One goal of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) is to broaden representation in largely White-controlled city councils state-wide by incentivizing cities to shift council electoral jurisdictions from at-large to single-member districts. However, little research has investigated whether the CVRA helped contribute to increased minority representation at the city level. This article employs matching and difference-in-difference methods to determine whether cities that switched to district elections as a result of the CVRA enhanced city council diversification. By comparing matched treatment and control group’s racial composition of city councils before and after fully switching from at-large to district election jurisdictions, we estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of city switching on minority city council representation at 10% to 12%. Further analysis reveals treatment effects are larger among cities with larger shares of Latinos (21%). Thus, states seeking to increase local-level minority representation should consider policies similar to those found in the CVRA.
AboschYishaiyaBarretoMatt A.Woods.Nathan D.2007. “An Assessment of Racially Polarized Voting for and Against Latino Candidates in California.” In Voting Right Act Reauthorization of 2006: Perspectives on Democracy, Participation, and Power, edited by HendersonAna, 107–31. Oakland: Univ. of California Regents School.
BarretoMatt A.2010. Ethnic Cues: The Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Political Participation. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
4.
BarretoMatt A.CollingwoodLorenGarcia-RiosSergioOskooiiKassra A. R.2019. “Estimating Candidate Support in Voting Rights Act Cases: Comparing Iterative EI and EI-RxC methods.” Sociological Methods & Research. Published electronically July2. doi:10.1177/0049124119852394.
5.
BarretoMatt A.SeguraGaryWoodsNathan D.2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review98 (1): 65–75.
6.
BerryBarbara L.DyeThomas R.1979. “The Discriminatory Effects of At-Large Elections.” Florida State University Law Review7 (1): 85–122.
7.
BishinBenjamin G.KaufmannKaren M.StevensDaniel. 2012. “Turf Wars: Local Context and Latino Political Development.” Urban Affairs Review48 (1): 111–37.
8.
BledsoeTimothy. 1986. “A Research Note on the Impact of District/At-Large Elections on Black Political Efficacy.” Urban Affairs Quarterly22 (1): 166–74.
9.
BrownNadia. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
10.
BrownNadiaBanksKira H.2014. “Black Women’s Agenda Setting in the Maryland State Legislature.” Journal of African American Studies18 (2): 164–80.
11.
BullockCharles S.MacManusSusan A.1993. “Testing Assumptions of the Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test: An Analysis of the Impact of Structures on Black Descriptive Representation.” American Politics Quarterly21 (3): 290–306.
12.
CollingwoodLorenBarretoMatt A.Garcia-RiosSergio I.2014. “Revisiting Latino Voting: Cross-Racial Mobilization in the 2012 Election.” Political Research Quarterly67 (3): 632–45.
13.
CollingwoodLorenO’BrienBenjamin GonzalezTafoyaJoe R.2019. “Partisan Learning or Racial Learning: Opinion Change on Sanctuary City Policy Preferences in CA and TX.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics2018:1–38.
14.
CollingwoodLorenOskooiiKassraGarcia-RiosSergioBarretoMatt A.2016. “eicompare: Comparing Ecological Inference Estimates Across EI and EI:RxC.” The R Journal8 (2): 92–101.
15.
DavidsonChandlerGrofmanBernard. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
16.
DavidsonChandlerKorbelGeorge. 1981. “At-Large Elections and Minority-Group Representation: A Re-examination of Historical and Contemporary Evidence.” The Journal of Politics43 (4): 982–1005.
17.
DonaldStephen G.LangKevin. 2007. “Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data.” The Review of Economics and Statistics89 (2): 221–33
18.
GayClaudine. 2001. “The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 589–602.
19.
GayClaudine. 2010. “Race and Turnout: Does Descriptive Representation in State Legislatures Increase Minority Voting?” Political Research Quarterly63 (4): 890–907.
20.
GrofmanBernardHandleyLisaLublinDavid. 2000. “Drawing Effective Minority Districts: A Conceptual Framework and Some Empirical Evidence.” North Carolina Law Review79 (5): 1383–1430.
21.
GrofmanBernardHandleyLisaNiemiRichard G.1992. Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
HendersonJohn A.2018. “Hookworm Eradication as a Natural Experiment for Schooling and Voting in the American South.” Political Behavior40 (2): 467–94.
23.
HeroRodney. 2013. Black-Latino Relations in US National Politics: Beyond Conflict or Cooperation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
24.
HoDaniel E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis15 (3): 199–236.
25.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference Without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
26.
ImbensGuido W.WooldridgeJeffrey M.2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature47 (1): 5–86.
27.
KaufmannKaren M.2004. The Urban Voter: Group Conflict and Mayoral Voting Behavior in American Cities. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
28.
KaufmannKaren M.RodriguezAntonio. 2011. “Political Behavior in the Context of Racial Diversity: The Case for Studying Local Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics44 (1): 101–102.
29.
KousserJ. Morgan. 1999. Colorblind Injustices. Chapel Hill: The Univ. of North Carolina Press.
30.
KousserJ. Morgan. 2008. “Has California Gone Colorblind?” In The New Political Geography of California, edited by DouzetFrederickKousserThadMillerKenneth P., 267–90. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies.
31.
LeeYueh-TingOttatiVictorHussainImtiaz. 2001. “Attitudes toward “Illegal” Immigration into the United States: California Proposition 187.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences23 (4): 430–43.
32.
LublinDavid. 1999a. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
33.
LublinDavid. 1999b. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review93 (1): 183–86.
34.
LublinDavidHandleyLisaBrunellThomas L.GrofmanBernard. 2019. “Minority Success in Non-majority Minority Districts: Finding the ‘Sweet Spot.’” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics2019:1–24.
35.
LublinDavidVossD. Stephen. 2000. “Racial Redistricting and Realignment in Southern State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 792–810.
36.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘yes.’.” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–57.
37.
MorganStephen L.WinshipChristopher. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38.
NewmanBenjamin J.2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 374–90.
39.
NewmanBenjamin J.ShahSonoCollingwoodLoren. 2018. “Race, Place, and Building a Base: Latino Population Growth and the Nascent Trump Campaign for President.” Public Opinion Quarterly82 (1): 122–34.
40.
ObermeyerZiadMakarMaggieAbujaberSamerDominiciFrancescaBlockSusanCutlerDavid M.2014. “Association Between the Medicare Hospice Benefit and Health Care Utilization and Costs for Patients with Poor-Prognosis Cancer.” Journal of the American Medical Association312 (18): 1888–96.
TrebbiFrancescoAghionPhilippeAlesinaAlberto. 2008. “Electoral Rules and Minority Representation in US Cities.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics123 (1): 325–57.
43.
TrounstineJessicaValdiniMelody E.2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member Versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science52 (3): 554–69.
44.
WelchSusan. 1990. “The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.” The Journal of Politics52 (4): 1050–76.
45.
WingCoadySimonKosaliBello-GomezRicardo A.2018. “Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.” Annual Review of Public Health39:453–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
