Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-3
Construct Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP): Examining the Internal Structure and Generalizability of CAPP Self-Ratings Across Gender and Ethnicity
The Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) is a recently developed conceptual model of psychopathy designed to index the disorder across 33 personality traits. Although recent research has evidenced support for the CAPP model with respect to the convergent, criterion, and predictive validity of CAPP instruments, little work has examined the optimal internal structure and generalizability of the model and associated measures. The present study sought to elaborate on the construct validity and psychometric properties of the CAPP Lexical Self Rating Scale and determine the utility of the instrument across men and women, and individuals of Caucasian and East Asian descent. Within a large sample of self-identified offenders (N = 1,414), we found strong support for a three-factor model comprising domains reflecting interpersonal dominance, behavioral disinhibition, and deficient emotional attachment. Analyses examining the generalizability of the model provide further insight into its applicability for diverse populations.
BarnlundD. C. (1989). Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities. Wadsworth.
2.
BeauducelA.HerzbergP. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
3.
BentlerP. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
4.
BerryJ. W.BerryJ. W.PoortingaY. H.SegallM. H.DasenP. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlashfieldR. K.LivesleyW. J. (1991). Metaphorical analysis of psychiatric classification as a psychological test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.3.262
6.
BoomsmaA. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294248
7.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
8.
ByrneB. M.StewartS. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 287-321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_7
9.
CaleE. M.LilienfeldS. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(8), 1179-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8
10.
CampbellA. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford University Press.
11.
CangurS.ErcanI. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580
12.
ChandlerJ. J.PaolacciG. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698203
13.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
14.
ChenF. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013193
15.
ChenG. (1995). Differences in self-disclosure patterns among Americans versus Chinese: A comparative study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022195261006
16.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
CleckleyH. (1941). The mask of sanity: An attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. Mosby.
19.
ColinsO. F.FantiK. A.SalekinR. T.AndershedH. (2017). Psychopathic personality in the general population: Differences and similarities across gender. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2016_30_237
20.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation, design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally.
21.
CookeD. J. (1996). Psychopathic personality in different cultures: What do we know? What do we need to find out?Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1996.10.1.23
22.
CookeD. J. (2018). Psychopathic personality disorder: Capturing an elusive concept. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 14(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.14.1.1
CookeD. J.HartS. D.LoganC.MichieC. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746759
25.
CookeD. J.KossonD. S.MichieC. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.531
26.
CookeD. J.MichieC. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.13.2.171
27.
CookeD. J.MichieC.SkeemJ. (2007). Understanding the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: An exploration of methodological confusion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(S49), S39-S50. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.190.5.s39
28.
CrossS. E.MarkusH. R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnP. O. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (pp. 378-396). Guilford Press.
29.
DawsonS. E.McCuishE. C.HartS. D.CorradoR. R. (2012). Critical issues in the assessment of adolescent psychopathy: An illustration using two case studies. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(2), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.676149
30.
DouglasK. S.VincentG. M.EdensJ. F. (2018). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 682-709). Guilford Press.
31.
DrasgowF.KanferR. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 662-680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.662
32.
DubowE. F.HuesmannL. R.BoxerP.SmithC. (2014). Childhood predictors and age 48 outcomes of self-reports and official records of offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1929
33.
EdensJ. F.PetrilaJ.KelleyS. E. (2018). Legal and ethical issues in the assessment and treatment of psychopathy. In PatrickC. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 732-754). Guildford Press.
34.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701382864
35.
FarringtonD. P.JolliffeD.LoeberR.HomishD. L. (2007). How many offenses are really committed per juvenile court offender?Victims & Offenders, 2(3), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880701403934
36.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439-492). Information Age Publishing.
37.
FiskeA. P. (1995). The cultural dimensions of psychological research: Method effects imply cultural mediation. In ShroutP. E.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Personality research method and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 271-294). Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
FlórezG.CasasA.KreisM. K.FortiL.MartínezJ.FernándezJ.CondeM.Vázquez-NoguerolR.BlancoT.HoffH. A.CookeD. J. (2018). A prototypicality validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) model Spanish version. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(5), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_167
39.
FowlerK. A.LilienfeldS. O.PatrickC. J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014938
40.
GlennA. L.KurzbanR. C.RaineA. (2011). Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(5), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.03.009
41.
GreeneA. L.EatonN. R.LiK.ForbesM. K.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E.WaldmanI. D.CiceroD. C.ConwayC. C.DochertyA. R.FriedE. I.IvanovaM. Y.JonasK. G.LatzmanR. D.PatrickC. J.ReininghausU.TackettJ. L.WrightA. G. C.KotovR. (2019). Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(7), 740-764. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000434.supp
42.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 932-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
43.
HanniballK. B.AkninL. B.DouglasK. S.ViljoenJ. L. (2018). Does helping promote well-being in at-risk youth and ex-offender samples?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82(May), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.11.001
44.
HanniballK. B.GatnerD. T.DouglasK. S.ViljoenJ. L.AkninL. B. (2019). Examining the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure and comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality in self-identified offender populations. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(4), 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000333
45.
HareR. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
HarrendorfS.HeiskanenM.MalbyS. (2010). International statistics on crime and justice. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
48.
HartS. D.KroppP. R.HareR. D. (1988). Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.227
49.
HemphillJ.TemplemanR.WongS.HareR. (1998). Psychopathy and crime: Recidivism and criminal careers. In CookeD.ForthA.HareR. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society (pp. 374-399). Kluwer.
50.
HoffH. A.RypdalK.HystadS. W.HartS. D.MykletunA.KreisM. K. F.CookeD. J. (2014). Cross-language consistency of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(4), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000069
51.
HoffH. A.RypdalK.MykletunA.CookeD. J. (2012). A prototypicality validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality model (CAPP). Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(3), 414-427. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.3.414
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
54.
KirmayerL. J. (2006). Beyond the “new cross-cultural psychiatry”: Cultural biology, discursive psychology and the ironies of globalization. Transcultural Psychiatry, 43(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461506061761
55.
KreisM. K. F.CookeD. J. (2011). Capturing the psychopathic female: A prototypicality analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) across gender. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(5), 634-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1003
56.
KreisM. K. F.CookeD. J.MichieC.HoffH. A.LoganC. (2012). The Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP): Content validation using prototypical analysis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.3.402
57.
Le BlancM.FréchetteM. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth: Multilevel and developmental perspectives. Springer.
58.
LiC. H. (2014). The performance of MLR, ULSMV, and WLSMV estimation in structural regression models with ordinal variables [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/3268
59.
LilienfeldS. O.PatrickC. J.BenningS. D.BergJ.SellbomM.EdensJ. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987
60.
LimY. L. (2009). Cross cultural generalizability of psychopathic personality disorder: Differences between individualistic and collectivistic cultures [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
61.
LippaR. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
LloydC. D.ClarkH. J.ForthA. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between psychopathy checklist-revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X468432
63.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023-1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
64.
MacCallumR. C.RoznowskiM.NecowitzL. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490-504. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.111.3.490
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
67.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2007). A time and place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 869-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.022
68.
MillerJ. D.LamkinJ.Maples-KellerJ. L.SleepC. E.LynamD. R. (2018). A test of the empirical profile and coherence of theDSM-5 psychopathy specifier. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 870-881. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1037/pas0000536
69.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
70.
MurrayA. L.JohnsonW. (2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41(5), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004
NichollsT. L.PetrilaJ. (2005). Gender and psychopathy: An overview of important issues and introduction to the special issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 729-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.677
74.
NikolovaN. L. (2009). Comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality disorder–institutional rating scale (CAPP–IRS)–validation [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
75.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
76.
ParisJ. (2007). An overview on gender, personality and mental health. Personality and Mental Health, 1(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1
77.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
78.
PedersenL.KunzC.ElsassP.RasmussenK. (2010). Psychopathy as a risk factor for violent recidivism: Investigating the Psychopathy Checklist Screening Version (PCL:SV) and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) in a forensic psychiatric setting. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.526681
79.
PoythressN. G.HallJ. R. (2011). Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.003
80.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
81.
RossJ.IraniL.SilbermanM. S.ZaldivarA.TomlinsonB. (2010). Who are the crowd workers? Shifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. In CHI EA ’10: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2863-2872). ACM.
82.
SandvikA. M.HansenA. L.KristensenM. V.JohnsenB. H.LoganC.ThorntonD. (2012). Assessment of psychopathy: Inter-correlations between psychopathy checklist revised, comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality—institutional rating scale, and self-report of psychopathy scale–III. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746756
SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406661
85.
SellbomM.CookeD. J.HartS. D. (2015). Construct validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP)concept map: Getting closer to the core of psychopathy. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14(3), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2015.1085112
86.
SellbomM.CookeD. J.ShouY. (2019). Development and initial validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality–Self-Report (CAPP-SR). Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 878-894. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000714
87.
ShariatS. V.AssadiS. M.NoroozianM.PakravannejadM.YahyazadehO.AghayanS.CookeD. J. (2010). Psychopathy in Iran: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 676-691. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.676
88.
SinharayS.HabermanS.PuhanG. (2007). Subscores based on classical test theory: To report or not to report. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(4), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00105.x
89.
SkeemJ. L.CookeD. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0008512
90.
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.PatrickC. J.LilienfeldS. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611426706
91.
SteenkampJ.-B. E.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-107. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
92.
StrandS.BelfrageH. (2005). Gender differences in psychopathy in a Swedish offender sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 837-850. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.674
93.
SudmanS.BradburnN. M. (1974). Response effects in surveys. Aldine.
94.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage.
95.
VitaleJ. E.SmithS. S.BrinkleyC. A.NewmanJ. P. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in a sample of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(2), 202-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029002005
96.
WalshZ.SwoggerM. T.KossonD. S. (2009). Psychopathy and instrumental violence: Facet level relationships. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23(4), 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2009.23.4.416
97.
WattsA. L.LilienfeldS. O.EdensJ. F.DouglasK. S.SkeemJ. L.VerschuereB.LoPilatoA. C. (2016). Does response distortion statistically affect the relations between self-report psychopathy measures and external criteria?Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000168
98.
Weizmann-HeneliusG.GrönroosM.PutkonenH.EronenM.LindbergN.Häkkänen-NyholmH. (2010). Psychopathy and gender differences in childhood psychosocial characteristics in homicide offenders: A nationwide register-based study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(6), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2010.506616
99.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
100.
WrightE. M. (2009). The measurement of psychopathy: Dimensional and taxometric approaches. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(4), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08319416
101.
YungY.ThissenD.McLeodL. D. (1999). On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model. Psychometrika, 64(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294531
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
