This article teases out the relationship between family form and the state's social safety nets around healthcare, showing the deep unfairness of measuring social safety nets by whether a couple marries. By continuing to tie healthcare benefits to specific family structures, we perpetuate the “galloping” inequality marking America today.
This article concludes that, whatever happens with the thousands of benefits given to married couples in other domains, social policy should move beyond marriage with respect to healthcare. Delinking support for healthcare coverage and services from family form is just, better assists struggling families, and is in our collective self-interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
See generally C.Huntington, “Postmarital Family Law: A Legal Structure for Nonmarital Families,”Stanford Law Review67, no. 1 (2015): 167–240, at 171-172.
2.
See, e.g., R.Balkus and S.Wilschke, Treatment of Married Couples in the SSI Program, Social Security Office of Policy (December2003), available at <https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/issuepapers/ip2003-01.html> (last visited July 25, 2018).
W. BradfordWilcox and W.Wang, The Marriage Divide: How and Why Working-Class Families Are More Fragile Today, American Enterprise Institute (Sep. 25, 2017), available at <http://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/The-Marriage-Divide.pdf> (last visited July 25, 2018): at 3.
12.
Id.
13.
Id. at 13.
14.
Id.
15.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2608 (2015).
16.
United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675, 2683 (2013).
26 U.S.C. §152(d)(3) (defining dependent); Letter from Department of the Treasury to U.S. House of Representatives, no. 2016-0008 (2016), available at <https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/16-0008.pdf> (last visited April 23, 2018); Publication 501 (2017), Exemptions, Standard Deduction, and Filing Information, IRS, available at <https://www.irs.gov/publications/p501#en_US_publink1000220868> (last visited July 25, 2018) (describing qualifying dependents).
Illinois Medicaid Expansion (under the ACA) treats as eligible persons at or below 138% of FPL, regardless of whether they have children or other “categorical” qualifications — equating to $16,753 in annual income for a single person. Medical Programs, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, available at <https://www.illinois.gov/hfs/Medical-Clients/Pages/medicalprograms.aspx> (last visited July 25, 2018). See also HealthCare.gov, supra note 29.
HealthCare.gov, supra note 29 (noting that “sometimes” a household includes “an unmarried domestic partner,” but “only if you have a child together or you'll claim your partner as a tax dependent”); see supra note 20.
J. C.Barnett and E. R.Berchick, Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2016, Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau (Sept. 2017): at 8.
E.Warren, “Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study,”American Journal of Medicine122, no. 6 (2009): 741–746, at 744, available at <http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(09)00404-5/fulltext> (last visited July 26, 2018).
55.
Id. at 744.
56.
Id. at 743.
57.
Id. at 742.
58.
M. J.White, “Bankruptcy: Past Puzzles, Recent Reforms, and the Mortgage Crisis,”American Law and Economics Review11, no. 1 (2009): 1–23, at 7.
D. D.Hackney, D.Friesner, and E. H.Johnson, “What is the Actual Prevalence of Medical Bankruptcies?,”International Journal of Social Economics43, no. 12 (2016): 1284–1299, at 1289.
61.
Id. at 1291.
62.
11 U.S.C. §1325(b)(4).
63.
C. J.Tabb, Law of Bankruptcy (St. Paul, Minn: West Academic Publishing, 2016): at 87, 98.
64.
11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(6), 707(b)(7).
65.
11 U.S.C. §303(a).
66.
M. T.Reilly, “You And Me Against the World: Marriage and Divorce from Creditors' Perspective,” in Reconceiving the Family: Critique on the American Law Institute's Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution, edited by Robin FretwellWilson (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006): 195.
11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(i)(presuming abuse when debtors current monthly income less monthly expenses exceeds certain amounts).
70.
D.Carlson, “Means Testing: The Failed Bankruptcy Revolution of 2005,”Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 178 (January9, 2007), available athttps://ssrn.com/abstract=956158 (last visited July 26, 2018).
71.
In re Napier, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2248 (Bankr. S.C. 2006); Carlson, supra note 70.
72.
In re Allocco, 2018 Bankr. LEXIS 1446 at 20-21 (Bankr. N.J.).
73.
In re Mastromarino, 197 B.R. 171, 178-79 (Bank. Me. 1996); DeAngelis v. Ramsay, 440 B.R. 85, 94 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2010).
74.
See 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
75.
In re Schumacher, 495 B.R. 735, 742 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2013).
76.
11 U.S.C. § 101(10A); Statement of U.S. Trustee, supra note 68.
77.
C. A.Schneider, “The Channeling Function in Family Law,”Hofstra Law Review20, no. 3 (1992): 495-532.
