This study aims to explore the associations among relationship quality, cognitive flexibility, cognitive emotion regulation, and subjective well-being in married individuals in Turkey. Using a cross-sectional correlational design, we collected data from 1,013 married participants (mean age = 40.65; 52.5% male). Results indicated that relationship quality was positively associated with subjective well-being, cognitive flexibility, and adaptive emotion regulation strategies and negatively associated with maladaptive emotion-regulation strategies. Cognitive flexibility and adaptive emotion-regulation strategies were positively associated with subjective well-being, whereas maladaptive strategies were negatively associated. Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect associations between relationship quality and subjective well-being through cognitive flexibility and both adaptive and maladaptive emotion-regulation strategies. These findings highlight patterns of association among relational and cognitive-emotional variables in marital well-being and may inform future research and clinical practice.
AcikgozF.KaracaA. (2025). The effect of a mindfulness-based cognitive therapy program on depression, anxiety, stress, and cognitive flexibility in nursing students: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Professional Nursing, 56, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.12.005
2.
Akçay-ÖzcanD.Kıran-EsenB. (2016). Investigation of the relationship between cognitive flexibility and selfefficacy of adolescents. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 7(24), 1–10.
3.
Alonso-DebreczeniF.BaileyP. E. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective age and the association with cognition, subjective well-being, and depression. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa069
4.
AltınözA. E.KöşgerF.EşsizoğluA. (2019). Relationship between selective attention, cognitive flexibility, response inhibition and theory of mind functions in OCD. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 20(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.301548
5.
Aydoğan AvşarP.ÇalişkanD.Türkegün ŞengülM. (2026). The relationship between maternal alexithymia and cognitive flexibility, children's emotional eating, and childhood obesity. Appetite, 216, 108258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108258
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
7.
BentlerP. M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
8.
BowenM. (1978). In Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
9.
BresinR. C.MurdockN. L.MarszalekJ. M.StapleyL. A. (2017). The triangular relationship inventory: Development and validation. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 6(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000094
10.
ÇağlarN. C.BozkurB. (2025). How maternal gatekeeping relates to parenting stress: A serial mediation model via self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 91, Article 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-025-01630-1
11.
CalatravaM.MartinsM. V.Schweer-CollinsM.Duch-CeballosC.Rodríguez-GonzálezM. (2022). Differentiation of self: A scoping review of Bowen family systems theory's core construct. Clinical Psychology Review, 91, 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102101
12.
ÇaparA.ÇuhadarD. (2025). The effect of cognitive behavior approach-based psychoeducation on cognitive emotion regulation strategies and levels of negative emotional symptoms of emerging adults with earthquake experience: Randomized controlled trial. Current Psychology, 44(12), 11472–11485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07986-7
13.
CarrA. (2020). Evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of systemic family therapy. In WamplerK. S.MillerR. B.SeedallR. B. (Eds.), The handbook of systemic family therapy: Systemic family therapy with couples (Vol. 3, pp. 119–146). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119438519.ch6
14.
ChenM. S.CaiQ.OmariD.SanghviD. E.LyuS.BonannoG. A. (2025). Emotion regulation and mental health across cultures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. National Human Behavior, 9(6), 1176–1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02168-8
15.
Chen-BouckL.PattersonM. M.PengA. (2024). Relations of coping strategies and cognitive emotion regulation to Chinese children's academic achievement goals and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1454886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454886
16.
ComptonW. C.HoffmanE. (2013). Positive psychology: The Science of happiness and flourishing (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Merrill Prentice Hall.
18.
DarlingtonR. B.HayesA. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts, applications, and implementation.The Guilford Press.
19.
DasK. V.Jones-HarrellC.FanY.RamaswamiA.OrloveB.BotchweyN. (2020). Understanding subjective well-being: Perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Reviews, 41(25), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5
DaviesR. M.KnollM. A.KyranidesM. N. (2024). A moderated mediation analysis on the influence of social support and cognitive flexibility in predicting mental wellbeing in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70(1), 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102560
22.
DavisonA. C.HinkleyD. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press.
23.
Deits-LebehnC.SmithT. W.BaucomB. R. W.Nealey-MooreJ. B.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2019). Two-dimension assessment of marital functioning across adulthood: The quality of relationships inventory. Journal of Family Issues, 41(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19881670
24.
DennisJ. P.Vander-WalJ. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
25.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
26.
DienerE.HeintzelmanS. J.KushlevK.TayL.WirtzD.LutesL. D.OishiS. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 58(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063
27.
DienerE.LucasR. E.OishiS. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
DienerE.PressmanS. D.HunterJ.Delgadillo-ChaseD. (2017). If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090
30.
Domic-SiedeM.Guzmán-GonzálezM.Sánchez-CorzoA.ÁlvarezX.ArayaV.EspinozaC.ZenisK.Marín-MedinaJ. (2024). Emotion regulation unveiled through the categorical lens of attachment. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01748-z
31.
ErusS. M.DenizM. E. (2020). The mediating role of emotional intelligence and marital adjustment in the relationship between mindfulness in marriage and subjective well-being. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 317–354. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.011
FeeneyB. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.268
34.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
35.
FeeneyJ.FitzgeraldJ. (2019). Attachment, conflict and relationship quality: Laboratory-based and clinical insights. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.002
36.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.
37.
FordM.WangY. R.HuhY. (2018). Work, the work-family interface, and subjective well-being. In DienerE.OishiS.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (pp. 438–456). DEF Publishers. https://doi.org/nobascholar.com
38.
FrenchK. A.DumaniS.AllenT. D.ShockleyK. M. (2018). A meta-analysis of work family conflict and social support. Psychological Bulletin, 144(3), 284–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000120
39.
FreyB. B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement and evaluation. Sage Publications.
40.
GarnefskiN.KraaijV. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
41.
GarnefskiN.KraaijV.SpinhovenP. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
42.
GarnefskiN.KraaijV.SpinhovenP. (2002). Manual for the use of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) (pp. 1–47). DATEC.
43.
GençözT. (2000). Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15(46), 19–28.
44.
González-DíazR. R.Acevedo-DuqueÁ.Salazar-SepúlvedaG.CastilloD. (2021). Contributions of subjective well-being and good living to the contemporary development of the notion of sustainable human development. Sustainability, 13(6), 3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063298
45.
Gonzalez-MendezR.Rojas-SolísJ. L.Ramírez-SantanaG. (2018). Exploring conflict resolution and psychological abuse across romantic relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1327912
46.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
47.
GüleçS.BilginM. (2024). Satisfaction model in romantic relationships: Basic psychological needs, mindfulness, relationship quality, attribution styles. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 14(75), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1422284
48.
Gülümİ. V. Dağİ. (2012). The Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the repetitive thinking questionnaire and the cognitive flexibility inventory. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 13(3), 216–223.
49.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
50.
HansfordM.JobsonL. (2021). Associations between relationship quality, social network resources, appraisals, coping, and Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(5), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001015
51.
HohlK.DolcosS. (2024). Measuring cognitive flexibility: A brief review of neuropsychological, self-report, and neuroscientific approaches. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1331960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1331960
52.
HudsonN. W.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2019). The highs and lows of love: Romantic relationship quality moderates whether spending time with one’s partner predicts gains or losses in well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(4), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219867960
53.
IşıkE.ÖzbilerŞ.Schweer-CollinsM. L.Rodríguez-GonzálezM. (2020). Differentiation of self predicts life satisfaction through marital adjustment. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 48(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1732248
54.
JebbA. T.MorrisonM.TayL.DienerE. (2020). Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychological Science, 31(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898826
55.
KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (2017). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
56.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
57.
KocaD.EkşiH. (2021). Self-Efficacy and well-being of science high school students: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(3), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.803179
58.
KoestenJ.SchrodtP.FordD. J. (2009). Cognitive flexibility as a mediator of family communication environments and young adults’ well-being. Health Communication, 24(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802607024
59.
KurtA.BilgeY. (2025). Relationship between cognitive flexibility and psychological symptoms: The serial mediating role of automatic thoughts and uncertainty intolerance. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 14(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.14744/JCBPR.2024.39376
60.
KushlevK.DrummondD. M.DienerE. (2019). Subjective well-being and health behaviors in 2.5 million Americans. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12178
61.
LazarusR. S. (2007). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. In MonatA.LazarusR. S.ReevyG. (Eds.), The Praeger handbook on stress and coping (pp. 33–51). Praeger Publishers/ Greenwood Publishing Group.
62.
LiJ.YaoM.LiuH. (2021). From social support to adolescents’ subjective well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and prosocial behavior and gender difference. Child Indicators Research, 14(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09755-3
63.
MardiaK. V.FosterK. (1983). Omnibus tests of multinormality based on skewness and kurtosis. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 12(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928308828452
64.
MarroquínB. (2011). Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(8), 1276–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.005
65.
McLeodS.BerryK.HodgsonC.WeardenA. (2020). Attachment and social support in romantic dyads: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 59–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22868
66.
Morales-AlmeidaP.Alemán-RamosP. F. (2025). Cognitive flexibility and its relationship with subjective well-being: The mediating role of emotional regulation in young adults. Journal of Psychological Research, 34(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251329860
67.
MorawetzC.HemetsbergerF. J.LairdA. R.KohnN. (2025). Emotion regulation: From neural circuits to a transdiagnostic perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 168(4), 105960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105960
68.
MorrisA.CrissM. M.SilkJ. S.HoultbergB. J. (2017). The impact of parenting on emotion regulation during childhood and adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12238
69.
Nakhostin-KhayyatM.BorjaliM.ZeinaliM.FardiD.MontazeriA. (2024). The relationship between self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and resilience among students: A structural equation modeling. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 337. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01843-1
70.
NizriH.CatzO.Siman-TovY.FarchiM.Levy-GigiE. (2025). Cognitive flexibility as a mechanism of change: The relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and stress reactions before and after psychological first-aid training. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 49(6), 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-025-10605-1
71.
OdacıH.KınıkÖKayaF. (2025). The mediating role of self-esteem in the correlation between perceived parenting style and subjective well-being of young adults in university. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2024.2429418
72.
OkurS.ÜmmetD.SatıcıS. A.KütükH. (2025). Relations among family communication, cognitive flexibility, and happiness in Turkish adults: A longitudinal mediation model. Current Psychology, 44(3), 1467–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07224-6
73.
OnatO.OtrarM. (2010). Adaptation of cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire to Turkish: Validity and reliability studies. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 31(31), 123–143.
74.
ÖntaşE.SezerB.OkyayP. (2024). Fundamentals of online data collection: A practical guide for methods and approaches. Journal of Continuing Medical Education, 32(5), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.1430097
75.
ÖzabacıN. (2011). The Turkish adaptation of the relationship quality scale: A validity and reliability study. Education and Science, 36(162), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.15390/ES.2011.985
76.
PierceG. R.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one?Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 61(6), 1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.1028
77.
PierceG. R.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.Solky-ButzelJ. A.NagleL. C. (1997). Assessing the quality of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597143004
78.
PlateA. J.AldaoA. (2017). Emotion regulation in cognitive-behavioral therapy: Bridging the gap between treatment studies and laboratory experiments. In HofmannS. G.AsmundsonG. J. G. (Eds.), The science of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 107–127). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803457-6.00005-2
79.
RodriguezL. M.LeeK. D. M.OnufrakJ.DellJ. B.QuistM.DrakeH. P.BryanJ. (2020). Effects of a brief interpersonal conflict cognitive reappraisal intervention on improvements in access to emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms in college students. Psychology & Health, 35(10), 1207–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1711090
80.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
81.
SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.PierceG. R. (1990). Social support: The search for theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.133
82.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
83.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2015). Using Multivariate Statistics(M. Baloğlu, Trans.) (6th ed.). Nobel Publishing Distribution.
87.
TaşdemirS. H.MuratM. (2021). Role of cognitive emotion regulatory strategies in the relationship between cognitive flexibility and resilience levels of prospective teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 22(3), 2188–2209. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1005419
88.
TongK.FuX.HooN. P.MunL. K.VassiliuC.LangleyC.SahakianB. J.LeongV. (2024). The development of cognitive flexibility and its implications for mental health disorders. Psychological Medicine, 54(14), 3203–3209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001508
89.
TosunC.YazıcıH. (2021). Perceived parental relationship behaviors, dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships and relationship quality among college students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2021.8.1.223
90.
TrentiniE.Dan-GlauserE. (2024). Which emotion regulation strategy is efficient for whom? Reappraisal and suppression efficiency for adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles. Journal of Personality, 93(2), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12948
91.
TuranN.HülyaK. E.GülG. B. A. (2025). Emotions, coping and psychological flexibility in earthquake survivors: A cross-sectional study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 30(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540
Tuzgöl DostM.ArasS. (2021). Close relationship belief and self-change as predictors of romantic relationship quality in university students. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 11(1), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.004
94.
WangH.XuC.FanX. (2018). Effect of marital relationship on women’s quality of life: Testing the mediating role of subjective well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22123
95.
WangT.LiM.XuS.LiuB.WuT.LuF.XieJ.PiengL.WangJ. (2019). Relations between trait anxiety and depression: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Affective Disorders, 244, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.074
96.
WatsonD.ClarkL.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personalitv and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
97.
WhismanM. A.JohnsonD. P.LiA.RobustelliB. L. (2014). Intimate relationship involvement, intimate relationship quality, and psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000026
98.
YazarM. S.Şenyaşar-MeterelliyozK. Ş. (2019). Examination of relationship between depressive symptoms, cognitive flexibility and hopelessness in non-clinic population. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 8(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.5455/JCBPR.24354
99.
Yazıcı ÇelebiG.GüngörS.KayaF. (2025). The role of cognitive flexibility and psychological well-being in the effect of mindfulness on problematic internet use. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 31373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16858-w
100.
YetimÜ. (1993). Life satisfaction: A study based on the organization of personal projects. Social Indicators Research, 29(3), 227–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079516
101.
Yıldırım CinekB.Pekyürek VaranM.YaprakG.AltıntaşM. (2025). Cognitive emotion regulation and its impact on sexual function, body image, and depression in breast cancer survivors. Psychiatry Investigation, 22(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0349
102.
YılmazH. (2019). The influence of relationship quality and forgiveness on happiness. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 8(Special Issue 1), 1189–1120. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.478153
103.
YoderW.Du BoisS. N. (2020). Marital satisfaction is associated with health in long-distance relationships. The Family Journal, 28(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720911609
104.
YurtE.HayliÇ. M. (2025). Mediating role of self-efficacy and cognitive flexibility in the relationship between critical thinking and positive mental health in Turkish nursing students: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 15(8), e097631. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097631
