A measure of time attitudes, Culture of Time Inventory—33 items (COTI-33), was developed and validated in English and Russian on 560 American and 517 Russian respondents. The study aim was to examine and assess culturally relevant time attitudes that may affect performances on timed psychological and neuropsychological tests. A stable and comparable five-factor model emerged across samples, revealing the following dimensions of time attitudes: (1) planning; (2) punctuality; (3) time management; (4) event-time orientation; and (5) time-limited tests. Cultural differences emerged in COTI-33 factor scores where Americans rated planning and punctuality significantly higher than Russians. Discriminant validity of the scale was examined against the Big Five Personality Inventory. COTI-33 was established to have high reliability and construct validity and may serve as a valuable instrument for assessing the influence of time attitudes on timed psychological test performances in both clinical and non-clinical settings.
AgranovichA. V.PanterA. T.PuenteA. E.TouradjiP. (2011). The culture of time in neuropsychological assessment: Exploring the effects of culture-specific time attitudes on timed test performance in Russian and American samples. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(4), 692–701.
2.
AgranovichA. V.PuenteA. E. (2007). Do Russian and American normal adults perform similarly on neuropsychological tests? Preliminary findings on the relationship between culture and test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 273–282.
BirthK. K. (2004). Finding time: Studying the concepts of time used in daily life. Field Methods, 16(1), 70–84.
5.
BlockR. A.BuggieS. E.MatsuiF. (1996). Beliefs about time: Cross-cultural comparisons. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 130(1), 5–22.
6.
BlockR. A.SaggauJ. L.NickolL. H. (1983–84). Temporal inventory on meaning and experience: A structure of time. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 3(3), 203–225.
7.
BorodowskyG. H.AndersonB. B. (2000). A cross-cultural study of consumer attitudes toward time. Journal of Global Marketing, 13(3), 93–109.
8.
BrislinR. W.KimE. S. (2003). Cultural diversity in people’s understanding and uses of time. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(3), 363–382.
9.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE.
10.
CamaraW. J.NathanJ. S.PuenteA. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(2), 141–154.
11.
CotteJ.RatneshwarR.MickD. G. (2004). The times of their lives: Phenomenological and metaphorical characteristics of consumer lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 333–345.
12.
DonatiM. A.BoncompagniJ.ScabiaA.MorsanyiK.PrimiC. (2019). Using the Adolescent Time Inventory—Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) to assess time attitudes in Italian adolescents and young adults: Psychometric properties and validity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 424–435.
13.
Francis-SmytheJ.RobertsonI. (1999). Time-related individual differences. Time & Science, 8(2), 273–292.
14.
FulmerC. A.CrosbyB.GelfandM. J. (2014). Cross-cultural perspectives on time. In ShippA. J.FriedY. (Eds.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology. Time and work, Vol. 2. How time impacts groups, organizations and methodological choices (pp. 53–75). Psychology Press.
15.
GretsovA. G. (1995). Russian version of the “Big Five’ personality traits adapted from Costa and McCrae’s model [«Bolshaia piaterka» lichnostnikh kachestv na osnovanii modeli lichnosti Kosti i Mac-Kreia]. [«Большая пятерка» личностных качеств не основании модели личности Косты и Мак-Крея] http://agretsov.narod.ru/Big5.doc (Rus.).
16.
HallE. (1959). The silent language. NY: Doubleday.
17.
HillO. W.BlockR. A.BuggieS. E. (2000). Culture and beliefs about time: Comparisons among Black Americans, Black Africans, and White Americans. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 134(4), 443–461.
18.
HomskayaE. D. (1999). Reading-book on neuropsychology [Khrestomatia po neiropsikhologii]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow State University Press.
19.
HuL. T.BentlerP. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). SAGE.
20.
HuiC. H.TriandisH. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152.
21.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory: Technical report. University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
22.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
23.
KnyazevG. G.KuznetsovaV. B.SavostyanoA. N.DoroshevaE. A. (2017). Does collectivism act as a protective factor for depression in Russia?Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 26–31.
24.
KoG.GentryJ. W. (1991). The development of time orientation measure for use in cross-cultural research. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 135–142.
25.
LevineR. (1997). A geography of time. Basic Books.
26.
LevineR.NorenzayanA. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(2), 178–205.
27.
MacCallumR. C.WidamanK. F.PreacherK. J.HongS. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611–637.
ManraiL. A.LascuD. N.ManraiA. K.BabbH. W. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of style in Eastern European emerging markets. International Marketing Review, 18(3), 280–285.
30.
ManraiL. A.ManraiA. K. (1995). Effects of cultural-context, gender and acculturation on perception of work versus social/leisure time usage. Journal of Business Research, 32, 115–128.
31.
MikadzeY. V. (2011). Methodology of neuropsychological assessment: Qualitative (metasyndromal analysis of cognitive deficit structure) and quantitative (psychometric estimate) aspects. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 1(4), 261–267.
32.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Author.
33.
NellV. (2000). Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: Theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
NunnallyJ.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
35.
OsborneJ. W.CostelloA. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9, Article 11.
36.
PalmerD.SchoormanF. (1999). Unpacking the multiple aspects of time in polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4), 323–345.
37.
Perez-ArceP.PuenteA. E. (1997). Neuropsychological assessment of ethnic minorities. The case of assessing Hispanics living in North America. In ShordoneR. J.LongC. J. (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests (pp. 283–300). St. Lucie Press.
38.
PetersonR. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391.
39.
PuenteA. E.AgranovichA. V. (2003). The cultural in cross-cultural neuropsychology. In HersenM.GoldsteinG.BeersS. R. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 1: Intellectual and neuropsychological assessment (pp. 321–332). Wiley & Sons.
40.
Rojas-MendezJ. I.DaviesG.OmerO.ChetthamrongchaiP.MadranC. (2002). A time attitude scale for cross-cultural research. Journal of Global Marketing, 15(3–4), 117–147.
41.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
SircovaA. (2005). Psychological time: Approbation of Zimbardo’s test of temporal perspective [psychologicheskoe vremya: aprobatsija metodiki Zimbardo po vremennoi perspective]. Vestnik of Moscow State Univerisity, Series14, 1.
43.
SircovaA.MitinaO. V.BoydJ.DavydovaI.ZimbardoP.FieulaineN.NepryahoT. L.NikitinaE. A.SemyonovaN. S.YasnayaV. A. (2007). The phenomenon of time perspective across different cultures: Review of researches using ZTPI Scale. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19–31.
44.
TongrenN.HechtL.KovachK. (2001). Recognizing cultural differences: Key to successful U.S.—Russian enterprises. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), 1–17.
45.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
46.
TriandisH. C.VassiliouV.VassiliouG.TanakaY.ShanmugamA. V. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. Wiley.
47.
VassermanL. I.DorofeevaS. A.MeyersonY. A. (1997). Methods of neuropsychological diagnostics: Practical manual. Stoipechat (Russian).
48.
WangM.RiegerM. O.HensT. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52(C), 115–135.
49.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
