The psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were examined in a multiethnic sample of adolescents. Results from confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the original two-factor model did not adequately fit the data. Exploratory factor analyses revealed that four items were not pure markers of the factors.
AllenJ.WalshJ. A. (2000). A construct-based approach to equivalence: Methodologies for cross-cultural/multicultural personality assessment research. In DanaR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment (pp. 63–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
ArellanoA. R.PadillaA. M. (1996). Academic invulnerability among a select group of Latino university students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 485–507.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
4.
BrennerB. (1975). Enjoyment as a preventive of depressive affect. Journal of Community Psychology, 3, 346–357.
5.
BrondoloE.BradyN.ThompsonS.TobinJ.CassellsA.SweeneyM.ContradaR. J. (2008). Perceived racism and negative affect: Analyses of trait and state measures of affect in a community sample. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 150–173.
6.
ByrneB. M. (2005). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17–32.
7.
CrawfordJ. R.HenryJ. D. (2004). The Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265.
8.
CrockerP. R. E. (1997). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with a youth sport sample. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 91–97.
9.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.
10.
DimitrovD. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149.
11.
EngelenU.De PeuterS.VictoirA.Van DiestI.Van Den BerghO. (2006). Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee nederlandstalige versies [Further validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and comparison of two Dutch versions]. Gedrag & Gezondheid: Tijdschrift Voor Psychologie En Gezondheid, 34, 89–102.
12.
GlorfeldL. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377–393.
13.
GrühnD.Kotter-GrühnD.RöckeC. (2010). Discrete affects across the adult lifespan: Evidence for multidimensionality and multidirectionality of affective experiences in young, middle-aged and older adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 492–500.
14.
KammannR.ChristieD.IrwinR.DixonG. (1979). Properties of an inventory to measure happiness (and psychological health). New Zealand Psychologist, 8, 1–9.
LaurentJ.CatanzaroS. J.JoinerT. E. J.RudolphK. D.PotterK. I.LambertS.GathrightT. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338.
17.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
18.
MerzE. L.RoeschS. C. (2011). Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 2–9.
19.
NohS.KasperV.ChenX. (1998). Measuring depression in Korean Immigrants: Assessing validity of the translated Korean version of the CES-D scale. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 32, 358–377.
20.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section (pp. 308–313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
21.
SnyderC. R.HozaB.PelhamW. E.RapoffM.WareL.DanovskyM.StahlK. J. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 399–421.
22.
SnyderC. R.SympsonS. C.YbascoF. C.BordersT. F.BabyakM. A.HigginsR. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335.
23.
SteigerJ. S. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
24.
TalbotL. S.McGlincheyE. L.KaplanK. A.DahlR. E.HarveyA. G. (2010). Sleep deprivation in adolescents and adults: Changes in affect. Emotion, 10, 831–841.
25.
TellegenA.WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297–303.
26.
TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. J. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131–141.
27.
UchidaY.NorasakkunkitV.KitayamaS. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239.
28.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
