The current study examined the association between both partners’ perceptions of the other partner's use of influence tactics during conflicts (harsh vs. soft) and both partners’ relationship satisfaction. Using a dyadic approach, the mediating role of support transactions (i.e., given and received support) was also examined. One-hundred and thirteen couples filled out questionnaires regarding partners’ use of influence tactics, received and given support, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated one partner effect; namely, women's received support was found to be a mediator between women's perception of their partners’ use of harsh tactics and both partners’ satisfaction. There was only one actor mediation effect of given support and that was observed among women alone; namely, given support mediated the association between harsh tactics and women's relationship satisfaction. Gender and support transaction may play an important role in explaining the link between harsh tactics and relationship satisfaction.
AidaY.FalboT. (1991). Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles, 24(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702.
2.
AielloA.TesiA.PrattoF.PierroA. (2018). Social dominance and interpersonal power: Asymmetrical relationships within hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating work environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12488.
3.
BartonA. W.LavnerJ. A.StanleyS. M.JohnsonM. D.RhoadesG. K. (2020). Will you complete this survey too?” differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000583.
4.
BerliC.SchwaningerP.ScholzU. (2021). “We feel good”: Daily support provision, health behavior, and well-being in romantic couples. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.622492.
5.
BuiK. V. T.RavenB. H.SchwarzwaldJ. (1994). Influence strategies in dating relationship: The effects of relationship satisfaction, gender, and perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(3), 429–442.
6.
CouttsJ. J.HayesA. F.JiangT. (2019). Easy statistical mediation analysis with distinguishable dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 69(6), 612–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz034.
7.
CramerD. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and conflict style in romantic relationships. The Journal of Psychology, 134(3), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009600873.
8.
CramerD. (2006). How a supportive partner may increase relationship satisfaction. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880500483141.
9.
CropanzanoR.AnthonyE. L.DanielsS. R.HallA. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099.
10.
CutronaC. (1996). Social support in couples. Sage.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222.
FinchamF. D.RoggeR.BeachS. R. H. (2018). Relationship satisfaction. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 422–436). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.033
15.
FowersB. J.OlsonD. H. (1989). ENRICH Marital inventory: A discriminant validity and cross-validation assessment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1989.tb00777.x.
16.
George-LeviS.VilchinskyN.RafaeliE.LibermanG.KhaskiaaA.MosseriM.HodH. (2017). Caregiving styles and anxiety among couples: Coping versus not coping with cardiac illness. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1206530.
17.
GordonA. M.ChenS. (2016). Do you get where I’m coming from?: Perceived understanding buffers against the negative impact of conflict on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000039.
HagedoornM.DaganM.PutermanE.HoffC.MeijerinkW. J.DeLongisA.SandermanR. (2011). Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: The interplay of past and current spousal support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34(4), 288–297. 10.1007/s10865-010-9311-7
20.
HilpertP.BodenmannG.NussbeckF. W.BradburyT. M. (2013). Predicting relationship satisfaction in distressed and non-distressed couples based on a stratified sample: A matter of conflict, positivity, or support?Family Science, 4(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2013.830633
21.
Holt-LunstadJ.BirminghamW.JonesB. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9018-y.
22.
Jensen, J. F., Rauer, A. J., & Volling, B. (2013). A dyadic view of support in marriage: The critical role of men’s support provision. Sex roles, 68(7), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0256-x
23.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635.
24.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (2014). The design and analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 589–607). Cambridge University Press.
25.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
KeshetS.KarkR.Pomerantz-ZorinL.KoslowskyM.SchwarzwaldJ. (2006). Gender, status and the use of power strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.287.
27.
KipnisD.SchmidtS. M. (1985). The language of persuasion. Psychology Today, 4(1), 40–46.
28.
KoslowskyM.SchwarzwaldJ. (2001). The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. In Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 195–214). Psychology Press.
KörnerR.SchützA. (2021). Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced power are associated with relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(9), 2653–2677, https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211017670.
31.
KroemekeA.KubickaE. (2018). Positive and negative adjustment in couples undergoing infertility treatment: The impact of support exchange. PloS one, 13(6), e0200124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200124.
32.
Laslo-RothR.SchwarzwaldJ. (2016). Rationale and emotion in the selection of influence tactic by managers in conflict with subordinates. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2014-0076
33.
LedermannT.MachoS.KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.
34.
LorenzoJ. M.BarryR. A.KhalifianC. E. (2018). More or less: Newlyweds’ preferred and received social support, affect, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(7), 860–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000440.
35.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
36.
McLeodS.BerryK.HodgsonC.WeardenA. (2020). Attachment and social support in romantic dyads: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 59–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22868.
37.
NakoneznyP. A.DentonW. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701647264.
38.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383045.
39.
Peleg-KoriatI.Weimann-SaksD.Ben-AriR. (2018). The relationship between power perception and couple's Conflict management strategy. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 17(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2017.1399847.
40.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010.
41.
RavenB. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In SteinerD.FishbeinM. (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371–382). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
42.
RavenB. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244.
Sánchez-FuentesM. D. M.Santos-IglesiasP. (2016). Sexual satisfaction in spanish heterosexual couples: Testing the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of sex & Marital Therapy, 42(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1010675.
45.
SchwarzerR.KnollN. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396641.
46.
SchwarzwaldJ.KoslowskyM.BernsteinJ. (2013). Power tactic usage by gender at work and home: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-03-2011-0020.
47.
SchwarzwaldJ.KoslowskyM.Izhak-NirE. B. (2008). Gender role ideology as a moderator of the relationship between social power tactics and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 59(9), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9454-y.
48.
SczesnyS.NaterC.EaglyA. H. (2019). Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology. Current issues in social psychology (pp. 103–116). Routledge.
49.
StaffordL. (2017). Social exchange theory: A cost-benefit approach to relationships. In Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 279–289). Routledge.
50.
TashakTashakkoriA.JohnsonR. B.TeddlieC. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
51.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). Oxford University Press.
52.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592.
53.
ÜnalÖAkgünS. (2020). Conflict resolution styles as predictors of marital adjustment and marital satisfaction: An actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1766542.
54.
VerhofstadtL. L.BuysseA.IckesW.De ClercqA.PeeneO. J. (2005). Conflict and support interactions in marriage: An analysis of couples’ interactive behavior and on-line cognition. Personal Relationships, 12(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00100.x.
55.
WhismanM. A.GilmourA. L.SalingerJ. M. (2018). Marital satisfaction and mortality in the United States adult population. Health Psychology, 37(11), 1041–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000677.
56.
WhittonS. W.James-KangalN.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2018). Understanding couple conflict. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 297–310). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.024.
57.
WindleM.WindleR. C. (2019). Partner conflict and support as moderators of alcohol use on alcohol problems and marital satisfaction in young adult marital dyads. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(4), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13977.
58.
ZvonkovicA. M.SchmiegeC. J.HallL. D. (1994). Influence strategies used when couples make work-family decisions and their importance for marital satisfaction. Family Relations, 43(2), 182–188. 10.2307/585321
