The use of locking plate technology in foot and ankle surgery has increased over the last decade. Reported applications include fracture repair, deformity correction, and arthrodesis. There is limited evidence, however, to guide clinicians with regard to the appropriate and optimal use of this technology. This work aims to examine the current biomechanical and clinical evidence comparing locking construct technology to other forms of fixation in the field of foot and ankle surgery.
AbbasianAZaidiRGuhaA. Comparison of three different fixation methods of calcaneal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:420-425.
2.
AhmadJPourAERaikinSM. The modified use of a proximal humeral locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:977-983.
3.
AhmadMNandaRBajwaAS. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?Injury. 2007;38:358-364.
4.
BadekasAGeorgiannosDLampridisVBisbinasI. Proximal opening wedge metatarsal osteotomy for correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity using a locking plate. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1765-1770.
5.
BayleyEDuncanNTaylorA. The use of locking plates in complex midfoot fractures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:593-596.
BlakeMHOwenJRSanfordTSWayneJSAdelaarRS. Biomechanical evaluation of a locking and nonlocking reconstruction plate in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:432-436.
9.
BottlangM. Biomechanics of far cortical locking. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:e60.
10.
BottlangMDoorninkJByrdGDFitzpatrickDCMadeySM. A nonlocking end screw can decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:620-627.
11.
BottlangMDoorninkJFitzpatrickDCMadeySM. Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1985-1994.
12.
BoultonCLKimHShahSB. Do locking screws work in plates bent at holes? [published online August 14, 2013]. J Orthop Trauma.
13.
ChaconYFallatLMDauNBirC. Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the Akin osteotomy of the proximal phalanx. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:561-565.
14.
ChodosMDParksBGSchonLCGuytonGPCampbellJT. Blade plate compared with locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:219-224.
15.
CohenDAParksBGSchonLC. Screw fixation compared to H-locking plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:984-989.
16.
CottomJMRigbyRB. Biomechanical comparison of a locking plate with intraplate compression screw versus locking plate with plantar interfragmentary screw for Lapidus arthrodesis: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:339-342.
17.
CottomJMVoraAM. Fixation of lapidus arthrodesis with a plantar interfragmentary screw and medial locking plate: a report of 88 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:465-469.
18.
CronierPFrinJMSteigerVBigorreNTalhaA. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the tarsal navicular with locking plates: a report of 10 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:S241-S249.
19.
DavisATIsraelHCannadaLKBledsoeJG. A biomechanical comparison of one-third tubular plates versus periarticular plates for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:e201-e207.
20.
DaytonPPrinsDBSmithDEFeilmeierMJ. Effectiveness of a locking plate in preserving midcalcaneal length and positional outcome after Evans calcaneal osteotomy: a retrospective pilot study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):710-713.
21.
DeVriesJGGranataJDHyerCF. Fixation of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative cohort of two techniques. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:158-162.
22.
DiDomenicoLASannP. Posterior approach using anterior ankle arthrodesis locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:626-629.
23.
DiDomenicoLAWargo-DorseyM. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a femoral locking plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:128-132.
24.
DotyJCoughlinMHiroseCKempT. Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with a hybrid locking plate and a plantar neutralization screw: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(11):1535-1540.
25.
DrobetzHKutscha-LissbergE. Osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures with a volar locking screw plate system. Int Orthop. 2003;27:1-6.
26.
EckelTTGlissonRRAnandPParekhSG. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(11):1588-1595.
27.
EgolKAKubiakENFulkersonEKummerFJKovalKJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:488-493.
28.
EstesCRheePShraderMW. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:312-316.
29.
FreemanALTornettaPIIISchmidtA. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of “hybrid” plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:163-169.
30.
GallentineJWDeorioJKDeorioMJ. Bunion surgery using locking-plate fixation of proximal metatarsal chevron osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:361-368.
31.
GardnerMJGriffithMHDemetrakopoulosD. Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1962-1967.
GardnerRYousriTHolmesF. Stabilization of the syndesmosis in the Maisonneuve fracture—a biomechanical study comparing 2-hole locking plate and quadricortical screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:212-216.
34.
GarriguesGEGlissonRRGarriguesNWRichardMJRuchDS. Can locking screws allow smaller, low-profile plates to achieve comparable stability to larger, standard plates?J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:347-354.
35.
GautierESommerC. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34(suppl 2):B63-B76.
36.
GruberFSinkovVSBaeSYParksBGSchonLC. Crossed screws versus dorsomedial locking plate with compression screw for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:927-930.
37.
HaidukewychGJRicciW. Locked plating in orthopaedic trauma: a clinical update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:347-355.
38.
HuntKJBarrCRLindseyDPChouLB. Locked versus nonlocked plate fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:984-990.
39.
HuntKJEllingtonJKAndersonRB. Locked versus nonlocked plate fixation for hallux MTP arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:704-709.
40.
IllertTRammeltSDrewesTGrassRZwippH. Stability of locking and non-locking plates in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:307-313.
41.
KimTAyturkUMHaskellAMiclauTPuttlitzCM. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:2-6.
42.
KlosKGueorguievBMuckleyT. Stability of medial locking plate and compression screw versus two crossed screws for lapidus arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:158-163.
43.
KonanSMeswaniaJBlunnGWMadhavRTOddyMJ. Mechanical stability of a locked step-plate versus single compression screw fixation for medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:669-674.
44.
KregorPJ. Distal femur fractures with complex articular involvement: management by articular exposure and submuscular fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:153-175, ix.
45.
LyndeMJSautterTHamiltonGASchuberthJM. Complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18:103-107.
46.
MannJJMoonJLBroskyTAII. Low-profile titanium plate construct for early weightbearing with first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:460-464.
47.
MarlowWJSinghalRDheerendraS. Distal radius volar locking plates: does a variable angle locking system confer a clinical advantage?Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:309-316.
48.
McKennaPBO’SheaKBurkeT. Less is more: lag screw only fixation of lateral malleolar fractures. Int Orthop. 2007;31:497-502.
49.
MenkeCRMcGlamryMCCamastaCA. Lapidus arthrodesis with a single lag screw and a locking H-plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:377-382.
50.
MinihaneKPLeeCAhnCZhangLQMerkBR. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:562-566.
51.
O’NeillPJLogelKJParksBGSchonLC. Rigidity comparison of locking plate and intramedullary fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:581-586.
52.
OhlsonBLShatbyMWParksBGWhiteKLSchonLC. Periarticular locking plate vs intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011;40:78-83.
53.
ParkCHAhnJYKimYMLeeWC. Plate fixation for proximal chevron osteotomy has greater risk for hallux valgus recurrence than Kirschner wire fixation. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1085-1092.
54.
PatelBGustafsonPAJastiferJR. Stiffness of locking and conventional plates in fixation of distal fibula fractures: a finite element study. ASME proceedings: ASME 2010 International Mechanical engineering congress and exposition. 2010;Vol 2:449-464.
55.
PerrenSM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1093-1110.
56.
RauschSSchlonskiOKlosK. Volar versus dorsal latest-generation variable-angle locking plates for the fixation of AO type 23C 2.1 distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study in cadavers. Injury. 2013;44:523-526.
57.
RedfernDJOliveiraMLCampbellJTBelkoffSM. A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates for the fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:196-201.
58.
RicciWMLoftusTCoxCBorrelliJ. Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:190-196.
59.
RichterMGoslingTZechS. A comparison of plates with and without locking screws in a calcaneal fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:309-319.
60.
SaxenaANguyenANelsenE. Lapidus bunionectomy: early evaluation of crossed lag screws versus locking plate with plantar lag screw. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48:170-179.
61.
SaxenaASt LouisM. Medial locking plate versus screw fixation for fixation of the Ludloff osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52:153-157.
62.
SchutzMMullerMKrettekC. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study: results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury. 2001;32(suppl 3):SC48-SC54.
63.
ScrantonPECoetzeeJCCarreiraD. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsocuneiform joint: a comparative study of fixation methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:341-345.
64.
SikesJWJr.SmithBRMukherjeeDPCowardKA. Comparison of fixation strengths of locking head and conventional screws, in fracture and reconstruction models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:468-473.
65.
SommerCGautierEMullerMHelfetDLWagnerM. First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP). Injury. 2003;34(suppl 2):B43-B54.
66.
SpivakJMChenDKummerFJ. The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:334-338.
67.
StamatisEDChatzikomninosIEKaraoglanisGC. Mini locking plate as “medial buttress’’ for oblique osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:920-922.
StoffelKLorenzKUKusterMS. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:362-368.
70.
TaylorNGMetcalfeSA. Midfoot fusion using a locking plate system: a case report. Foot (Edinb). 2009;19:189-193.
71.
TornettaPIIICreevyW. Lag screw only fixation of the lateral malleolus. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:119-121.
72.
TsilikasSPStamatisEDKourkoulisSK. Mechanical comparison of two types of fixation for Ludloff oblique first metatarsal osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:699-702.
73.
WhiteNJCorrDTWaggJPLorinczCBuckleyRE. Locked plate fixation of the comminuted distal fibula: a biomechanical study. Can J Surg. 2013;56:35-40.
74.
ZehnderSBledsoeJGPuryearA. The effects of screw orientation in severely osteoporotic bone: a comparison with locked plating. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:589-594.
