Development of an Interactive Assessment Tool for Universally-Designed Autonomous Vehicles

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to enable independent travel for people with disabilities, yet standardized tools for evaluating the accessibility, usability, and perceived safety of universally-designed, wheelchair-accessible AVs are lacking. This study discusses the development of an interactive assessment tool aimed at addressing this gap. The tool gathers both subjective perceptions and objective performance data across five sections: demographic information, pre-vehicle interaction survey, AV interaction tasks, post-interaction survey, and system usability ratings. By applying both qualitative and quantitative analyses, the tool provides a holistic view of user interactions with key vehicle components. Currently in the validation phase, this tool will soon be tested on real AVs, initially focusing on individuals with mobility impairments. This work seeks to contribute to inclusive AV design standards and provides a scalable method to support the development of more accessible transportation technologies for diverseuser populations.

Keywords

Transportation and Mobility Usability User Experience Disability/Accessibility Autonomous Vehicles Universal Design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angeleska

Lü

Pretto

(2024). Evaluation of an autonomous vehicle user interface for sensory impaired users. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 14(4), 570–589.

Bennett

Vijaygopal

Kottasz

(2019). Attitudes towards autonomous vehicles among people with physical disabilities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 127, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.002

Bert

Zare

Larique

Sagot

J. C.

(2024). Design and evaluation of a virtual reality application to enhance the acceptability of autonomous vehicles for disabled people. In Kolski

Mihăescu

M. C.

Rebedea

(Eds.), AI approaches for designing and evaluating interactive intelligent systems (pp. 69–84). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53957-2_4

Brinkley

Enam

(2024). The ATLAS autonomous vehicle HMI: leveraging sensory substitution to support the accessibility needs of blind and low vision users. In 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS59971.2024.10555850

Brooke

(1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.

CDC. (2024, December 13). Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults. Disability and Health. https://www.cdc.gov/disability-and-health/articles-documents/disabilities-health-care-access.html

Cordts

Cotten

S. R.

Bush

T. R.

(2021). Mobility challenges and perceptions of autonomous vehicles for individuals with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 14(4), 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101131

Dicianno

B. E.

Sivakanthan

Sundaram

S. A.

Satpute

Kulich

Powers

Deepak

Russell

Cooper

R. A.

(2021). Systematic review: Automated vehicles and services for people with disabilities. Neuroscience Letters, 761, 136103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136103

Enam

M. A.

Bastola

Brinkley

(2024). An inclusive model for external human machine interfaces of autonomous vehicles. In 2024 IEEE 4th international conference on human-machine systems (ICHMS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS59971.2024.10555718

10.

Hwang

Stough

L. M.

Lee

Turnbull

(2021). People with disabilities’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles as a viable transportation option to improve mobility: An exploratory study using mixed methods. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(12), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1833115

11.

Lättman

Olsson

L. E.

Friman

(2016). Development and test of the perceived accessibility scale (PAC) in public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 257–263.