RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386.
99.
SakheimD. K.BarlowD. H.BeckJ. G.AbrahamsonD. J. (1985). A comparison of male heterosexual and male homosexual patterns of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 183-198.
100.
*SerinR. C.MaillouxD. L.MalcolmP. B. (2001). Psychopathy, deviant sexual arousal, and recidivism among sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 234-246. doi:10.1177/088626001016003004
101.
*SerinR. C.MalcolmP. B.KhanaA.BarbareeH. E. (1994). Psychopathy and deviant sexual arousal in incarcerated sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 3-11. doi:10.1177/088626094009001001
102.
SetoM. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
103.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15-25. doi:10.1177/107906320101300103
104.
*SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L.BlanchardR. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319-327.
105.
*SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L.KubanM. (1999). The sexual preferences of incest offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 267-272.
106.
SetoM. C.StephensS.LalumièreM. L.CantorJ. M. (2015). The revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI–2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. doi:1079063215612444
107.
WardT.SiegertR. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 197-248. doi:10.1080/10683160208401823
108.
*WexlerA. (2005). An examination of recidivism in a population of Canadian sex offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
109.
WhitakerW.LeB.HansonR. K.BakerC. K.McMahonP. M.RyanG.. . . RiceD. D. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 529-548. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005
110.
*WilsonR. J.AbracenJ.LoomanJ.PichecaJ. E.FergusonM. (2011). Pedophilia: An evaluation of diagnostic and risk prediction methods. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 260-274. doi:10.1177/1079063210384277
111.
WilsonR. J.MinerM. H. (2016). Measurement of male sexual arousal and interest using penile plethysmography and viewing time. In LawsD. R.O’DonohueW. (Eds.), Treatment of sex offenders (pp. 107-131). Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
