Comparing the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale and the Auckland Individualism and Collectivism Scale in Two Cultures

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale (HVIC) and the Auckland Individualism and Collectivism Scale (AICS). The sample consisted of 1,403 working individuals from Switzerland (N = 585) and from South Africa (N = 818). Principal component factor analyses indicated that a two-factor structure replicated well across the two countries for both scales. In addition, the HVIC four-factor structure replicated well across countries, whereas the responsibility dimension of individualism of the AICS replicated poorly. Confirmatory factor analyses provided satisfactory support to the original theoretical models for both the HVIC and the AICS. Equivalence measurement indices indicated that the cross-cultural replicability properties of both instruments are generally acceptable. However, canonical correlations and correlations between the HVIC and AICS dimensions confirm that these two instruments differ in their underlying meaning of the individualism and collectivism constructs, suggesting that these two instruments assess individualism and collectivism differently.

Keywords

culture assessment Horizontal and Vertical Collectivism and Individualism Scale Auckland Individualism and Collectivism Scale cross-language replicability psychometric study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernardo

A. B. I.

(2010). Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 944-949. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.036

Ciochina

Faria

(2009). Individualism and collectivism: What differences between Portuguese and Romanian adolescents? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 555-564.

Hofstede

(1981). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 10(4), 15-41.

Hui

C. H.

(1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.

Kuppens

Realo

Diener

(2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 66-75. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.66

Lalwani

A. K.

Shavitt

Johnson

(2006). What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 165-178.

Aksoy

(2007). Dimensionality of individualism-collectivism and measurement equivalence of Triandis and Gelfand’s scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 313-329. doi:10.1007/s10869-006-9031-8

Okoro

Cardon

P. W.

Marshall

(2008). Horizontal and vertical individualist and collectivist tendencies among African American and European American management students. In Proceedings of the 2008 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention, USA (pp. 1-11).

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumption and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

10.

Paquet

S. L.

Kline

T. J. B.

(2009). Uncovering the psychometric properties of scales measuring individualist and collectivist orientations. International Journal of Testing, 9, 260-270. doi:10.1080/15305050903106859

11.

Shulruf

Alesi

Ciochina

Faria

Hattie

Hong

Watkins

(2011). Measuring collectivism and individualism in the third millennium. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39, 173-188. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.2.173

12.

Shulruf

Hattie

Dixon

(2007). Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 385-401. doi:10.1177/0734282906298992

13.

Singelis

T. M.

Triandis

H. C.

Bhawuk

D. P. S.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1995). Horizontal and vertical aspects of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275. doi:10.1177/106939719502900302

14.

Sivadas

Bruvold

N. T.

Nelson

M. R.

(2008). A reduced version of the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61, 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.016

15.

Soh

Leong

F. T. L.

(2002). Validity of the horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore: Relationships with values and interests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 3-15. doi:10.1177/0022022102033001001

16.

Steenkamp

J.-B. E. M.

Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.

17.

Triandis

H. C.

(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

18.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118

19.

Van Dyk

G. A. J.

Nefale

M. C.

(2005). The split-ego experience of Africans: Ubuntu therapy as a healing alternative. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 15, 48-66. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.15.1.48