This study used a simulation design to investigate the validity scales of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Undergraduates (N = 192) were randomly assigned to two positive distortion (PD) groups, two negative distortion (ND) groups, and a control group. Controls responded normally, whereas the deception groups responded according to assigned characters. Preliminary analyses indicated no significant differences within distortion valence; thus, the groups were collapsed into single PD (n = 76), ND (n = 79), and control groups (n = 37). Mean-level analyses revealed that, consistent with previous studies, ND profiles are easier to detect than PD profiles. Cutoff scores were suggested, and the classification accuracy of these scores converged with the results of several discriminant function analyses to indicate that Rare Virtues and Deviance predict group membership at least as well as MMPI-2 validity scales. Structural analyses revealed that two moderately correlated factors-positive distortion and negative distortion-underlie scores on these validity scales.
American Psychiatric Association
. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association
. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Baer, R. A.
, & Sekirnjak, G. (1997). Detection of underreporting on the MMPI-2 in a clinical population: Effects of information about validity scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 555-567.
4.
Baer, R. A.
, & Wetter, M. W. (1997). Effects of information about validity scales on underreporting of symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 402-413.
5.
Baer, R. A.
, Wetter, M. W., & Berry, D. T. R. (1992). Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 509-525.
6.
Baer, R. A.
, Wetter, M. W., & Berry, D. T. R. (1995). Effects of information about validity scales on underreporting of symptoms on the MMPI-2: An analogue investigation. Assessment, 2, 189-200.
7.
Bagby, R. M.
, Rogers, R., Buis, T., & Kalemba, V. (1994). Malingered and defensive response styles on the MMPI-2: An examination of validity scales. Assessment, 1, 31-38.
8.
Berry, D. T. R.
, Baer, R. A., & Harris, M. J. (1991). Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 585-598.
9.
Butcher,J. N.
, Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham,J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Manualfor administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
Clark, L. A.
(1993). Schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality (SNAP). Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
Clark, L. A.
, & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
12.
Clark, L. A.
, Livesley, W. J., Schroeder, M. L., & Irish, S. (1996). The structure of maladaptive personality traits: Convergent validity between two systems. Psychological Assessment, 8, 294-303.
13.
Clark, L. A.
, McEwen, J. L., Collard, L. M., & Hickok, G. (1993). Symptoms and traits of personality disorder: Two new methods for their assessment. Psychological Assessment, 5, 81-91.
14.
Clark, L. A.
, Vorhies, L., & McEwen, J. L. (1994). Personality disorder symptomatology from the five-factor model perspective. In P. T. Costa, Jr., & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 95-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Cohen,J.
(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
16.
Crowne, D. P.
, & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
17.
Crowne, D. P.
, & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.
18.
Finn, S. E.
(1982). Base rates, utilities, and DSM-III: Shortcomings of fixed-rule systems of psychodiagnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 294-302
19.
Hathaway, S. R.
, & McKinley, J. C. (1951). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual (rev.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
Lamb, D. G.
, Berry, D. T. R., Wetter, M. W., & Baer, R. A. (1994). Effects of two types of information on malingering of closed head injury on the MMPI-2: An analog investigation. Psychological Assessment, 6, 8-13.
21.
Linde,J. A.
, Moran, P.J., & Clark, L. A. (1996, September). SNAP and MMPI-2 PSY-5: Comparison in clinical and college samples. Poster presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Society for Research in Psychopathology, Atlanta, GA.
22.
Meehl, P. E.
, & Hathaway, S. R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525-564.
23.
Moes, G. S.
, Lall, R., &Johnson, W. B. (1996). Personality characteristics of successful Navy submarine personnel. Military Medicine, 161, 239-242.
24.
Nichols, D. S.
, & Greene, R. L. (1997). Dimensions of deception in personality assessment: The example of the MMPI-2.Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 251-266.
25.
Oltmanns, T. F.
, Turkheimer, E., & Fiedler, E. R. (1999, September). Peer assessment of personality disorders: Predictive validity. Paper presented at the 6th International Congress on the Disorders of Personality, Geneva, Switzerland.
26.
Paulhus, D. L.
(1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
27.
Paulhus, D. L. (1994). Balanced inventory of desirable responding. Reference manual for BIDR version 6. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
28.
Putzke, J. D.
, Williams, M. A., Daniel, F. J., & Boll, T. J. (1999). The utility of K-correction to adjust for a defensive response set on the MMPI. Assessment, 6, 61-70.
29.
Reynolds, S. K.
, & Clark, L. A. (in press). Predicting personality disorder dimensions from domains and facets of the five-factor model.Journal of Personality.
30.
Rogers, R.
(1997). Researching dissimulation. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 398-426). New York: Guilford.
31.
Rogers, R.
, Sewell, K. W., & Salekin, R. T. (1994). A meta-analysis of malingering on the MMPI-2. Assessment, 1, 227-237.
32.
Rogers, R.
, Sewell, K. W., & Salekin, R. T. (1995). A meta-analysis of malingering on the MMPI-2: Erratum. Assessment, 2, 201-201.
33.
Rogers, R.
, Sewell, K. W., & Ustad, K. L. (1995). Feigning among chronic outpatients on the MMPI-2: A systematic examination of fake-bad indicators. Assessment, 2, 81-89.
34.
Taylor, S. E.
, & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and wellbeing: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
35.
Vittengl, J. R.
, Clark, L. A., Owen-Salters, E., & Gatchel, R. J. (1999). Diagnostic change and personality stability following functional restoration treatment in a chronic low back pain patient sample. Assessment, 6, 79-92.
