Can the MMPI-2 Validity Scales Detect Depression Feigned by Experts?

Abstract

Major depression is one of the most frequently presented disorders for claims of psychiatric disability. Evidence also suggests that many individuals making claims of disability exaggerate or even fabricate mental illness. These facts suggest that the detection of feigned depression is an important task in psychiatric disability claim assessments. In this study, the capacity of a number of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to detect feigned depression was examined. Twenty-three mental health professionals with specific expertise and significant experience in assessing and treating major depression were asked to complete the MMPI-2 as if they were suffering from major depression. The MMPI-2 protocols of this sample were compared to those of a sample of patients diagnosed with major depression. Results indicated that the validity scales F, back F (FB), and the Dissimulation scale (Ds) were highly successful at distinguishing MMPI-2 protocols of feigned depression from bona fide depression. Replicating results from previous studies, however, FB proved most effective, outperforming all other validity scales and indicators, including F and Ds. These findings suggest that even experts are unable to feign major depression successfully on the MMPI-2, and that the FB scale might be the most effective indicator for detecting feigned depression.

Keywords

Malingering depression MMPI-2 validity scales disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association . (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Arbisi, P. A. , & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The Infrequency-Psychopathology Scale, F(p) scale. Psychological Assessment, 7, 424-431.

Bagby, R. M. , Nicholson, R. A. , & Buis, T. (1998). Utility of the deceptive-subtle items in the detection of malingering. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 405-415.

Bagby, R. M. , Rogers, R. , Buis, T. , Nicholson, R. A. , Cameron, S. L. , Rector, N. A. , Schuller, D. R. , & Seeman, M. V. (1997). Detecting feigned depression and schizophrenia on the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 650-664.

Berry, D. T. R. , Baer, R. A. , & Harris, M. J. (1991). Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 585-598.

Butcher, J. N. , Dahlstrom, W. G. , Graham, J. R. , Tellegan, A. , & Kaerfimer B. (1989). Manualfor administration and scoring of the MMPI-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Dannenbaum, S. E. , & Lanyon, R. I. (1993). The use of subtle items in detecting deception. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 501-510.

Gough, H. G. (1950). The F minus K dissimulation index for the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14, 408-413.

Gough, H. G. (1954). Some common misconceptions about neuroticism. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 287-292.

10.

Griffin, G. A. E. , Normington, J. , May, R. , & Glassmire, D. (1996). Assessing dissimulation among social security disability income applicants. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1425-1430.

11.

Kessler, R. C. , McGonagle, K. A. , Zhao, S. , Nelson, C. B. , Hughes, M. , Eshleman, S. , Wittchen, H. , & Kendler, K. S. (1994). Life-time and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorder in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8-19.

12.

Lees-Haley, P. , English, L. T. , & Glenn, W. J. (1991). A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68, 203-210.

13.

Rogers, R. , Bagby, R. M. , & Chakraborty, D. (1993). Feigning schizophrenic disorders on the MMPI-2: Detection of coached simulators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 215-226.

14.

Wiener, D. N. (1948). Subtle and obvious keys for the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 164-170.