Interior design (ID) pedagogy should include theories and applications, which advance human health and wellness in the built environment. Design for wellness and well-being is referenced in 5 of the 13 Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) knowledge application standards. This focus on wellness was amplified during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic experience, which elevated our collective understanding of contagions, disease transmission, sanitation practices, vaccination efficacy, and immunity, as well as the devastating turmoil—social, economic, and psychological—of the pandemic’s tragic spread. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine ID educators’ attitudes, intentions, and behaviors related to teaching wellness and to determine if the pandemic impacted wellness pedagogy. For this mixed methods study, we employed an online survey (n = 86) followed by participant interviews (n = 11). Data from the questionnaire and interviews suggested that peer attitudes toward wellness were a significant factor that influenced teaching behavior. Teaching intentions were predicted by prior teaching, attitudes, and perceived behavioral control (ability to teach wellness). Although experience with the pandemic was not a predictor of teaching behavior, it did surface as a strong motivator for future teaching adjustments. Findings also showed wide-ranging understandings and definitions of wellness-related themes. Implications for design programs seeking to equip faculty with the tools needed to integrate wellness more deeply into ID curricula are discussed.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
2.
AltamimiS.OnurZ. Ü.OzsahinD. U.UzunB. (2022). Socio-spatial interactions within modern workspace interiors post COVID 19. In OzsahinD. U.UzunB.SanlidagT.LaMoreauxJ. (Eds.), Decision analysis applied to the field of environmental health (pp. 125–134). Springer.
3.
AntunesS.BarretoS. (2022). Design education: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In RaposoD.NevesJ.SilvaJ. (Eds.), Perspectives on design II. Springer series in design and innovation (Vol. 16, pp. 147–160). Springer.
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
5.
AsojoA.VoH. (2021). Pedagogy + reflection: A problem-based learning case in interior design. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v12i2.25372
6.
AsojoA. O. (2007). Technology as a tool for globalization: Cross-cultural collaborative design studio projects. Journal of Interior Design, 33(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2007.tb00319.x
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
8.
BazilleH. (2021). The impact of WELL design strategies on employee satisfaction with interior environmental quality and perceived health and well-being: A multi-office pre-versus post-occupancy study. Building and Environment, 224, 10953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109539
9.
BrooksS. K.WebsterR. K.SmithL. E.WoodwardL.WesselyS.GreenbergN.RubinG. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
10.
CampbellN. M. (2014). Designing retirement community third places: Attributes impacting how well social spaces are liked and used. Journal of Interior Design, 39(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12035
11.
CandidoC.MarzbanS.HaddadS.MackeyM.LoderA. (2020). Designing healthy workspaces: Results from Australian certified open-plan offices. Facilities, 39(5/6), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2020-0018
12.
CeladynM. (2020). Integrative design classes for environmental sustainability of interior architectural design. Sustainability, 12(18), 7383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187383
ClemonsS. A.EckmanM. (2004). Toward a common language: Proposed index categories to enhance dissemination and retrieval of interior design scholarship. Journal of Interior Design, 30(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2004.tb00402.x
18.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
de KoningR.EgizA.KotechaJ.CiuculeteA. C.OoiS. Z. Y.BankoleN. D. A.ErhaborJ.HigginbothamG.KhanM.DalleD. U.SichimbaD.BandyopadhyayS.KanmounyeU. S. (2021). Survey fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of neurosurgery survey response rates. Frontiers in Surgery, 8, 690680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.690680
21.
DienerE.WirtzD.Biswas-DienerR.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS. (2009). New measures of well-being. In DienerE. (Ed.), Assessing well-being. Social indicators research series (Vol. 39, pp. 247–266). Springer.
22.
DietzL.HorveP. F.CoilD. A.FretzM.EisenJ. A.Van Den WymelenbergK. (2020). 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: Built environmental considerations to reduce transmission. Applied and Environmental Science, 5(2), e00245-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00245-20
23.
DunnR.HattieJ.BowlesT. (2018). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore teachers’ intentions to engage in ongoing teacher professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.10.001
24.
ElharakeJ. A.AkbarF.MalikA. A.GilliamW.OmerS. B. (2022). Mental health impact of COVID-19 among children and college students: A systematic review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01297-1
GaleA. J.DuffeyM. A.Park-GatesS.PeekP. F. (2017). Soft skills versus hard skills: Practitioners’ perspectives on interior design interns. Journal of Interior Design, 42(4), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12105
27.
GaleA. J.MartinD.MartinK.DuffeyM. A. (2014). The burnout phenomenon: A comparative study of student attitudes toward collaborative learning and sustainability. Journal of Interior Design, 39(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12022
28.
GodinG.ValoisP.LepageL.DesharnaisR. (1992). Predictors of smoking behavior: An application of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Addiction, 87(9), 1335–1343.
29.
GreavesM.ZibarrasL. D.StrideC. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003.
30.
GuerinD. A.MartinC. S. (2004). The career cycle approach to defining the interior design profession’s body of knowledge. Journal of Interior Design, 30(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2004.tb00396.x
31.
GurelM. (2010). Explorations in teaching sustainable design: A studio experience in interior design/architecture. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01649.x
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
34.
HansmanC. A. (2001). Context-based adult learning. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 89, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7
35.
HicksS. S. (2022). Interior design: Living in poverty and the absence of health, safety, and welfare. Journal of Interior Design, 47(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12214
HuberA. M. (2021). Exploring informed-design services during the project-defining phases in commercial interior design. Journal of Interior Design, 46(2), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12191
38.
HughesM.C.HenryB. W.KushnickM. R. (2020). Teaching during the pandemic? An opportunity to enhance curriculum. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 6(4), 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920950179
JinH. Y.SuC. Y.ChenC. H. (2021). Perceptions of teachers regarding the perceived implementation of creative pedagogy in “making” activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872471
42.
KimD.LeeJ. H.HaM. (2014). Exploring perceptions of designers and medical staff in South Korea about design elements for the elder-friendly hospital. Journal of Interior Design, 39(4), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12034
43.
KingE.MobleyC.ScullinM. K. (2019). The 8-hour challenge: Incentivizing sleep during end-of-term assessments. Journal of Interior Design, 44(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12135
LeeJ.CerretoF. A.LeeJ. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers’ decisions regarding use of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.1.152
LeiQ.LauS. S. Y.YuanC.QiY. (2022). Post-occupancy evaluation of the biophilic design in the workplace for health and wellbeing. Buildings, 12(4), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040417
50.
LomaxS.CafaroC. L.HassenN.WhitlowC.MagidK.JaffeG. (2022). Centering mental health in society: A human rights approach to well-being for all. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 92(3), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000618
51.
LópezD. E. R. (2023). Interior design as a relegated discipline in the academic and professional stage in Colombia. Journal of Interior Design. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12228
52.
MatthewsC.HillC.FrederiksenD. (2017). Niche housing as social prosthetic for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender seniors: Resident motivations and perceptions. Journal of Interior Design, 42(3), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12088
53.
McGeeB.ParkN. K.PortilloM.BoschS.SwisherM. (2019). Diy biophilia: Development of the biophilic interior design matrix as a design tool. Journal of Interior Design, 44(4), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12159
54.
MegahedN. A.GhoneimE. M. (2020). Antivirus-built environment: Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
MetinalY. B.AyalpG. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on architectural education: Bibliometric and content analyses. Open House International, 47(4), 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0120
57.
MorganG. T.ColemanS.RobinsonJ. B.TouchieM. F.PolandB.JakubiecA.MacdonaldS.LachN.CaoY. (2022). Wellbeing as an emergent property of social practice. Buildings and Cities, 3(1), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.262
58.
NehmeJ. B.IrribarraT. D.CumsilleP.YoonS. Y. (2021). Waiting room physical environment and outpatient experience: The spatial user experience model as analytical tool. Journal of Interior Design, 46(4), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12205
59.
NotaniA. S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-anaysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247–271.
60.
NunnallyJr, J. C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. McGraw-Hill.
PressleyT.HaC. (2021). Teaching during a pandemic: United States teachers’ self-efficacy during COVID-19. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021
63.
QuanX.JosephA.NandaU. (2017). Developing evidence-based tools for designing and evaluating hospital inpatient rooms. Journal of Interior Design, 42(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12091
SadafA.GezerT. (2020). Exploring factors that influence teachers’ intentions to integrate digital literacy using the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1719244
67.
SahuP. (2020). Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4), e7541. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
68.
SaldanaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
69.
SchifterD. E.AjzenI. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843.
70.
Schmitz-CrawfordD. A.ThompsonA. D.LindstromD. L. (2021). Condolences and congratulations: Covid-19 pressures on higher education faculty. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(2), 84–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1911556
71.
SchneidermanD.FreihoeferK. (2012). A pre- and post-evaluation of integrating sustainability curriculum by inserting Okala modules into an interior design materials and methods course. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211262344
72.
ScolereL.MalininL. (2022). The building that teaches: Exploring augmented reality affordances in academic incubators. Journal of Interior Design. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12229
73.
ShiueY. M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453. https://doi.org/10.2190/A407-22RR-50X6-2830
74.
SmithD.MacdonaldJ. (2015). Design as a rehabilitative tool for people with acquired brain injury: Mapping the field. Journal of Interior Design, 40(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12048
75.
SommerL. (2011). The theory of planned behavior and the impact of past behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i1.930
76.
SonC.HegdeS.SmithA.WangX.SasangoharF. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college students’ mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e21279. https://doi.org/10.2196/21279
77.
SwaimJ. A.MaloniM. J.NapshinS. A.HenleyA. B. (2014). Influences on student intention and behavior towards environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 465–484. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24033283
78.
TackxE.NguyenP.HeylighenA. (2022). Student life on the Autism Spectrum: Exploring the role of student housing in experiences of three students. Journal of Interior Design, 47(4), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12227
79.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
80.
TeoT.ZhouM.NoyesJ. (2016). Teachers and technology: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior. Education Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5
81.
ThibautL.KnipprathH.DehaeneW.DepaepeF. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
82.
UlusoyB. (2023). Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on students’ written outcomes: An interior architecture research/theory module case study in the UK. Education Sciences, 13(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010071
83.
WinfieldJ. D.ParisJ. H. (2021). A mixed-method analysis of burnout and turnover among higher-education professionals during Covid-19. Journal of Education Human Resources. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2021-0048
