Disproportionate rates of congressional representation based on gender and race are especially stark considering the symbolic and substantive meaning derived from descriptive representation (Mansbridge 1999). Using an original data set consisting of candidate demographics, district characteristics, and campaign finance reports, we analyze an understudied barrier to representation: unequal access to campaign receipts. We argue that it is the simultaneous gendering and racialization of the campaign finance system that produces gaps in campaign fundraising and representation (Crenshaw 1989). Our results underscore the limitations of unitary approaches which conclude that women no longer face a disadvantage in campaign fundraising. Unequal access to campaign receipts serve as a barrier to the descriptive representation of women of color. By analyzing the interaction of both race and gender on campaign receipt totals in U.S. House elections from 2010 to 2018, we assert the path to representation is not equal for all.
AlbrightLaura. 2014. “Not Simply Black and White: The Relationship between Race/Ethnicity and Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections.” APSA Annual Meeting. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2475889.
2.
AbramowitzAlan I.1988. “Explaining Senate Election Outcomes.”The American Political Science Review82 (2): 385–403.
3.
ArceneauxKevin. 2001. “The ‘Gender Gap’ in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 143–60.
4.
BerkmanMichaelEisensteinJames. 1999. “State Legislators as Congressional Candidates:The Effects of Prior Experience on Legislative Recruitment and Fundraising.” Political Research Quarterly52 (3): 481–98.
5.
BondRobert M.FarissChristopher J.JonesJason J.KramerAdam D. I.MarlowCameronSettleJaime E.FowlerJames H.2012. “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature489 (7415): 295–98.
6.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.DarmofalDavidFarrellChristian A.2009. “The Aggregate Dynamics of Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics71 (1): 309–23.
7.
BrantonReginaEnglishAshleyPetteySamanthaBarnesTiffany D.2018. “The Impact of Gender and Quality Opposition on the Relative Assessment of Candidate Competency.” Electoral Studies54:35–43.
BullockCharles S.GaddieRonald KeithFerringtonAnders. 2002. “System Structure, Campaign Stimuli, and Voter Falloff in Runoff Primaries.” The Journal of Politics64 (4): 1210–24.
10.
BurrellBarbara. 2014. Gender in Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
CareyTony E.LizotteMary-Kate. 2019. “Political Experience and the Intersection between Race and Gender.” Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (2): 243–66.
12.
CarrollSusan J.FoxRichard, eds. 2018. Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics. 4th ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CrenshawKimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” The University of Chicago Legal Forum140:139–67.
18.
CrespinMichael H.DeitzJanna L.2010. “If You Can’t Join ’Em, Beat ’Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly63 (3): 581–93.
19.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyCoopermanRosalyn. 2018. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics80 (4): 1211–24.
DoviSuzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?”The American Political Science Review96 (4): 729–43.
24.
FergusonThomasJorgensenPaulChenJie. 2016. “How Money Drives US Congressional Elections.” Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 48. Rochester. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2817705.
25.
FoxRichard L.LJennifer. Lawless, and Courtney Feeley. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (3): 411–35.
26.
FragaBernard L.2018. The Turnout Gap: Race, Ethnicitity, and Political Inequality in a Diversifying America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FragaBernard L.HassellHans J. G.2020. “Are Minority and Women Candidates Penalized by Party Politics? Race, Gender, and Access to Party Support.” Political Research Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1065912920913326.
28.
FranciaPeter. 2001. “Early Fundraising by Nonincumbent Female Congressional Candidates: The Importance of Women’s PACs.”Women & Politics23 (1–2): 7–20.
29.
FranciaPeterGreenJohn C.HerrnsonPaul S.PowellLynda W.WilcoxClyde. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
GreenDonald P.KrasnoJonathan S.1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.”American Journal of Political Science32 (4): 884–907.
33.
GreenJoanne Connor. 1998. “The Role of Gender in Open-Seat Elections for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Women & Politics19 (2): 33–55.
34.
GreenJoanne Connor. 2003. “The Times . . . Are They A-Changing? An Examination of the Impact of the Value of Campaign Resources for Women and Men Candidates for the US House of Representatives.” Women & Politics25 (4): 1–29.
35.
GrossmanMattHopkinsDavid. 2016. Assymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interested Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
GrumbachJacob M.SahnAlexander. 2020. “Race and Representation in Campaign Finance.” American Political Science Review114 (1): 206–21.
37.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.2008. “Mobilizing Interest: The Effects of Money on Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science52 (3): 457–70.
HassellHans J. G.VisalvanichNeil. 2019. “The Party’s Primary Preferences: Race, Gender, and Party Support of Congressional Primary Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science63 (4): 905–19.
40.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” The American Political Science Review97 (4): 529–50.
41.
HerrickRebekah. 1996. “Is There a Gender Gap in the Value of Campaign Resources?”American Politics Quarterly24 (1): 68–80.
42.
HoganRobert E.2007. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections.” Social Science Quarterly88 (5): 1092–1105.
43.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–47.
JacobsonGary C.1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.”American Journal of Political Science34 (2): 334–62.
47.
JacobsonGary C.2006. “Campaign Spending Effects in US Senate Elections: Evidence from the National Annenberg Election Survey.”Electoral Studies25 (2): 195–226.
48.
JacobsonGary C.2015. “How Do Campaigns Matter?”Annual Review of Political Science18 (1): 31–47.
49.
JenkinsShannon. 2007. “A Woman’s Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 230–39.
50.
JohnsonGbemendeOppenheimerBruce I.SelinJennifer L.2012. “The House as a Stepping Stone to the Senate: Why Do So Few African American House Members Run?.” American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 387–99.
51.
JuenkeEric GonzalezShahParu. 2016. “Demand and Supply: Racial and Ethnic Minority Candidates in White Districts.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics1 (1): 60–90.
52.
KamCindy D.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.2013. “Name Recognition and Candidate Support.” American Journal of Political Science57 (4): 971–86.
53.
KennyChristopherMcBurnettMichael. 1994. “An Individual-Level Multiequation Model of Expenditure Effects in Contested House Elections.”American Political Science Review88 (3): 699–707.
54.
KitchensKarin E.SwersMichele L.2016. “Why Aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections.” Politics & Gender12 (4): 648–76.
55.
KochJeffrey W.2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 453–62.
56.
La Cour DabelkoKirstenHerrnsonPaul S.1997. “Women’s and Men’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives, Women’s and Men’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly50(1): 121–35.
57.
LawlessJennifer L.FoxRichard. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
LawlessJennifer L.PearsonKathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics70 (1): 67–82.
59.
LieskeJoel. 1989. “The Political Dynamics of Urban Voting Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science33 (1): 150–74.
60.
LowandeKennethRitchieMelindaLauterbachErinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science63 (3): 644–59.
61.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes..’”The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–57.
McDermottMonika L.1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 270–83.
64.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
PearsonKathrynMcGheeEric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics & Gender9 (4): 439–62.
68.
PhilpotTasha S.WaltonHanes. 2007. “One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and the Voters Who Support Them.” American Journal of Political Science51 (1): 49–62.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology35 (2): 245–66.
74.
ShahParuScottJamilJuenkeEric Gonzalez. 2019. “Women of Color Candidates: Examining Emergence and Success in State Legislative Elections.” Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (2): 429–43.
75.
SigelmanCarol K.SigelmanLeeWalkoszBarbara J.NitzMichael. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 243–65.
76.
SojkaLaura. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of State Variation on Gender and Race through Campaign Finance.” PhD diss. The University of Alabama. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1993.
77.
StrolovitchDara Z.2006. “Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender.” The Journal of Politics68 (4): 894–910.
78.
TeslerMichael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 690–704.
79.
ThomsenDanielle M.SwersMichele L.2017. “Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 449–63.
WilsonDavid C.DavisDarren W.2018. “Appraisals of President Obama’s Economic Performance: Racial Resentment and Attributional Responsibility.” Electoral Studies55:62–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
