Previous studies suggest a positive association between self-efficacy and subjective well-being. However, these investigations depend on the dichotomy between East Asian and Western cultures, often without directly examining the influence of cultural orientation. This raises questions: How do the psychological benefits of adolescent self-efficacy vary across countries, and to what extent does this variance relate to countries’ cultural orientations? To address these questions, the current study analyzed a sample of 15-year-old students across 66 countries (N = 427,584) drawn from the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data. As expected, we found that higher self-efficacy was related to better life satisfaction among adolescents in every country studied. Notably, the beneficial role of self-efficacy varies based on cultural context: The relationship between self-efficacy and adolescent life satisfaction is stronger in individualistic than collectivistic countries. These findings suggest that cultural environment is important for understanding adolescent social-psychological well-being and potentially offer broader implications for global mental health initiatives.
BanduraA.CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.GerbinoM.PastorelliC. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00567
4.
BogtT. T.de LoozeM.LeeA.van den EijndenR.StevensG.FungA. (2024). Social and economic indicators of psychological symptoms and life satisfaction among Dutch and Hong Kong adolescents: A cross-national HBSC study. Cross-Cultural Research, 0(0), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971241231019
5.
BurgerK.SamuelR. (2017). The role of perceived stress and self-efficacy in young people’s life satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0608-x
6.
CapraraG. V.StecaP.GerbinoM.PacielloiM.VecchioG. M. (2006). Looking for adolescents’ well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 15(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1121189x00002013
7.
ChenS. X.ChanW.BondM. H.StewartS. M. (2006). The effects of self-efficacy and relationship harmony on depression across cultures: Applying level-oriented and structure-oriented analyses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106292075
8.
CicognaniE. (2011). Coping strategies with minor stressors in adolescence: Relationships with social support, self‐efficacy, and psychological well‐being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00726.x
9.
CongerK. J.WilliamsS. T.LittleW. M.MasynK. E.ShebloskiB. (2009). Development of mastery during adolescence: The role of family problem-solving. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000107
10.
DienerEd. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541
11.
DienerEdSuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276
12.
DienerETayL.MyersD. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024402
13.
DupéréV.LeventhalT.VitaroF. (2012). Neighborhood processes, self-efficacy, and adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512442676
14.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J.KruglanskiA. W.Kim-PrietoC.DienerE.PierroA.HigginsE. T. (2010). On ‘Feeling Right’ in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384742
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
17.
GiblettA.HodginsG. (2023). Flourishing or languishing? The relationship between mental health, health locus of control and generalised self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211040432
18.
GundelachP.KreinerS. (2004). Happiness and life satisfaction in advanced European countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(4), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397104267483
HitlinS.EricksonL. D.BrownJ. S. (2015). Agency and mental health: A transition to adulthood paradox. Society and Mental Health, 5(3), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869315573632
21.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
HolahanC. K.HolahanC. J. (1987). Self-efficacy, social support, and depression in aging: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/42.1.65
24.
HonickeT.BroadbentJ. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
25.
KangS.-M.ShaverP. R.SueS.MinK.-H.JingH. (2003). Culture-specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1596–1608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203255986
26.
KayaS.EryilmazN.YukselD. (2024). A cross-cultural comparison of self-efficacy as a resilience measure: Evidence from PISA 2018. Youth & Society, 56(3), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X231186833
27.
KimMi J.ParkJ. H. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and life satisfaction among adolescents: Mediating effects of self-transcendence. Child & Youth Services, 41(4), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2020.1852920
28.
KlassenR. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000330
29.
Kööts-AusmeesL.RealoA. (2016). Life satisfaction among ethnic minorities in Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(3), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116628671
30.
KrysK.ParkJ.Kocimska-ZychA.KosiarczykA.SelimH. A.Wojtczuk-TurekA.HaasB. W.UchidaY.TorresC.CapaldiC. A.BondM. H.ZelenskiJ. M.LunV. M. C.MaricchioloF.VauclairC. M.Poláčková ŠolcováI.SirlopúD.XingC.VignolesV. L.AdamovicM. (2020). Personal life satisfaction as a measure of societal happiness is an individualistic presumption: Evidence from fifty countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2197–2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00311-y
31.
MaZ.-W.ZengW.-N.YeK.-Y. (2015). Gender differences in Chinese adolescents’ subjective well-being: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.07.PR0.116k15w2
32.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224
33.
MinkovM.DuttP.SchachnerM.MoralesO.SanchezC. J.JandosovaJ.KhassenbekovY.MuddB. (2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0197
34.
MinkovM.KaasaA. (2022). Do dimensions of culture exist objectively? A validation of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture with World Values survey items and scores for 102 countries. Journal of International Management, 28(4), Article 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100971
35.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (1998). Education, personal control, lifestyle and health: A human capital hypothesis. Research on Aging, 20(4), 415–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027598204003
36.
MornarM.MarušićI.ŠabićJ. (2022). Academic Self-efficacy and learning strategies as mediators of the relation between personality and elementary school students’ achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(4), 1237–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00576-8
37.
MurisP. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00027-7
38.
NarisadaA.SchiemanS. (2016). ‘A quintessentially American thing?’: The unexpected link between individualistic values and the sense of personal control. Society and Mental Health, 6(3), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869316667448
39.
O'ConnorD. B.ShimizuM. (2002). Sense of personal control, stress and coping style: A cross‐cultural study. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 18(4), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.939
OlivierE.ArchambaultI.De ClercqM.GalandB. (2019). Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0
42.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
43.
PearlinL. I.MenaghanE. G.LiebermanM. A.MullanJ. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136676
44.
RossC. E.BrohB. A. (2000). The roles of self-esteem and the sense of personal control in the academic achievement process. Sociology of Education, 73(4), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673234
45.
RossC. E.MirowskyJ. (2013). The sense of personal control: Social structural causes and emotional consequences. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJo C.BiermanA. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 379–402). Springer.
46.
RossC. E.Van WilligenM. V. (1997). Education and the subjective quality of life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955371
47.
SastryJ.RossC. E. (1998). Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787064
48.
SmithP. B.AhmadA. H.OweE.CelikkolG. C.PingHGavreliucA.ChobthamkitP.RizwanM.ChenS. X.TehH. B.VignolesV. L. (2016). Nation-level moderators of the extent to which self-efficacy and relationship harmony predict students’ depression and life satisfaction: Evidence from 10 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(6), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116648210
49.
SuhE. M.DienerE. D.UpdegraffJ. A. (2008). From culture to priming conditions: Self-construal influences on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107311769
50.
SuhE. M.OishiS. (2002). Subjective well-being across cultures. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1076
51.
TripathiR. C.LeviatanU. (2003). Individualism and collectivism: In search of a product or process?Culture & Psychology, 9(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x03009001005
52.
WrightM. O. ’D.MastenA. S.NarayanA. J. (2013). Resilience processes in development: Four waves of research on positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In GoldsteinS.BrooksR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 15–37). Springer US.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
