This study evaluated the application of indoor navigation design guidelines for individuals with disabilities using a custom-developed app, FIND, as a testbed. Twenty-five participants with or without disabilities completed five use-case scenarios while performance data and qualitative feedback were collected. Results supported several key guidelines related to consistency, user control, and real-world alignment, while also identifying areas for improvement. The findings of this study, in terms of guidelines, can be used by developers and researchers when designing indoor navigation technologies to better cater to the diverse needs of individuals with disabilities.
AbrahamA.NamboodiriV. (2023). An accessible BLE Beacon-based indoor wayfinding system. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, 11, 260–275.
2.
AndersonM.PerrinA. (2021). Disabled Americans are less likely to own some digital devices. Pew Research Center.
3.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Consumer Technology Association. (2020). ANSI/CTA-2076.1: Accessible wayfinding systems for persons with disabilities—Implementation guidelines. Consumer Technology Association.
7.
Garcia-SanjuanF.JaenJ.NacherV. (2017). Tangibot: A tangible-mediated robot to support cognitive games for ageing people—a usability study. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 34, 91–105.
8.
GiannoumisG. A.FeratiM.PandyaU.KrivonosD.PeyT. (2018). Usability of indoor network navigation solutions for persons with visual impairments. In LangdonP.LazarJ.HeylighenA.DongH. (Eds.), Breaking down barriers. CWUAAT 2018. Springer.
9.
LeeG.-B.JangH.JeongH.WooW. (2021). Designing a multi-modal communication system for the deaf and hard-of-hearing users [Conference session]. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Bari, Italy.
10.
NanayakkaraS. C.WyseL.OngS. H.TaylorE. A. (2013). Enhancing musical experience for the hearing-impaired using visual and haptic displays. Human–Computer Interaction, 28(2), 115–160.
11.
NasrV.ZahabiM. (2022). Usability evaluation methods of indoor navigation apps for people with disabilities: A scoping review [Conference session]. 2022 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), Orlando, FL, USA.
OhlssonS. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2), 241.
15.
Rodriguez-SánchezM. C.Martinez-RomoJ. (2017). GAWA–Manager for accessibility wayfinding apps. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 505–519.
16.
ShahiniF.NasrV.ZahabiM. (2022). A friendly indoor navigation app for people with disabilities (FIND) [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA.
17.
SilvaC. S.WimalaratneP. (2020). Context-aware assistive indoor navigation of visually impaired persons. Sensors and Materials, 32, 1497.
18.
StevensA. C.CarrollD. D.Courtney-LongE. A.ZhangQ. CSloanM. L.Griffin-BlakeS.PeacockG. (2016). Adults with one or more functional disabilities—United States, 2011–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 65(38), 1021–1025.
19.
StiegemeierD.KrausJ.BringelandS.BaumannM. (2023). Motivated to use: Beliefs and motivation influencing the acceptance and use of assistance and navigation systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2926–2941.
20.
ZahabiM.ZhengX.MarediaA.ShahiniF. (2022). Design of navigation applications for people with disabilities: A review of literature and guideline formulation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2942–2964.
