This study explored whether the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition (KABC-II) predicted academic achievement outcomes of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition (KTEA-II) equally well across a representative sample of African American, Hispanic, and Caucasian school-aged children (N = 2,001) in three grade groups (1-4, 5-8, 9-12). It was of interest to study possible prediction bias in the slope and intercept of the five underlying Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) cognitive factors of the KABC-II—Sequential/Gsm (Short-Term Memory), Learning/Glr (Long-Term Storage and Retrieval), Simultaneous/Gv (Visual Processing), Planning/Gf (Fluid Reasoning), and Knowledge/Gc (Crystallized Ability)—in estimating reading, writing, and math. Structural equation modeling techniques demonstrated a lack of bias in the slopes; however, four of the five CHC indexes showed a persistent overprediction of the minority groups’ achievement in the intercept. The overprediction is likely attributable to institutional or societal contributions, which limit the students’ ability to achieve to their fullest potential.
AndradeA. L. M.de MicheliD.da SilvaE. A.de Souza-FormigoniM. L. O.de Oliveira GoeldnerF. (2016). Neural development in adolescence. In de MicheliD.AndradeA. L. M.da SilvaE. A.de Souza-FormigoniM. L. O. (Eds.), Drug abuse in adolescence (pp. 23-33). New York, NY: Springer International.
2.
ArbuckleJ. L. (1995-2011). AMOS 20.0 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: AMOS Development Corporation.
3.
ArbuthnottK. D.KrätzigG. P. (2015). Effective teaching: Sensory learning styles versus general memory processes. Innovative Teaching, 4(2), 1-9.
4.
AshmanA. F.DasJ. P. (1980). Relations between planning and simultaneous-successive processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 371-381.
5.
BinghamG. E.OkagakiL. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 65-95). Chicago, IL: Springer.
6.
BoudD.CohenR.SampsonJ. (Eds.). (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BridgemanB.McCamley-JenkinsL.ErvinN. (2000). Predictions of freshman grade-point average from the revised and recentered SAT I: Reasoning Test (College Board Report 2000–2001). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
8.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CarterR.McCarthyM. (2014). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CentraJ. A.LinnR. L.ParryM. E. (1970). Academic growth in predominantly Negro and predominantly white colleges. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 83-98.
11.
ClearlyT. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115-124. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00613.x
12.
CowenS.FioriS. J. (1991, November). Appropriateness of the SAT in selecting students for admission to California State University, Hayward. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
13.
EdwardsO. W.OaklandT. D. (2006). Factorial invariance of Woodcock-Johnson III scores for African Americans and Caucasian Americans. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 358-366. doi:10.1177/0734282906289595.
14.
ElliottC. D. (2007). DAS–II administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
15.
ElliottJ. G.GathercoleS. E.AllowayT. P.HolemsJ.KirkwoodH. (2010). An evaluation of a classroom-based intervention to help overcome working memory difficulties and improve long-term academic achievement. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 227-250.
16.
FlanaganD. P.McGrewK.OrtizS. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C.DyndaA. (2014). Cognitive assessment: Progress in psychometric theories, the structure of cognitive tests, and approaches to test interpretation. In SaklofskeD.SchweanV.ReynoldsC. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
FloydR. G.EvansJ. J.McGrewK. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155-171.
20.
FloydR. G.ReynoldsM. R.FarmerR. L.KranzlerJ. H. (2013). Are the general factors from different child and adolescent intelligence tests the same? Results from a five-sample, six-test analysis. School Psychology Review, 42, 383-401.
GoldmanR. D.RichardsR. (1974). The SAT prediction of grades for Mexican-American versus Anglo-American students at the University of California, Riverside. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 129-135.
23.
GutkinT. B.ReynoldsC. R. (1981). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for White and Black children from the standardization sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 227-231. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.2.227
24.
HornJ. L.NollJ. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In FlanaganD. P.GensaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53-91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
IsemanJ. S.NaglieriJ. A. (2011). A cognitive strategy instruction to improve math calculation for children with ADHD and LD: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 184-195. doi:10.1177/0022219410391190
26.
JensenA. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY: Free Press.
27.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman assessment battery for children: Interpretive manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
28.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2004a). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
29.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2004b). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition (KTEA-II). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30.
KaufmanA. S.LichtenbergerE. O.Fletcher-JanzenE.KaufmanN. L. (2005). Essentials of KABC-II assessment (Vol. 94). New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
KaufmanS. B.ReynoldsM. R.LiuX.KaufmanA. S.McGrewK. S. (2012). Are cognitive “g” and academic achievement “g” one and the same “g”? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40, 123-138.
32.
KeithT. Z. (1999). Effects of general and specific abilities on student achievement: Similarities and differences across ethnic groups. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 239-262. doi:10.1037/h0089008
33.
KeithT. Z.ReynoldsC. R. (2003). Measurement and design issues in child assessment research. In ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (Ed.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement (2nd ed., pp. 79-111). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
LuriaA. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
35.
LuriaA. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology, and treatment. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
36.
LuriaA. R. (1973). The working brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.
37.
LuriaA. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
MatternK. D.PattersonB. F. (2013). Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: A response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 134-147. doi:10.1037/a0030610.
39.
MaxeyE. J.SawyerR. (1981). Predictive validity of the ACT assessment for Afro-American/, Mexican-American/Chicano, and Caucasian-American/White students (ACT Research Bulletin 81-1). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
40.
McCornackR. L. (1983). Bias in the validity of predicted college grades in four ethnic minority groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 517-522. doi:10.1177/001316448304300220.
41.
McDanielM. A.AgarwalP. K.HuelserB. J.McDermottK. B.RoedigerH. L. (2011) Test-enhanced learning in a middle-school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399-414.
42.
McDanielM. A.ThomasR. C.AgarwalP. K.McDermottK. B.RoedigerH. L. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360-372.
43.
McDermottK. B.AgarwalP. K.D’AntonioL.RoedigerH. L.McDanielM. A. (2014). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 3-21.
44.
McGrewK. S.WendlingB. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What have we learned from the past 20 years of research?Psychology in the Schools, 47, 651-675. doi:10.1002/pits.20497
45.
McRaeS. G. (1981). Simultaneous and sequential processing as related to reading and comprehension skills of second and third grade readers (Unpublished master’s thesis). National College of Education, Chicago, IL.
46.
MeyersL. S.GamstG.GuarinoA. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
MyersT. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 297-310.
48.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Administration and scoring manual. Interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
49.
NaglieriJ. A.JohnsonD. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591-597. doi:10.1177/002221940003300607
50.
NaglieriJ. A.RojahnJ.MattoH. C. (2007). Hispanic and non-Hispanic children’s performance on PASS cognitive processes and achievement. Intelligence, 35, 568-579.
51.
NaglieriJ. A.RojahnJ.MattoH. C.AquilinoS. A. (2005). Black-white differences in cognitive processing: A study of the planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive theory of intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 146-160. doi:10.1177/073428290502300204
52.
Pennock-RománM. (1990). Test validity and language background: A study of Hispanic American students at six universities. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
53.
PoteatG. M.WuenschK. L.GreggN. B. (1988). An investigation of differential prediction with the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 59-68.
54.
RamistL.LewisC.McCamleyL. (1994). Student group differences in predicting college grades. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
55.
ReynoldsC. R.KaiserS. M. (1990). Test bias in psychological assessment. In GutkinT. B.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 486-525). New York, NY: Wiley.
56.
ReynoldsM. R.FloydR. G.NiilekselaC. R. (2013). How well is psychometric g indexed by global composites? Evidence from three popular intelligence tests. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1314-1321.
57.
ReynoldsM. R.KeithT. Z. (2013). Measurement and statistical issues in child assessment research. In SaklofskeD. H.ReynoldsC. R.SchweanV. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents (pp. 48-83). New York, NY: Oxford University.
58.
SackettP. R.SchmittN.EllingsonJ. E.KabinM. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302-318. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.302
59.
ScheiberC. (in press). Do the Kaufman tests of cognitive ability and academic achievement display construct bias across a representative sample of Black, Hispanic, and Caucasian school-age children?Psychological Assessment.
60.
ShawP.GreensteinD.LerchJ.ClasenL.LenrootR.GogtayN. E. E. A.. . . GieddJ. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676-679.
61.
SmithB. L.HollidayW. G.AustinH. W. (2010). Students’ comprehension of science textbooks using a question-based reading strategy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 363-379.
62.
SomervilleL. H.JonesR. M.CaseyB. J. (2010). A time of change: Behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain and Cognition, 72, 124-133.
63.
TaylorA. Z.GrahamS. (2007). An examination of the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers among low-SES African American and Latino students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 52-64.
64.
ThamesA. D.HinkinC. H.ByrdD. A.BilderR. M.DuffK. J.MindtM. R.. . . StreiffV. (2013). Effects of stereotype threat, perceived discrimination, and examiner race on neuropsychological performance: Simple as black and white?Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 583-593.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Digest of education statistics: 2012. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/
67.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2008, June). The condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008-031). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008031.pdf
68.
WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J. (2009). Latent ability grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132-1139.
69.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
70.
WechslerD. (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–third edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
WeissL. G.PrifiteraA. (1995). An evaluation of differential prediction of WIAT achievement scores from WISC-III FSIQ across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 297-304.
73.
WeissL. G.PrifiteraA.RoidG. (1993). The WISC-III and the fairness of predicting achievement across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 397-304.
