The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) has gained significant traction in clinical psychological science. However, HiTOP has not been extensively validated across diverse populations. This study tested measurement invariance—the degree to which latent constructs are measured with equivalence across groups—in HiTOP across racial and ethnic groups using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. These models were followed with rigorous tests of construct validation (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and concurrent) on the latent factors using a Multitrait-Multimethod (MTMM) framework. Comparing across non-Hispanic White (n = 7,166), Hispanic (n = 2,411), and non-Hispanic Black (n = 1,862) youths, the five-factor model comprising Externalizing, Neurodevelopmental, Internalizing, Somatoform, and Detachment factors demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and strict measurement invariance. While each of the five factors demonstrated good evidence of concurrent and convergent validity, evidence for their discriminant validity was not as robust. Establishing measurement invariance and construct validity of the HiTOP model has critical scientific and clinical implications, particularly if dimensions are to be used in addressing mental health disparities in minoritized populations.
AchenbachT. M. (1999). The Child Behavior Checklist and related instruments. In MaruishM. E. (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed., pp. 429–466). Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AchenbachT. M.McConaughyS. H.IvanovaM. Y.RescorlaL. A. (2011). Manual for the ASEBA Brief Problem MonitorTM for Ages 6-18. ASEBA.
3.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2004). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) for ages 1.5 to 18 years. In The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for children and adolescents (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 179–213). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
AhmedN.ConwayC. A. (2020). Medical and mental health comorbidities among minority racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 14(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.5590/JSBHS.2020.14.1.11
5.
AkshoomoffN.BeaumontJ. L.BauerP. J.DikmenS.GershonR.MungasD.SlotkinJ.TulskyD.WeintraubS.ZelazzoP.HeatonR. K. (2013). NIH Toolbox Cognitive Function Battery (CFB): Composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12038
6.
AlaviM.VisentinD. C.ThapaD. K.HuntG. E.WatsonR.ClearyM. (2020). Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), 2209–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399
BagbyR. M.KeeleyJ. W.WilliamsC. C.MortezaeiA.RyderA. G.SellbomM. (2022). Evaluating the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Black Americans and White Americans. Psychological Assessment, 34(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001085
9.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
10.
BernardD. L.CalhounC. D.BanksD. E.HallidayC. A.Hughes-HalbertC.DanielsonC. K. (2021). Making the “C-ACE” for a culturally-informed adverse childhood experiences framework to understand the pervasive mental health impact of racism on Black youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 14, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-020-00319-9
BitskoR. H.HolbrookJ. R.GhandourR. M.BlumbergS. J.VisserS. N.PerouR.WalkupJ. T. (2018). Epidemiology and impact of health care provider-diagnosed anxiety and depression among US children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP, 39(5), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000571
13.
BorsboomD. (2006). When does measurement invariance matter?Medical Care, 44(11), S176–S181.
14.
BrownT. N.SellersS. L.BrownK. T.JacksonJ. S. (2013). Race, ethnicity, and culture in the sociology of mental health. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 167–182). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36223-1_9
15.
BuchananN. T.PerezM.PrinsteinM. J.ThurstonI. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. The American Psychologist, 76(7), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000905
16.
CampbellD. T. (1960). Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 15(8), 546–553.
17.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–104.
18.
CausadiasJ. M.CicchettiD. (2018). Cultural development and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001220
19.
CénatJ. M.BroussardC.JacobG.KoganC.CoraceK.UkwuG.OnesiO.FurykS. E.BekarkhanechiF. M.WilliamsM.ChomienneM.-H.GrenierJ.LabelleP. R. (2024). Antiracist training programs for mental health professionals: A scoping review. Clinical Psychology Review, 108, 102373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102373
20.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
21.
CiceroD. C.RuggeroC. J. (2021). Commentary—Opening a can of worms: The importance of testing the measurement invariance of hierarchical models of psychopathology—a commentary on He and Li (2020). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(3), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13353
22.
CiceroD. C.RuggeroC. J.BallingC. E.BotteraA. R.CheliS.ElkriefL.ForbushK. T.HopwoodC. J.JonasK. G.Jutras-AswadD.KotovR.Levin-AspensonH. F.Mullins-SweattS. N.Johnson-MunguiaS.NarrowW. E.NegiS.PatrickC. J.Rodriguez-SeijasC.ShethS.ThomeczekM. L. (2024). State of the science: The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP). Behavior Therapy, 55(6), 1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2024.05.001
CollC. G.CrnicK.LambertyG.WasikB. H.JenkinsR.GarcíaH. V.McAdooH. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01834.x
25.
ConwayC. C.KotovR.KruegerR. F.CaspiA. (2023). Translating the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP) from potential to practice: Ten research questions. American Psychologist, 78(7), 873–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001046
26.
CrijnenA. A. M.AchenbachT. M.VerhulstF. C. (1999). Problems reported by parents of children in multiple cultures: The Child Behavior Checklist Syndrome constructs. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.4.569
27.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
28.
De Los ReyesA.AugensteinT. M.WangM.ThomasS. A.DrabickD. A. G.BurgersD. E.RabinowitzJ. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498
29.
D’UrsoE. D.De RooverK.VermuntJ. K.TijmstraJ. (2022). Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches. Behavior Research Methods, 54(5), 2114–2145. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01690-7
30.
EatonN. R.KeyesK. M.KruegerR. F.BalsisS.SkodolA. E.MarkonK. E.GrantB. F.HasinD. S. (2012). An invariant dimensional liability model of gender differences in mental disorder prevalence: Evidence from a national sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 282–288. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1037/a0024780
31.
EatonN. R.KeyesK. M.KruegerR. F.NoordhofA.SkodolA. E.MarkonK. E.GrantB. F.HasinD. S. (2013). Ethnicity and psychiatric comorbidity in a national sample: Evidence for latent comorbidity factor invariance and connections with disorder prevalence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(5), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0595-5
32.
FerrandoP. J.Lorenzo-SevaU. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
33.
FischerR.KarlJ. A. (2019). A primer to (cross-cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
34.
FloraD. B.CurranP. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
35.
ForbesM. K.WattsA. L.TwoseM.BarrettA.HudsonJ. L.LynehamH. J.McLellanL.NewtonN. C.SicouriG.ChapmanC.McKinnonA.RapeeR. M.SladeT.TeessonM.MarkonK.SunderlandM. (2024). A hierarchical model of the symptom-level structure of psychopathology in youth. Clinical Psychological Science, 13(2), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241257852
36.
FunkhouserC. J.CorreaK. A.LetkiewiczA. M.CozzaE. M.EstabrookR.ShankmanS. A. (2021). Evaluating the criterion validity of hierarchical psychopathology dimensions across models: Familial aggregation and associations with research domain criteria (sub)constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(6), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000687
GreeneA. L.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.FriedE. I.WattsA. L.KotovR.KruegerR. F. (2022). Model fit is a fallible indicator of model quality in quantitative psychopathology research: A reply to Bader and Moshagen. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131, 696–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000770
39.
GreeneA. L.EatonN. R.LiK.ForbesM. K.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E.WaldmanI. D.CiceroD. C.ConwayC. C.DochertyA. R.FriedE. I.IvanovaM. Y.JonasK. G.LatzmanR. D.PatrickC. J.ReininghausU.TackettJ. L.WrightA. G. C.KotovR. (2019). Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(7), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000434
40.
HeQ.LiJ. J. (2021). Factorial invariance in hierarchical factor models of mental disorders in African American and European American youths. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 62(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13243
41.
HillemeierM. M.FosterE. M.HeinrichsB.HeierB. (2007). Racial differences in parental reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder behaviors. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(5), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e31811ff8b8
42.
HoffmannM. S.MooreT. M.AxelrudL. K.TottenhamN.ZuoX.-N.RohdeL. A.MilhamM. P.SatterthwaiteT. D.SalumG. A. (2021). Reliability and validity of bifactor models of dimensional psychopathology in youth from three continents. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.27.21259601
43.
HoffmannM. S.MooreT. M.Kvitko AxelrudL.TottenhamN.ZuoX.-N.RohdeL. A.MilhamM. P.SatterthwaiteT. D.SalumG. A. (2022). Reliability and validity of bifactor models of dimensional psychopathology in youth. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000749
44.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
45.
IvanovaM. Y.AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A.GuoJ.AlthoffR. R.KanK.-J.AlmqvistF.BegovacI.BrobergA. G.ChahedM.da RochaM. M.DobreanA.DöepfnerM.ErolN.FombonneE.FonsecaA. C.FornsM.FrigerioA.GrietensH.VerhulstF. C. (2019). Testing syndromes of psychopathology in parent and youth ratings across societies. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48(4), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1405352
46.
KaufmanJ. P. D.BirmaherB. M. D.BrentD. M. D.RaoU. M. D.FlynnC. M. A.MoreciP. M. S.W.WilliamsonD. M. A.RyanN. M. D. (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child, 36(7), 980–988.
47.
KimE. S.YoonM. (2011). Testing measurement invariance: A comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557337
48.
KirkR. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002
49.
KotovR.CiceroD. C.ConwayC. C.DeYoungC. G.DombrovskiA.EatonN. R.FirstM. B.ForbesM. K.HymanS. E.JonasK. G.KruegerR. F.LatzmanR. D.LiJ. J.NelsonB. D.RegierD. A.Rodriguez-SeijasC.RuggeroC. J.SimmsL. J.SkodolA. E.WrightA. G. C. (2022). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research. Psychological Medicine, 52(9), 1666–1678. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722001301
50.
KotovR.JonasK. G.CarpenterW. T.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.HobbsK.ReininghausU.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.WidigerT. A.WrightA. G. C.ZaldD. H.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.WorkgroupH. U. (2020). Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20730
51.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.BagbyR. M.BrownT. A.CarpenterW. T.CaspiA.ClarkL. A.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.GoldbergD.HasinD.HymanS. E.IvanovaM. Y.LynamD. R.MarkonK.ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
52.
KruegerR. F.HobbsK. A.ConwayC. C.DickD. M.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.KeyesK. M.LatzmanR. D.MicheliniG.PatrickC. J.SellbomM.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.TackettJ.WaldmanI.WaszczukM. A.WorkgroupH. U. (2021). Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 20(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20844
53.
KyriazosT. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
54.
LaheyB. B.KruegerR. F.RathouzP. J.WaldmanI. D.ZaldD. H. (2017). A hierarchical causal taxonomy of psychopathology across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 142–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000069
55.
Lorenzo-SevaU.ten BergeJ. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
56.
LovikA.NassiriV.VerbekeG.MolenberghsG. (2020). A modified Tucker’s congruence coefficient for factor matching. Methodology, 16(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.2813
MerikangasK. R.HeJ.BursteinM.SwendsenJ.AvenevoliS.CaseB.GeorgiadesK.HeatonL.SwansonS.OlfsonM. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results of the National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006
59.
MicheliniG.BarchD. M.TianY.WatsonD.KleinD. N.KotovR. (2019). Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0593-4
60.
MicheliniG.CarlisiC. O.EatonN. R.ElisonJ. T.HaltiganJ. D.KotovR.KruegerR. F.LatzmanR. D.LiJ. J.Levin-AspensonH. F.SalumG. A.SouthS. C.StantonK.WaldmanI. D.WilsonS. (2024). Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum. World Psychiatry, 23(3), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21225
61.
MooreT. M.KaczkurkinA. N.DurhamE. L.JeongH. J.McDowellM. G.DupontR. M.ApplegateB.TackettJ. L.Cardenas-IniguezC.KardanO.AkcelikG. N.StierA. J.RosenbergM. D.HedekerD.BermanM. G.LaheyB. B. (2020). Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000601
62.
PeughJ.FeldonD. F. (2020). “How well does your structural equation model fit your data?”: Is Marcoulides and Yuan’s equivalence test the answer?CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-01-0016
63.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: DR, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
64.
RingwaldW. R.AbramovitchA.Agelink Van RentergemJ.KotovR. (2024). Do cognitive functions belong in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Model? A meta-analysis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8r2vq
65.
RingwaldW. R.ForbesM. K.WrightA. G. C. (2023). Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model. Psychological Medicine, 53(2), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001902
66.
Rodriguez-SeijasC. A.LiJ. J.BallingC.BrandesC.BernatE.BonessC. L.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.JoynerK. J.KruegerR. F.Levin-AspensonH. F.MicheliniG.RoE.RutterL.StantonK.TackettJ. L.WaszczukM.EatonN. R. (2023). Diversity and the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP). Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00200-0
67.
Rodriguez-SeijasC. A.McClendonJ.WendtD. C.NovacekD. M.EbaluT.HallionL. S.HassanN. Y.HusonK.SpielmansG. I.FolkJ.KhazemL.NeblettE.CunninghamT.Hampton-AndersonJ.SteinmanS.HamiltonJ. L.MekawiY. (2023). The next generation of clinical psychological science: Moving toward antiracism. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mhdx8
68.
RönkköM.ChoE. (2020). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
69.
SchwartzS.MeyerI. H. (2010). Mental health disparities research: The impact of within and between group analyses on tests of social stress hypotheses. Social Science & Medicine, 70(8), 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.032
70.
SimmsL. J.WrightA. G. C.CiceroD.KotovR.Mullins-SweattS. N.SellbomM.WatsonD.WidigerT. A.ZimmermannJ. (2022). Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A collaborative scale development project. Assessment, 29(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211015309
71.
StewartL. C.AsadiS.Rodriguez-SeijasC.WilsonS.MicheliniG.KotovR.CiceroD. C.OlinoT. M. (2024). Measurement invariance of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) across race/ethnicity and sex in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Psychological Assessment, 36(8), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001319
72.
SvetinaD.RutkowskiL.RutkowskiD. (2019). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using M plus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
73.
TackettJ. L.HallquistM. (2022). The need to grow: Developmental considerations and challenges for modern psychiatric taxonomies. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131(6), 660–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000751
74.
TownsendL.KobakK.KearneyC.MilhamM.AndreottiC.EscaleraJ.AlexanderL.GillM. K.BirmaherB.SylvesterR.RiceD.DeepA.KaufmanJ. (2020). Development of three web-based computerized versions of the Kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia child psychiatric diagnostic interview: Preliminary validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.009
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
77.
WaldmanI. D.KingC. D.PooreH. E.LuninghamJ. M.ZinbargR. M.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E.BornovalovaM.ChmielewskiM.ConwayC.DretschM.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK.Naragon-GaineyK.GreeneA. L.HaltiganJ. D.IvanovaM.JoynerK.ZaldD. (2023). Recommendations for adjudicating among alternative structural models of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 11(4), 616–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221144256
78.
WangP. S.LaneM.OlfsonM.PincusH. A.WellsK. B.KesslerR. C. (2005). Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629
79.
WatsonD.ForbesM. K.Levin-AspensonH. F.RuggeroC. J.KotelnikovaY.KhooS.Michael BagbyR.SunderlandM.PatalayP.KotovR. (2022). The development of preliminary HiTOP internalizing spectrum scales. Assessment, 29(1), 17–33.
80.
WatsonD.Levin-AspensonH. F.WaszczukM. A.ConwayC. C.DalgleishT.DretschM. N.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.HobbsK. A.MicheliniG.NelsonB. D.SellbomM.SladeT.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaldmanI.WitthöftM.WrightA. G. C.WorkgroupH. U. (2022). Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20943
81.
WattsA. L.MakolB. A.PalumboI. M.De Los ReyesA.OlinoT. M.LatzmanR. D.DeYoungC. G.WoodP. K.SherK. J. (2022). How robust is the p factor? Using multitrait-multimethod modeling to inform the meaning of general factors of youth psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 10(4), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702621105517
82.
WellerB. E.BlanfordK. L.ButlerA. M. (2018). Estimated prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in U.S. adolescents with depression by race/ethnicity, 2011–2012. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(6), 716–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.12.020
83.
WhitneyD. G.PetersonM. D. (2019). US national and state-level prevalence of mental health disorders and disparities of mental health care use in children. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(4), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5399
84.
Zager KocjanG.JoseP.SocanG.AvsecA. (2021). Measurement invariance of the subjective happiness scale across countries, gender, age, and time. Assessment, 29(4), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121993558
85.
ZimmermannJ.WidigerT. A.OeltjenL.ConwayC. C.MoreyL. C. (2022). Developing preliminary scales for assessing the HiTOP detachment spectrum. Assessment, 29(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211015313
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
