Do selection methods for public officials impact how they represent their constituents? Municipal clerks in the New England states offer an ideal case to examine this question. As key government actors in full-service local governments with minimal overlapping jurisdictions, clerks in these states vary in how they are selected—either through election or appointment. Using an original online and mail survey of municipal clerks across five New England states, we find that elected clerks demonstrate a stronger orientation toward public service and are more responsive to constituent concerns. However, selection methods show little impact on substantive ideological, partisan, or policy representation. These findings highlight the relationship between the mode of selection and representation, offering a foundation for future research on other offices and dimensions of representation.
AdrianCharles R.1952. “Some General Characteristics of Nonpartisan Elections.” American Political Science Review46 (3): 766–776.
4.
AdrianCharles R.1959. “A Typology for Nonpartisan Elections.” The Western Political Quarterly12 (2): 449–458.
5.
AltJamesMesquitaEthan Bueno deRoseShanna. 2011. “Disentangling Accountability and Competence in Elections: Evidence from U.S. Term Limits.” The Journal of Politics73 (1): 171–186.
6.
AnziaSarah F.2011. “Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 412–427. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000028.
Barboza-WilkesCynthia J.LeThai V.ReshWilliam G.. 2023. “Deconstructing Burnout at the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Generation in Local Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory33 (1): 186–201.
9.
BerryChristopher. 2008. “Piling On: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal Common-Pool.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 802–820.
BowmanJohn H.MikesellJohn L.. 1989. “Elected Versus Appointed Assessors and the Achievement of Assessment Uniformity.” National Tax Journal42 (2): 181–189.
12.
BucchianeriPeter. 2020. “Party Competition and Coalitional Stability: Evidence from American Local Government.” American Political Science Review114 (4): 1055–1070.
13.
BurdenBarry C.2004. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science34 (2): 211–227.
14.
BurdenBarry C.CanonDavid T.LavertuStephaneMayerKenneth R.MoynihanDonald P.. 2013. “Selection Method, Partisanship, and the Administration of Elections.” American Politics Research41 (6): 903–936.
15.
ButlerDaniel M.CrabtreeCharles. 2021. “Audit Studies in Political Science.” In Advances in Experimental Political Science, edited by DruckmanJames N.GreenDonald P., 42–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Canes-WroneBrandiceDe MarchiScott. 2002. “Presidential Approval and Legislative Success.” The Journal of Politics64 (2): 491–509.
17.
CarrJered B.2015. “What Have We Learned About the Performance of Council-Manager Government? A Review and Synthesis of the Research.” Public Administration Review75 (5): 673–689.
18.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018. “Off-Cycle and Out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 119–132. doi:10.1086/694396
19.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustinWarshawChristopher. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–1138.
20.
de TocquevilleAlexis. 2000. Democracy in America. University Of Chicago Press.
21.
EggersAndrew C.GarroHaritzGrimmerJustin. 2021. “No Evidence for Systematic Voter Fraud: A Guide to Statistical Claims About the 2020 Election.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (45): e2103619118.
22.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid M.LuskKatharine. 2014. Mayoral Policy Making: Results from the 21st Century Mayors Leadership Survey. Technical Report. Boston University Initiative on Cities.
23.
FerrerJoshua. ND. “Do Local Election Officials Represent Their Constituents?” Working Paper.
24.
FerrerJoshua. 2025. “To Elect or Appoint?: Evidence from Local Election Administration.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science20 (3): 369–408.
25.
FerrerJoshuaGeynIgorThompsonDaniel M.. 2024. “How Partisan is Local Election Administration?” American Political Science Review118 (2): 956–971.
26.
FouirnaiesAlexanderHallAndrew B.. 2022. “How Do Electoral Incentives Affect Legislator Behavior? Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review116 (2): 662–676.
27.
GailmardSeanJenkinsJeffery A.. 2009. “Agency Problems, the 17th Amendment, and Representation in the Senate.” American Journal of Political Science53 (2): 324–342.
28.
GarmannSebastian. 2015. “Elected or Appointed? How the Nomination Scheme of the City Manager Influences the Effects of Government Fragmentation.” Journal of Urban Economics86: 26–42.
29.
GordonSanford C.HuberGregory. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science2 (2): 107–138.
30.
GrumbachJacob M.2022. Laboratories Against Democracy. Princeton University Press.
31.
GrumbachJacob M.2023. “Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding.” American Political Science Review117 (3): 967–984.
32.
HallAndrew B.2015. “What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries?” American Political Science Review109 (1): 18–42.
33.
HansenBen B.Olsen KlopferStephanie. 2006. “Optimal Full Matching and Related Designs Via Network Flows.” Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics15 (3): 609–627.
34.
HessamiZohal. 2018. “Accountability and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials.” The Review of Economics and Statistics100 (1): 51–64.
35.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15 (3): 199–236.
36.
HooverGary A.2008. “Elected Versus Appointed School District Officials: Is There a Difference in Student Outcomes?” Public Finance Review36 (5): 635–647.
HuberGregory A.GordonSanford C.. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When it Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 247–263.
39.
JewittCaitlin E.GorenPaul. 2016. “Ideological Structure and Consistency in the Age of Polarization.” American Politics Research44 (1): 81–105.
40.
JonesPhilip Edward. 2013. “The Effect of Political Competition on Democratic Accountability.” Political Behavior35: 481–515.
41.
LineberryRobert L.FowlerEdmund P.. 1967. “Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities.” American Political Science Review61 (3): 701–716.
42.
MatsusakaJohn G.2015. “Responsiveness’ as a Measure of Representation.” University of Southern California Law School Legal Studies Working Paper Series.
43.
MunroWilliam Bennett. 1934. Municipal Administration. The MacMillan Company.
44.
OliverJ. EricHaShang E.CallenZachary. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton University Press.
45.
PartridgeMarkSassTim R.. 2011. “The Productivity of Elected and Appointed Officials: The Case of School Superintendents.” Public Choice149: 133–149.
46.
PetrovskyNicolaiXinGeYuJinhai. 2023. “Job Satisfaction and Citizen Satisfaction with Street-level Bureaucrats: Is There a Satisfaction Mirror?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory33 (2): 279–295.
SahnAlexander. 2023. “Reform Reconsidered: The Effects of Form of Government.” Journal of Historical Political Economy3 (3): 337–362.
49.
SancesMichael W.2016. “The Distributional Impact of Greater Responsiveness: Evidence from New York Towns.” The Journal of Politics78 (1): 105–119. doi:10.1086/683026.
50.
SancesMichael W.2017. “Attribution Errors in Federalist Systems: When Voters Punish the President for Local Tax Increases.” The Journal of Politics79 (4): 1286–1301.
51.
SancesMichael W.2019. “How Unusual Was 2016? Flipping Counties, Flipping Voters, and the Education–Party Correlation Since 1952.” Perspectives on Politics17 (3): 666–678.
52.
TausanovitchChrisWarshawChristopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review108 (3): 605–641.
53.
ThomsenDanielle M.KingAaron S.. 2020. “Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power.” American Political Science Review114 (4): 989–1000.
54.
TitiunikRocio. 2016. “Drawing Your Senator from a Jar: Term Length and Legislative Behavior.” Political Science Research and Methods4 (2): 293–316.
55.
WarshawChristopherRoddenJonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?” The Journal of Politics74 (1): 203–219.
56.
WhalleyAlexander. 2013. “Elected Versus Appointed Policy Makers: Evidence from City Treasurers.” The Journal of Law and Economics56 (1): 39–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
