Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-8
Parent Autonomy Support and Psychological Control,Dark Triad,and Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Adolescents: Synergy of Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches
In the current study, variable- and person-centered approaches were simultaneously adopted to investigate the relations among perceived parental autonomy support and psychological control, the Dark Triad traits, and subjective well-being (SWB) among Chinese adolescents (N = 1,533). Results showed that autonomy support from parents primarily contributed to narcissism, whereas psychological control predicted all the Dark Triad traits, which in turn had reversed effects on adolescents’ SWB. In particular, narcissism had more prominent effects on SWB and important mediating effects in the relation between parent autonomy support and psychological control and SWB. Four distinct Dark Triad traits groups were identified, and the characteristics of these groups suggested that Machiavellianism was more strongly related to psychopathy relative to narcissism; moreover, the four groups demonstrated different links with parental autonomy support and psychological control and SWB, further supporting the results noted above. Implications for theory and practice are included.
AghababaeiN.BłachnioA. (2015). Well-being and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 365-368. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.043
2.
BradburnN. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
3.
BranjeS. J. T.van LieshoutC. F. M.van AkenM. A. G. (2004). Relations between Big Five personality characteristics and perceived support in adolescents’ families. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 615-628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.615
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BolenK.LongJ. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
ChenB.ShiZ.SunS. (2017). Life history strategy as a mediator between childhood environmental unpredictability and adulthood personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 215-219. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.032
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
7.
ChenW.ZhangJ. (2004). Factorial and construct validity of the Chinese positive and negative affect scale for student. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 18, 763-765.
8.
CheungC. S.PomerantzE. M. (2011). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning in the United States and China: Implications for children’s academic and emotional adjustment. Child Development, 82, 932-950. doi:1467-8624.2011.01582.x
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
10.
CostaS.CuzzocreaF.GugliandoloM. C.LarcanR. (2016). Associations between parental psychological control and autonomy support, and psychological outcomes in adolescents: The mediating role of need satisfaction and need frustration. Child Indicators Research, 9, 1059-1076. doi:10.1007/s12187-015-9353-z
11.
CramerP. (2011). Young adult narcissism: A 20 year longitudinal study of the contribution of parenting styles, preschool precursors of narcissism, and denial. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 19-28. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.004
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 37-41. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104
13.
DeclercqF.MarkeyS.VandistK.VerhaegheP. (2009). The youth psychopathic trait inventory: Factor structure and antisocial behaviour in non-referred 12–17-year-olds. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 577-594. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239724
14.
DemirM.ÖzdemirM.MarumK. P. (2011). Perceived autonomy support, friendship maintenance, and happiness. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 145, 537-571. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.607866
15.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
16.
DunkelC. S.MathesE.HarbkeC. (2011). Life history strategy, identity consolidation, and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 34-38. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.005
17.
DunkelC. S.MathesE. W.KesselringS. N.DeckerM. L.KeltsD. J. (2015). Parenting influence on the development of life history strategy. Evolution & Human Behavior, 36, 374-378. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.006
18.
EganV.ChanS.ShorterG. W. (2014). The Dark Triad, happiness and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 17-22. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.004
19.
EganV.HughesN.PalmerE. J. (2015). Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 123-128. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.054
20.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R.SefcekJ. A.TalI. R.. . . JacobsW. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243-275. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002
21.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 199-216. doi:10.1111/spc3.12018
22.
GarciaD.MacDonaldS. (2017). Dark personality profiles: Estimating the cluster structure of the Dark Triad. PsyCh Journal, 6, 239-224. doi:10.1002/pchj.175
23.
GeelM.GoemansA.ToprakF.VedderP. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Difference, 106, 231-235. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063
24.
GrolnickW. S.PomerantzE. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 165-170. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00099.x
25.
HartW.RichardsonK.BreedenC. J. (2019). An interactive model of narcissism, self-esteem, and provocation extent on. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 112-118. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.032
26.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/1070551990954011
27.
HuebnerE. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149-158. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.149
28.
HurstJ. E.KavanaghP. S. (2017). Life history strategies and psychopathology: The faster the life strategies, the more symptoms of psychopathology. Evolution & Human Behavior, 38(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.06.001
29.
JonasonP. K.BaughmanH. M.CarterG. L.ParkerP. (2015). Dorian Gray without his portrait: Psychological, social, and physical health costs associated with the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 5-13. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.008
30.
JonasonP. K.KrauseL. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 532-537. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
31.
JonasonP. K.LyonsM.BethellE. (2014). The making of Darth Vader: Parent–child care and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 30-34. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.006
32.
JonasonP. K.LyonsM.BethellE. J.RossR. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 572-576. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009
33.
JonasonP. K.TomeJ. (2019). How happiness expectations relate to the Dark Triad traits. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 371-382. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1529652
34.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521-526. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
35.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D.SchmittD. P.LiN. P.CryselL. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: Life history theory and the dark triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 16, 192-199. doi:10.1037/a0027914
36.
JonasonP. K.WeeS.LiN. P. (2015). Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the Dark Triad predict job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 112-116. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.026
37.
JonasonP. K.WeeS.LiN. P.JacksonC. (2014). Occupational niches and the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 119-123. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.024
38.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28-41. doi:10.1177/1073191113514105
39.
KleinA.MoosbruggerH. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
40.
KongF.ZhaoJ.YouX. (2012). Self-esteem as mediator and moderator of the relationship between social support and subjective well-being among Chinese university students. Social Indicators Research, 112, 151-161. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0044-6
41.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M. (2007). Why identities fluctuate: Variability in traits as a function of situational variations in autonomy support. Journal of Personality, 75, 1205-1228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00473.x
42.
LauK. S. L.MarseeM. A. (2013). Exploring narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism in youth: Examination of associations with antisocial behavior and aggression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 355-367. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9586-0
43.
LekesN.GingrasI.PhilippeF. L.KoestnerR.FangJ. (2010). Parental autonomy-support, intrinsic life goals, and well-being among adolescents in China and North America. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 858-869. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9451-7
44.
LitalienD.MorinA. J. S.McInerneyD. M. (2017). Generalizability of achievement goal profiles across five cultural groups: More similarities than differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 267-283. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.008
45.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
46.
LittleT. D.JorgensenT. D.LangK. M.MooreE. W. G. (2013). On the joys of missing data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 151-162. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jst048
47.
LiuJ.BartholomewK.ChungP. K. (2017). Perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal styles and well-being and ill-being in secondary school physical education students: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. School Mental Health, 9, 360-371. doi:10.1007/s12310-017-9223-6
48.
LoveA. B.HolderM. D. (2016). Can romantic relationship quality mediate the relation between psychopathy and subjective bell-being?Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2407-2429. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9700-2
49.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
50.
MaslowskyJ.JagerJ.HemkenD. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 87-96. doi:10.1177/0165025414552301
51.
MurisP.MeestersC.TimmermansA. (2013). Some youths have a gloomy side: Correlates of the dark triad personality traits in non-clinical adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 44, 658-665. doi:10.1007/s10578-013-0359-9
52.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 183-204. doi:10.1177/1745691616666070
53.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
54.
NgH. K. S.CheungR. Y. H.TamK. P. (2014). Unraveling the link between narcissism and psychological health: New evidence from coping flexibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 7-10. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.006
55.
OlderbakS. G.FigueredoA. J. (2010). Life history strategy as a longitudinal predictor of relationship satisfaction and dissolution. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 234-239. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.041
56.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
57.
PeughJ. L.EndersC. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556. doi:10.3102/00346543074004525
58.
RatelleC. F.SimardK.GuayF. (2013). University students’ subjective well-being: The role of autonomy support from parents, friends, and the romantic partner. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 893-910. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9360-4
59.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 449-479). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
60.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In WenzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171-195). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9780203879498
61.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
62.
SardeshmukhS. R.VandenbergR. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 20, 721-745. doi:10.1177/1094428115621609
63.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1-10. doi:10.1037/a0018082
64.
ShekD. T. L. (2007). A longitudinal study of perceived parental psychological control and psychological well-being in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 1-22. doi:10.1002/jclp.20331
65.
ShenY. (2011). Effects of Chinese parental practices on adolescent school outcomes mediated by conformity to parents, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 282-290. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.09.001
66.
SpechtJ.LuhmannB. M.GeiserC. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 540-556. doi:10.1037/a0036863
67.
TianL.LiuW. (2005). Test of the Chinese version of multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19, 301-303.
68.
Van PetegemS.BrenningK.BaudatS.BeyersW.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2018). Intimacy development in late adolescence: Longitudinal associations with perceived parental autonomy support and adolescents’ self-worth. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 111-122. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.008
69.
VansteenkisteM.RyanR. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263-280. doi:10.1037/a0032359
70.
VernonP. A.VillaniV. C.VickersL. C.HarrisJ. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 445-452. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
71.
VeselkaL.SchermerJ. A.MartinR. A.VernonP. A. (2010). Relations between humor styles and the Dark Triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 772-774. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.017
72.
VizeC. E.LynamD. R.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D. (2016). Differences among Dark Triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 101-111. doi:10.1037/per0000222
73.
VolmerJ.KochI. K.GöritzA. S. (2016). The bright and dark sides of leaders’ dark triad traits: Effects on subordinates’ career success and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 413-418. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.027
74.
WangQ.PomerantzE. M.ChenH. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592-1610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x
75.
YuS.ChenB.Levesque-BristolC.VansteenkisteM. (2016). Chinese education examined via the lens of self-determination. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 177-214. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9395-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
