The purpose of this study was to characterize the operating characteristics of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity scales in distinguishing simulators feigning symptoms of traumatic brain injury (TBI) while completing the PAI (n = 84) from a clinical sample of patients with TBI who achieved adequate scores on performance validity tests (n = 112). The simulators were divided into two groups: (a) Specific Simulators feigning cognitive and somatic symptoms only or (b) Global Simulators feigning cognitive, somatic, and psychiatric symptoms. The PAI overreporting scales were indeed sensitive to the simulation of TBI symptoms in this analogue design. However, these scales were less sensitive to the feigning of somatic and cognitive TBI symptoms than the feigning of a broad range of cognitive, somatic, and emotional symptoms often associated with TBI. The relationships of TBI simulation to consistency and underreporting scales are also explored.
Armistead-JehleP. (2010). Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI. Applied Neuropsychology, 17, 52-59.
2.
Armistead-JehleP.GervaisR. O.GreenP. (2012). Memory Complaints Inventory results as a function of symptom validity test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 101-113.
3.
BerryD. T. R.ButcherJ. N. (1998). Detection of feigning of head injury symptoms on the MMPI-2. In ReynoldsC. R. (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 209-238). New York, NY: Plenum.
4.
BerryD. T. R.WetterM. W.BaerR. A.YoungjohnJ. R.GassC. S.LambD. G.. . .BuccholzD. (1995). Overreporting of closed-head injury symptoms on the MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 7, 517-523.
5.
BushS. S.RuffR. M.TrosterA. I.BarthJ. T.KofflerS. P.PliskinN. H.. . .SilverC. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419-426.
6.
CashelM. L.RogersR.SewellK.Martin-CanniciC. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333-342.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
DearthC. S.BerryD. T.VickeryC. D.VagniniV. L.BaserR. E.OreyS. A.. . .CragarD. E. (2005). Detection of feigned head injury symptoms on the MMPI-2 in head injured patients and community controls. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 95-110.
9.
DelisD. C.KramerJ. H.KaplanE.OberB. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II)–Second Edition: Adult version. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
10.
DemakisG. J.HammondF.KnottsA.CooperD. B.ClementP.KennedyJ.SawyerT. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 123-130.
11.
GreenP.RohlingM. L.Lees-HaleyP. R.AllenL. M.III. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15, 1045-1060.
12.
GreiffensteinM. F.BakerW. J.GolaT. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesic measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.
13.
GreiffensteinM. F.BakerW. J.GolaT.DondersJ.MillerL. (2002). The Fake Bad scale in atypical and severe closed head injury litigants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1591-1600.
14.
GreiffensteinM. F.GolaT.BakerW. G. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 230-240.
15.
GreveK. W.BianchiniK. J.LoveJ. M.BrennanA.HeinlyM. T. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 491-512.
16.
HaggertyK. A.FrazierT. W.BuschR. M.NaugleR. I. (2007). Relationships among Victoria Symptom Validity Test indices and Personality Assessment Inventory validity scales in a large clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 917-928.
17.
HawesS. W.BoccacciniM. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21, 112-124.
HoffmanR. G.ScottJ. G.EmickM. A.AdamsR. L. (1999). The MMPI-2 and closed head injury: Effects of litigation and head injury severity. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 3-13.
20.
IversonG. L. (2006). Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 77-90.
21.
KurtzJ. E.ShealyS. E.PutnamS. H. (2007). Another look at paradoxical severity effects in head injury with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 66-73.
22.
LangeR. T.PancholiS.BhagwatA.Anderson-BarnesV.FrenchL. M. (2012). Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 453-466.
23.
LarrabeeG. (2003a). Detection of symptom exaggeration with the MMPI-2 in litigants with malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 54-68.
24.
LarrabeeG. (2003b). Exaggerated MMPI-2 symptom report in personal injury litigants with malingered neurocognitive deficit. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 673-686.
25.
Lees-HaleyP. R.EnglishL. T.GlennW. J. (1991). A Fake Bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68, 203-210.
26.
MalecJ. F.BrownA. W.LeibsonC. L.FlaadaJ. T.MandrekarJ. N.DiehlN. N.PerkinsP. K. (2007). The Mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. Journal of Neurotrauma, 24, 1417-1424.
27.
McCaffreyR. J.O’BryantS. E.AshendorfL.FisherJ. M. (2003). Correlations among the TOMM, Rey-15, and MMPI-2 validity scales in a sample of TBI litigants. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3, 45-53.
28.
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86-87.
29.
MittenbergW.PattonC.CanyockE. M.ConditD. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1102.
30.
MooreB. A.DondersJ. (2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 975-984.
MoreyL. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
33.
NelsonN. W.SweetJ. J.BerryD. T.BryantF. B.GranacherR. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 440-449.
34.
NelsonN. W.SweetJ. J.DemakisG. J. (2006). Meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 Fake Bad scale: Utility in forensic practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 39-58.
35.
RogersR. (1997). Researching dissimulation. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 398-426). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
RogersR.CruiseK. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation designs: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 273-285.
37.
RogersR.OrnduffS. R.SewellK. W. (1993). Feigning specific disorders: A study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 554-560.
38.
RogersR.SewellK. W.CruiseK. R.WangE. W.UstadK. L. (1998). The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings. Assessment, 5, 399-405.
39.
RogersR.SewellK. W.MoreyL. C.UstadK. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 629-640.
40.
RootJ. C.RobbinsR. N.ChangL.van GorpW. G. (2006). Detection of inadequate effort on the California Verbal Learning Test–Second Edition: Forced choice recognition and critical item analysis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 688-696.
41.
RossS. R.MillisS. R.KrukowskiR. A.PutnamS. H.AdamsK. M. (2004). Detecting incomplete effort on the MMPI-2: An examination of the Fake-Bad scale in mild head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 115-124.
42.
SchroederR. W.Twumasi-AnkrahP.BaadeL. E.MarshallP. S. (2012). Reliable digit span: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment, 19, 21-30.
43.
SlickD. J.HoppG.StraussE.SpellacyF. J. (1996). Victoria symptom validity test: Efficiency for detecting feigned memory impairment and relationship to neuropsychological tests and MMPI-2 validity scales. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 911-922.
44.
SuhrJ. A.GunstadJ. (2000). The effects of coaching on the sensitivity and specificity of malingering measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 415-424.
45.
SumantiM.BooneK. B.SavodnikI.GorsuchR. (2006). Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers’ compensation “stress” claim sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 754-765.
46.
SwetsJ. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
47.
TillC.ChristensenB. K.GreenR. E. (2009). Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 23, 655-665.
48.
TombaughT. N. (1996). The test of memory malingering. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
49.
VelikonjaD.WarrinerE.BrumC. (2010). Profiles of emotional and behavioral sequelae following acquired brain injury: Cluster analysis of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 610-621.
50.
WhitesideD. M.Dunbar-MayerP.WatersD. P. (2009). Relationship between TOMM performance and PAI validity scales in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 523-533.
51.
WhitesideD. M.GalbreathJ.BrownM.TurnbullJ. (2012). Differential response patterns on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in compensation-seeking and non-compensation-seeking mild traumatic brain injury patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 172-182.
52.
YoungjohnJ. R.DavisD.WolfI. (1997). Head Injury and the MMPI-2: Paradoxical severity effects and the influence of litigation. Psychological Assessment, 9, 177-184.
