In the present study, we examined the relationship between marital satisfaction and cultural value orientations (e.g., collectivism–individualism), self-disclosure, and conflict tactics (e.g., exit and loyalty) among Singaporean couples. A total of 160 individuals (80 husbands and 80 wives) participated in this study. The results indicated that self-disclosure and exit conflict tactics were strong predictors of couples’ marital satisfaction. Collectivism which has a significant association with loyalty conflict tactics impacts husbands’ satisfaction. In contrast, neither collectivism nor individualism was related to wives’ satisfaction. Implications for future study and clinical practice were discussed.
AvruchK. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
2.
BellL.BellD. (2000). Japanese and U.S. marriage experiences: Traditional and nontraditional perceptions of family. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 309–319.
3.
BradfordS.FeeneyJ.CampbellL. (2002). Links between attachment orientations and dispositional and diary-based measures of disclosure in dating couples: A study of actor and partner effects. Personal Relationships, 9, 491–506.
4.
BradburyT.FinchamF. (1987). Affect and cognition in close relationships: Toward an integrative model. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 59–67.
5.
BradburyT.FinchamF. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713–721.
6.
BresnahanM.OhashiR.LiuW.NebashiR.LiaoC. (1999). A comparison of response styles in Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Culture Psychology, 30, 342–358.
7.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
8.
CheoR.QuahE. (2005). Mothers, maids and tutors: An empirical evaluation of their effect on children’s academic grades in Singapore. Education Economics, 13, 269–285.
9.
ChewI.LiaoZ. (1999). Family structures on income and career satisfaction of managers in Singapore. Journal of Management Development, 18, 464–476.
10.
CordovaJ. V.GeeC. B.WarrenL. Z. (2005). Emotional skillfulness in marriage: Intimacy as a mediator of the relationship between emotional skillfulness and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 24, 218–235.
11.
DerlegaV.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
ElfenbeinH.FooM.BoldryJ.TanH. (2006). Dyadic effects in nonverbal communication: A variance partitioning analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 149–159.
13.
EpsteinN.BaucomD. (2008). Enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
FinkelE.RusbultC.KumashiroM.HannonP. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 956–974.
15.
FitzpatrickJ.FengD.LiangS. (2006). Cultural context of spousal communication in China and USA. Invited Symposium Paper presented at the International Association for Relationship Research Conference, Rethymnon, Greece.
16.
FitzpatrickJ.LiangS.FengD.CrawfordD.SorellG.Morgan-FlemingB. (2006). Social values and self-disclosure: A comparison of Chinese native, Chinese resident (in U.S.) and North American spouses. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37, 113–127.
17.
FletcherG.FitnessJ. (1990). Concurrent social cognition in the close relationship interaction: The role of proximal and distal variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 464–474.
18.
FooK.MerrickP.KazantzisN. (2006). Counseling/psychotherapy with Chinese Singaporean clients. Asian Journal of Counseling, 13, 271–293.
19.
FrisbieS.FitzpatrickJ.FengD.CrawfordD. (2000). Women’s personality traits, interpersonal competence and affection for dating partners. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 28, 585–594.
20.
GainesS.ReisH.SummersS.RusbultC.CoxC.WexlerM…KurlandG. (1997). Impact of attachment style on reactions to accommodating dilemmas in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 93–113.
21.
GilliardJ.BlantonP.BartleyS. (2007). Gender and generation: The relative influence of intimacy and individuation with mother and with father for spousal intimacy and individuation among dual-earner husbands and wives. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15, 350–358.
22.
GohM. (2005). Cultural competence and master therapists: An inextricable relationship. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 71–81.
23.
GohmC.OishiS.DarlingtonJ.DienerE. (1998). Culture, parental conflict, parental marital status, and the subjective well-being of young adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 319–334.
24.
GoodwinR.PlazaS. (2000). Perceived and received social support in two cultures: Collectivism and support among British and Spanish students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 282–291.
25.
GottmanJ. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail . . . and how you can make yours last. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
26.
GottmanJ. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York, NY: Norton.
27.
GreenE. (2008). Individuals in conflict: An internal family systems approach. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 16, 125–131.
28.
GudykanstW.GaoG.SchmidtK.NishidaT.BondM.WangG.BarracloughR. (1992). The influence of individualism-collectivism, self-monitoring and predicted-outcome value on communication in in-group and outgroup relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 196–213.
29.
HanzalA.SegrinC. (2009). The role of conflict resolution styles in mediating the relationship between enduring vulnerabilities and marital quality. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 150–169.
30.
HockerJ.WilmotW. (1995). Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
31.
HoneycuttJ.WoodsB.FontenotK. (1993). The endorsement of communication conflict rules as a function of engagement, marriage, and marital ideology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 285–304.
32.
HwangW.ChunC.KurasakiK.MakW.TakeuchiD. (2000). Factor validity of scores on a social support and conflict measure among Chinese Americans. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 808–816.
33.
JandtE. F.PedersenB. P. (1996). Constructive conflict management Asia-Pacific cases. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
JourardS.LasakowP. (1958). Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 91–98.
35.
KamoY. (1990). Husbands and wives living in nuclear and stem family households in Japan. Sociological Perspectives, 33, 397–417.
36.
KilpatrickS.BissonnetteV.RusbultC. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behaviors among newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 9, 369–393.
37.
KitoM. (2005). Self-disclosure in romantic relationships and friendships among American and Japanese college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 127–140.
38.
KurdekL. (1991). Correlates of relationship satisfaction in cohabiting gay and lesbian couples: Integration of contextual, investment, and problem-solving models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 910–922.
39.
La TailladeJ. J. (2006). Considerations for treatment of African American couple relationships. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 341–358.
40.
LazarM. (2001). For the good of the nation: ‘Strategic egalitarianism’ in the Singapore context. Nations and Nationalism, 7, 59–74.
41.
LeeW. (2002). One therapist, four cultures: Working with families in Greater China. Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 258–275.
42.
MaJ. (2000). Treatment expectations and treatment experience of Chinese families towards family therapy. The Association for Family Therapy and Systemic Practice, 22, 296–307.
43.
MadathilJ.BenshoffJ. (2008). Importance of marital characteristics and marital satisfaction: A comparison of Asian Indians in arranged marriages and Americans in marriages of choice. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 16, 222–230.
44.
MarkmanH.RhoadesG.ScottS.RaganE.WhittonS. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 910–922.
45.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotions, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
46.
MeunierV.BakerW. (2012). Positive couple relationships: The evidence for long-lasting relationship satisfaction and happiness. In RoffeyS. (Ed.), Positive relationships: Evidence-based practice across the world (pp. 73–89). New York, NY: Springer.
OrgillJ.HeatonT. B. (2005). Women’s status and marital satisfaction in Bolivia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 23–40.
49.
OsarugueO. (2008). Communication: A vital strategy for managing marital problems. Journal of Counseling, 1, 114–126.
50.
OverallN.SibleyC. (2010). Convergent and discriminant validity of the accommodation scale: Evidence from three diary studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 299–304.
51.
OwR.KatzD. (1999). Family secrets and the disclosure of distressful information in Chinese families. Families in Society, 80, 620–628.
52.
PilgirmC.Rueda-RiedleA. (2002). The importance of social context in cross-cultural comparisons: First graders in Colombia and the United States. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 283–295.
53.
PimentalE. (2000). Just how do I love thee? Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 32–47.
54.
QuekK. (2009). “We” consciousness: Creating equality in collectivist culture. In Knudson-MartinC. & Mahoney (Eds.), Couples, gender and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 193–214). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
QuekK.Knudson-MartinC. (2006). A push toward equality: Processes among dual-career newlywed couples in a collectivistic culture. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 56–69.
56.
QuekK.Knudson-MartinC. (2008). Reshaping marital power: How dual-career newlywed couples create equality in Singapore. Journal of Social and Interpersonal Relations, 25, 513–534.
57.
QuekK.StormC. (2012). Chinese values in supervisory discourse: Implications for culturally sensitive practices. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34, 44–56.
58.
RosenfeldL.BowenG. (1991). Marital disclosure and marital satisfaction: Direct-effect vs. indirect-effect models. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 69–84.
59.
RusbultC.JohnsonD.MorrowG. (1986). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving on distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 744–753.
60.
SchummW.Paff-BergenL.HatchF.ObiorahJ.CopelandJ.MeensL.BugaighisM. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.
61.
SchwartzS. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–63). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
62.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KagiscibasiC.ChoiS. C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
SegrinC.HanzalA.DomschkeT. (2009). Accuracy and bias in newlywed couples’ perceptions of conflict styles and the association with marital satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 76, 207–233.
64.
SetoA.CavallaroM. (2007). Cross-national couples in the Mainland United States. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15, 258–264.
65.
ShekY. L. (2006). Asian American masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 14, 379–391.
SowanW.GoodwinR. (2009). Experiencing marital satisfaction across three cultures: A qualitative study. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 26, 1011–1028.
68.
SriramN. N. (2002). The role of gender, ethnicity, and age in intergroup behavior in a naturalistic setting. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 251.
69.
SteilJ. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
SueD.SueD. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley.
71.
SullivanC.CottoneR. (2006). Culturally based couple therapy and intercultural relationships. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 14, 221–224.
72.
TeoP.GrahamE.YeohB.LevyS. (2003). Values, change and inter-generational ties between two generations of women in Singapore. Ageing & Society23, 327–347.
73.
ThorntonA.Young-DeMarcoL. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage & Family, 63, 1009.
74.
Ting-ToomeyS.ChungL. C. (2005). Understanding intercultural communication. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
75.
TriandisH. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
76.
WaringE.ChamberlaineC.CarverC.StalkerC.SchaeferB. (1995). A pilot study of marital therapy as a treatment for depression. American Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 3–10.
77.
YarhouseM.NowackiS. (2007). The many meanings of marriage: Divergent perspectives seeking common ground. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 16, 222–230.
78.
YennT. Y. (2007). Inequality for the greater good: Gendered state rule in Singapore. Critical Asian Studies, 39, 423–445.
