The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality full-length (SNAP) and short versions (SNAP-SRF and SNAP-ORF) were developed as measures of normal-range and more pathological personality traits. This study investigated the validity of the SNAP Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF), an alternative version of the SNAP Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-SRF) revised for further brevity. The scales of the SNAP-BSRF showed good convergence with the SNAP-SRF and the SNAP Other-Description Rating Form (SNAP-ORF) scales. A three-factor structure consistent with extant literature was found for the SNAP-BSRF using an exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Scales from the SNAP-BSRF showed meaningful associations with self-reported internalizing symptoms. Results suggest that this new version is a reasonable substitute for the SNAP-SRF and will be useful when a very brief measure of adaptive and maladaptive personality is needed.
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
4.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A. (1993a). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
5.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A. (1993b). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
6.
BrowneM. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150.
7.
CalabreseW. R.RudickM. M.SimmsL. J.ClarkL. A. (2012). Development and validation of big four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality–second edition (SNAP-2). Psychological Assessment, 24, 751-763. doi:10.1037/a0026915
8.
CampbellA. (2002). Evidence based practice: Is it good for you?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 215-217.
9.
CampbellA.HemsleyS. (2009). Outcome rating scale and session rating scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13, 1-9. doi:10.1080/13284200802676391
10.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
12.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2001). The effects of model parsimony and sampling error on the fit of structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 236-264. doi:10.1177/109442810143004
13.
ClarkL. A. (1993). SNAP (Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
ClarkL. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505-521. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.505
15.
ClarkL. A.SimmsL. J.WuK. D.CasillasA. (2014). Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-2 (SNAP-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316-336.
17.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 265-286). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
21.
CreamerM.ForanJ.BellR. (1995). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a non-clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 477-485.
22.
DurbinC. E.SchaletB. D.HaydenE. P.SimpsonJ.JordanP. L. (2009). Hypomanic personality traits: A multi-method exploration of their association with normal and abnormal dimensions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 898-905. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.010
23.
EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.SouthS. C.SimmsL. J.ClarkL. A. (2011). Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: Evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1151-1163. doi:10.1017/S0033291710001650
24.
FiedlerE. R.OltmannsT. F.TurkheimerE. (2004). Traits associated with personality disorders and adjustment to military life: Predictive validity of self and peer reports. Military Medicine, 169, 207-211.
25.
FurnhamA.StraitL.HughesD. J. (2012). Modern health worries and personality. Personality and Mental Health, 6, 242-254. doi:10.1002/pmh.1187
26.
GamezW.WatsonD.DoebbelingB. N. (2007). Abnormal personality and the mood and anxiety disorders: Implications for structural models of anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 526-539. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006. 08.003
27.
GillisM. M.HaagaD. A. F.FordG. T. (1995). Normative values for the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 7, 450-455. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.450
28.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
29.
HarlanE.ClarkL. A. (1999). Short forms of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) for self- and collateral ratings: Development, reliability, and validity. Assessment, 6, 131-145.
30.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
31.
HurtS.OltmannsT. F. (2002). Personality traits and pathology in older and younger incarcerated women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 457-464.
32.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
KochanskaG.FriesenborgA. E.LangeL. A.MartelM. M. (2004). Parents personality and infants’ temperament as contributors to their emerging relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 150, 744-759.
35.
KolarD. W.FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 64, 311-337.
36.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
37.
KushnerS. C.TackettJ. L.De ClerqB. (2013). The joint hierarchical structure of adolescent personality pathology: Converging evidence from two approaches to measurement. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 199-205.
38.
LindeJ. A.StringerD.SimmsL. J.ClarkL. A. (2013). The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality for Youth (SNAP-Y): A new measure for assessing adolescent personality and personality pathology. Assessment, 20, 387-404. doi:10.1177/1073191113489847
39.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401-412. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
40.
MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F.WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139
41.
MarkonK. E.QuiltyL. C.BagbyR. M.KruegerR. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370-383. doi:10.1177/1073-191113486513
42.
MarshH. W.HauK.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
43.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
44.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
45.
MelleyA. H.OltmannsT. F.TurkheimerE. (2002). The Schedule for Adaptive and Nonadaptive Personality (SNAP): Temporal stability and predictive validity of the diagnostic scales. Assessment, 9, 181-187.
46.
MeyerT. J.MillerM. L.MetzgerR. L.BorkovecT. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487-495.
47.
MillerJ. D.ReynoldsS. K.PilkonisP. A. (2004). The validity of the Five-Factor Model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 16, 310-322.
48.
MillerM. W.ResickP. A. (2007). Internalizing and externalizing subtypes in female sexual assault survivors: Implications for the understanding of complex PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 38, 58-71.
49.
MoreyL. C.HopwoodC. J.GundersonJ. G.SkodolA. E.SheaM. T.YenS.. . . McGlashanT. H. (2007). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders. Psychological Medicine, 37, 983-994.
50.
MoreyL. C.HopwoodC. J.MarkowitzJ. G.GundersonJ. G.GriloC. M.McGlashanT. H.. . . SkodolA. E. (2012). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1705-1713. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002601
51.
MoreyL. C.WarnerM. B.SheaM. T.GundersonJ. G.SanislowC. A.GriloC.. . . McGlashanT. H. (2003). The representation of four personality disorders by the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality dimensional model of personality. Psychological Assessment, 15, 326-332.
52.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
53.
Naragon-GaineyK.WatsonD.MarkonK. E. (2009). Differential relations of depression and social anxiety symptoms to the facets of extraversion/positive emotionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 299-310. doi:10.1037/a0015637
54.
O’ConnorB. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 323-345. doi:10.1002/jclp.20017
55.
OltmannsT. F.GleasonM. E. J.KlonskyE. D.TurkheimerE. (2005). Meta-perception for pathological personality traits: Do we know when others think that we are difficult?Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 14, 739-751. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.001
56.
ReadyR. E.ClarkL. A. (2002). Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ratings of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 14, 39-49.
57.
ReadyR. E.ClarkL. A.WatsonD.WesterhouseK. (2000). Self- and peer-related personality: Agreement, trait ratability, and the “self-based heuristic”. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 208-224.
58.
ReynoldsS. K.ClarkL. A. (2001). Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 69, 199-222. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00142
59.
RoE.StringerD.ClarkL. A. (2012). The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality: A useful tool for diagnosis and classification of personality disorder. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ox-fordhb/9780199735013.013.0004
60.
RoselliniA. J.BrownT. A. (2011). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample. Assessment, 18, 27-38. doi:10.1177/1073191110382848
61.
SamuelD. B.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2013). An investigation of the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the five-factor model rating form. Assessment, 20, 24-35. doi:10.1177/1073191112455455
62.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286-308. doi:10.1521/pedi.18.3.286.35446
63.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2006). Clinicians’ judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of the DSM-IV and five-factor models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 298-308. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.298
64.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2011). Clinicians’ use of personality disorder models within a particular treatment setting: A longitudinal comparison of temporal consistency and clinical utility. Personality and Mental Health, 5, 12-28. doi:10.1002/pmh.152
65.
SaulsmanL. M.PageA. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001
66.
SmithG. T.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102-111. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
67.
StöberJ. (1997). Trait anxiety and pessimistic appraisal of risk and chance. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 465-476.
68.
TapscottJ. L.VernonP. A.VeselkaL. (2012). A comparison of the construct validity of two alternative approaches to the assessment of psychopathy in the community. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 541-554. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.668595
69.
WatsonD.GamezW.SimmsL. J. (2005). Basic dimensions of temperament and their relation to anxiety and depression: A symptom-based perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 46-66. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.006
70.
WidigerT. A. (2013). A postmortem and future look at the personality disorders in DSM-5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 382-387. doi:10.1037/per0000030
71.
WidigerT. A.KruegerR. F. (2013). Personality disorders in the DSM-5: Current status, lessons learned, and future challenges. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 341.
72.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62(2), 71-83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71
73.
WiltJ.SchaletB.DurbinC. E. (2010). SNAP trait profiles as valid indicators of personality pathology in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 742-746. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.020
74.
WrightA. G. C.ThomasK. M.HopwoodC. J.MarkonK. E.PincusA. L.KruegerR. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957. doi:10.1037/a0027669
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
