Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Rail traffic controllers perform a myriad of tasks from passive monitoring of the rail traffic systems to short-term intervention to respond to an issue. Measuring their mental demands, and the effects of workload on their performance is critically important. Therefore, using eye-tracking metrics and DLR-Workload Assessment Tool (DLR-WAT) we measured and analyzed the mental workload of nine novice and nine expert traffic controllers as they performed traffic control tasks in a rail traffic simulator while managing sparse versus dense train traffic and solving safety issues on the tracks. Eye tracking metrics identified workload in high difficulty tasks whereas DLR-WAT scores signified the differences between novices and experts. DLR-WAT was also useful in identifying different functions of the tasks. Integrating eye tracking metrics with subjective measures of workload can help in better understanding the dynamic interplay between task difficulty and differences in between individuals in the control center.

Keywords

cognitive load measurement human factors in rail transportation DLR-Workload assessment tool (DLR-WAT)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

R. M.

Santini

Kübler

T. C.

Kasneci

Srinivasa

Admoni

(2018). Eye-hand behavior in human-robot shared manipulation. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 4–13.

Brandenburger

Dreßler

Grippenkoven

J. D.

(2023). DLR workload assessment tool (DLR-WAT) – official English version. German Aerospace Center (DLR).

Crawford

E. G. C.

Kift

R. L.

(2018). Keeping track of railway safety and the mechanisms for risk. Railway Safety, 110, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.004

Devlin

S. P.

Brown

N. L.

Drollinger

Sibley

Alami

Riggs

S. L.

(2022). Scan-based eye tracking measures are predictive of workload transition performance. Applied Ergonomics, 105, 103829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103829

Hart

S. G.

(2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. 50(9), 904–908.

Krejtz

Duchowski

A. T.

Niedzielska

Biele

Krejtz

(2018). Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze. PLOS ONE, 13(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203629

Marquart

Cabrall

de Winter

(2015). Review of Eye-related Measures of Drivers’ Mental Workload. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015, 3, 2854–2861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.783

Pagnotta

Jacobs

D. M.

de Frutos

P. L.

Rodríguez

Ibáñez-Gijón

Travieso

(2022). Task difficulty and physiological measures of mental workload in air traffic control: A scoping review. Ergonomics, 65(8), 1095–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.2016998

SAS Institute Inc. (2022). JMP® (Version 7) [Computer software]. SAS Institute Inc. https://www.jmp.com/en_us/software/data-analysis-software.html

10.

Shiferaw

Downey

Crewther

(2019). A review of gaze entropy as a measure of visual scanning efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.007

11.

The MathWorks, Inc. (2024). MATLAB (Version R2024b) [Computer software]. https://www.mathworks.com

12.

Tobii

(2019). Tobii Pro Lab (Version 1.130.24185) [Computer software]. Tobii AB. https://www.tobii.com/

Quantifying Mental Workload in Rail Traffic Control: An Eye-tracking Investigation under varying Task Demands and Expertise Levels

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References