Psychometric properties of the 100-item English-language HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) were examined using samples of online respondents (N = 100,318 self-reports) and of undergraduate students (N = 2,868 self- and observer reports). The results were as follows: First, the hierarchical structure of the HEXACO-100 was clearly supported in two principal components analyses: each of the six factors was defined by its constituent facets and each of the 25 facets was defined by its constituent items. Second, the HEXACO-100 factor scales showed fairly low intercorrelations, with only one pair of scales (Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness) having an absolute correlation above .20 in self-report data. Third, the factor and facet scales showed strong self/observer convergent correlations, which far exceeded the self/observer discriminant correlations.
AghababaeiN.WassermanJ. A.NanniniD. (2014). The religious person revisited: Cross-cultural evidence from the HEXACO model of personality structure. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 17, 24-29.
2.
AshtonM. C.de VriesR. E.LeeK. (in press). Trait variance and response style variance in the scales of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Journal of Personality Assessment.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
4.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.
5.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216-1228.
6.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340-345.
7.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO-PI-R self- and observer reports. European Journal of Personality, 24, 278-289.
8.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.de VriesR. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139-152.
9.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.GoldbergL. R.de VriesR. E. (2009). Higher-order factors of personality: Do they exist?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79-91.
10.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PeruginiM.SzarotaP.de VriesR. E.Di BlasL.. . . De RaadB. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.
11.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PozzebonJ. A.VisserB. A.WorthN. C. (2010). Status-driven risk taking and the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 734-737.
12.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.VisserB. A.PozzebonJ. A. (2008). Phobic tendency within the Five-Factor and HEXACO models of personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 734-746.
13.
BeerA.WatsonD. (2008). Asymmetry in judgments of personality: Others are less differentiated than the self. Journal of Personality, 76, 535-560.
14.
BourdageJ. S.WiltshireJ.LeeK. (2015). Personality and workplace impression management: Correlates and implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 537-546.
15.
ChirumboloA.LeoneL. (2010). Personality and politics: The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 43-48.
16.
CohenT. R.PanterA. T.TuranN.MorseL.KimY. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 943-963.
17.
CohenT. R.WolfS. T.PanterA. T.InskoC. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947-966.
18.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19.
De RaadB.BareldsD. P.TimmermanM. E.De RooverK.MlačićB.ChurchA. T. (2014). Towards a pan-cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycholexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497-510.
20.
De VriesR. E. (2013). The 24-item brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871-880.
21.
De VriesR. E.RealoA.AllikJ. (2016). Using personality item characteristics to predict single-item reliability, retest reliability, and self-other agreement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 Aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
23.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203.
24.
GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: A comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513-523.
25.
HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty–Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516-519.
26.
HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2015). When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 72-88.
27.
JacksonD. N. (1978). Interpreter’s guide to the Jackson Personality Inventory. In McReynoldsP. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 55-102). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
30.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182-191.
31.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001-1053.
32.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2012a). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 596-600.
33.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2012b). The H factor of personality: Why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive—And why it matters for everyone. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
34.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2013). Prediction of self- and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 668-675.
35.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.WiltshireJ.BourdageJ. S.VisserB. A.GallucciA. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169-184.
36.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110.
37.
McCraeR. R.KurtzJ. E.YamagataS.TerraccianoA. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28-50.
38.
McKayD. A.TokarD. M. (2012). The HEXACO and five-factor models of personality in relation to RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 138-149.
39.
NoftleE. E.RobinsR. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116-130.
40.
PaunonenS. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33-59.
41.
RomeroE.VillarP.López-RomeroL. (2015). Assessing six factors in Spain: Validation of the HEXACO-100 in relation to the Five Factor Model and other conceptually relevant criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 75-81.
42.
SaroglouV.PichonI.TrompetteL.VerschuerenM.DernelleR. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323-348.
43.
SchönemannP. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1-10.
44.
SibleyC. G.LuytenN.PurnomoM.MobberleyA.WoottonL. W.HammondM. D.. . . West-NewmanT. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142-159.
45.
ThalmayerA. G.SaucierG.EigenhuisA. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995-1009.
46.
ThielmannI.HilbigB. E.ZettlerI.MoshagenM. (2016). On measuring the sixth basic personality dimension: A comparison between HEXACO Honesty-Humility and Big Six Honesty-Propriety. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191116638411
47.
WellerJ. A.ThulinE. W. (2012). Do honest people take fewer risks? Personality correlates of risk-taking to achieve gains and avoid losses in HEXACO space. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 923-926.
48.
WintersteinB. P.SilviaP. J.KwapilT. R.KaufmanJ. C.Reiter-PalmonR.WigertB. (2011). Brief assessment of schizotypy: Developing short forms of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 920-924.
49.
ZettlerI.HilbigB. E.HaubrichJ. (2011). Altruism at the ballots: Predicting political attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 130-133.
50.
ZettlerI.HilbigB. E.HeydaschT. (2013). Two sides of one coin: Honesty-Humility and social factors mutually shape social dilemma decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 286-295.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
