We examine women’s access to campaign resources using data from all 960 candidates competing in Chile’s 2017 legislative elections. Even when controlling for district characteristics, women candidates receive less money in party transfers, bank loans, and donations; place fewer personal funds in their campaigns; and have fewer resources overall. However, previous experience and incumbency narrow the gap. When women are newcomers, gender serves as an important cue about candidate quality and funders default to favoring men. Our results lend credence to practitioners’ claims that money disadvantages women candidates in democracies, but focuses attention on the disadvantage faced by women newcomers. Moreover, this gender gap in campaign funding exists despite a gendered electoral financing scheme designed to make political actors more likely to invest in women’s campaigns. While increasingly popular among development experts, our research suggests such schemes might be insufficient for equalizing campaign funding between men and women.
AchinC.LévêqueS.DurovicA.LépinardE.MazurA. G. (2020). Parity sanctions and campaign financing in France: Increased numbers, little concrete gender transformation. In MuriaasR.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing: money, power and representation in comparative perspective (pp. 27-54). Routledge.
2.
AdamsB. E.,SchreiberR. (2011). Gender, campaign finance, and electoral success in municipal elections. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 83-97.
3.
Arce RiffoJ. (2018). Ley de Cuotas a la Chilena: Notas para una autopsia. In Miranda LeibeL.Suárez CaoJ. (Eds.), La política siempre ha sido cosa de mujeres: Elecciones y protagonistas en Chile y la región (pp. 77-94). FLACSO-Chile.
4.
BallingtonJ.,KahaneM. (2014). Women in politics: Financing for gender equality. In FalgueraE.JonesS.OhmanM. (Eds.), Funding of political parties and elections campaigns: A handbook on political finance (pp. 301-343). International IDEA.
5.
BauerG.,DarkwahA. (2020). ‘Some money has to be going’: Discounted filing fees to bring more women into parliament in Ghana. In MuriaasR.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing: Money, power and representation in comparative perspective (pp. 133-153). Routledge.
6.
BjarnegårdE. (2013). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment: Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BlaisA.,LagoI. (2009). A general measure of district competitiveness. Electoral Studies, 28, 94-100.
8.
BoC.,NaviaP. (2016a). Evolución de la presencia y éxito de las candidatas en elecciones en Chile, 1989-2009. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 40, 117-138.
9.
BoC.,NaviaP. (2016b). Los determinantes de los componentes del gasto electoral en elecciones municipales en Chile, 2008-2012. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 7, 57-90.
10.
BorgesA. C.MuriaasR. L.WangV. (2020). Legislated candidate quotas with reward for compliance in Cabo Verde: Victory for no one? In MuriaasR.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing: Money, power and representation in comparative perspective (pp. 74-91). Routledge.
11.
BoukaY.BerryM. E.KamuruM. M. (2019). Womenʼs political inclusion in Kenyaʼs devolved political system. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13, 313-333.
12.
BuckleyF.,GregoryR. (2020). Gendering candidate selection in Ireland: Incentivizing parties through state funding. In MuriaasR.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing: Money, power and representation in comparative perspective (pp. 55-73). Routledge.
13.
BunkerK.,NaviaP. (2015). Incumbency advantage and tenure length in the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1989-2009. Revista de Ciencia Política, 35, 251-271.
14.
BurrellB. C. (1985). Womenʼs and menʼs campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972-1982. A finance gap?American Politics Quarterly, 13, 251-272.
15.
BurrellB. C. (1996). A womanʼs place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. University of Michigan Press.
16.
BurrellB. C. (2014). Gender in campaigns for the US House of Representatives. University of Michigan Press.
17.
CarrollS. J.,SanbonmatsuK. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford University Press.
18.
Casas-ZamoraK.,ZovattoD. (2015). The cost of democracy: Campaign finance regulation in Latin America. Latin American Initiative, Foreign Policy at Brookings.
19.
CaulM. (1999). Womenʼs representation in parliament. Party Politics, 5, 79-98.
20.
CofféH.,Davidson-SchmichL. K. (2020). The gendered political ambition cycle in mixed-member electoral systems. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3, 79-99.
21.
CrespinM. H.,DeitzJ. L. (2010). If you canʼt join ʼem, beat ʼem: The gender gap in individual donations to congressional candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 581-593.
22.
Crowder-MeyerM.,CoopermanR. (2018). Canʼt buy them love: How party culture among donors contributes to the party gap in womenʼs representation. The Journal of Politics, 80, 1211-1224.
23.
FeoF.,PiccioD. R. (2019). Promoting gender equality through party funding: Symbolic policies at work in Italy. Politics & Gender, 16(3), 903-929. doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000308.
24.
FranceschetS. (2005). Women and politics in Chile. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
25.
FranceschetS.,PiscopoJ. M. (2014). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 85-110.
26.
FuentesC. S. (2017). Las nuevas reglas del juego político en Chile: Partidos, campañas, y probidad. Fundación F. Ebert.
27.
FunkK. D.HinojosaM.PiscopoJ. M. (2017). Still left behind: Gender, political parties, and Latin Americaʼs pink tide. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24, 399-424.
28.
GamboaR.,MoralesM. (2016). Chileʼs 2015 electoral reform: Changing the rules of the game. Latin American Politics and Society, 58, 126-144.
29.
HeerwigJ. A.,GordonK. M. (2018). Buying a voice: Gendered contribution careers among affluent political donors to federal elections, 1980-2008. Sociological Forum, 33, 805-825.
30.
HinojosaM. (2009). ‘Whatever the party asks of me’: Women’s political representation in Chile’s Unión Demócrata Independiente. Politics & Gender, 5, 377-407.
31.
HinojosaM. (2012). Selecting women, electing women: Political representation and candidate selection in Latin America. Temple University Press.
32.
HinojosaM.,Vázquez CorreaL. (2018). Selección de candidaturas, partidos y mujeres en América Latina. In FreidenbergF.CaminottiM.Muñoz-PogossianB.DošekT. (Eds.), Mujeres en la política: Experiencias nacionales y subnacionales en América Latina (pp. 35-67). Instituto Electoral de la Ciudad de México e Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas UNAM.
33.
HoganR. E. (2007). The effects of candidate gender on campaign spending in state legislative elections. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 1092-1105.
34.
HughesM. M.PaxtonP.ClaytonA. B.ZetterbergP. (2019). Global gender quota adoption, implementation, and reform. Comparative Politics, 51, 219-238.
JacobsonG. C. (1980). Money in congressional elections. Yale University Press.
37.
JenkinsS. (2007). A womanʼs work is never done? Fund-raising perception and effort among female state legislative candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 230-239.
38.
JohnsonM.C. (2020). Training programs in Benin: Empowering women but missing party support and financing. In ShamesS.L.BernhardR.HolmanM.R.TeeleD.L. (Eds.), Good reasons to run: Women and political candidacy (pp. 258-271). Temple University Press.
39.
JosefssonC. (2020). How candidate selection structures and genders political ambition:Illustrations from Uruguay. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3, 61-78.
40.
KayuniH. M.,MuriaasR. L. (2014). Alternatives to gender quotas: Electoral financing of women candidates in Malawi. Representation, 50, 393-404.
41.
KennyM. (2013). Gender and political recruitment: Theorizing institutional change. Springer.
42.
KreitzerR. J.,OsbornT. L. (2019). The emergence and activities of womenʼs recruiting groups in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7, 842-852.
43.
Martínez OssaA.,NaviaP. (2017). Determinantes de la nominación y éxito de las candidatas en elecciones municipales en Chile, 2004-2012. Revista SAAP, 11, 35-67.
44.
MuriaasR. L.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.). (2020). Gendered electoral financing: Money, power and representation in comparative perspective. Routledge.
45.
OhmanM. (2018). Gender-targeted public funding for political parties: A comparative analysis. International IDEA.
PiscopoJ.M. (2021). Replication data for: Follow the money: Gender, incumbency, and campaign funding in Chile. Harvard Dataverse.
48.
SacchetT. (2018). Why gender quotas don’t work in Brazil? The role of the electoral system and political finance. Colombia Internacional, 95, 25-54.
49.
SanbonmatsuK.,RogersK. (2020). Advancing research on gender and gubernatorial campaign finance. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 41, 351-359.
50.
ScarrowS. E. (2007). Political finance in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 193-210.
51.
SchneiderP. (2019, April 9-12). Violence against women in elections and gendered electoral violence: Preliminary findings from Uganda. Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, Belgium, Mons.
52.
Schwindt‐BayerL. A. (2009). Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 5-28.
Shair-RosenfieldS.,HinojosaM. (2014). Does female incumbency reduce gender bias in elections? Evidence from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 837-850.
55.
SiavelisP. M. (2016). Crisis of representation in Chile? The institutional connection. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8, 61-93.
56.
SmuldersJ.PutG.-J.MaddensB. (2019). How legislative gender quotas affect the gender gap in campaign spending: An analysis of the federal and regional elections in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29, 41-60.
57.
SpeckB. W.,MancusoW. P. (2014). A study on the impact of campaign finance, political capital and gender on electoral performance. Brazilian Political Science Review, 8, 34-57.
58.
ThomsenD. M.,SwersM. L. (2017). Which women can run? Gender, partisanship, and candidate donor networks. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 449-463.
59.
WangV.KayuniH. M.ChiwezaA.SoyiyoS. (2020). Relieving women’s costs of standing for election: Malawi’s 50:50 campaigns. In MuriaasR.WangV.MurrayR. (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing: Money, power and representation in comparative perspective (pp. 114-132). Routledge.
60.
WylieK. N. (2018). Party institutionalization and womenʼs representation in democratic Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
61.
WylieK.Dos SantosP.MarcelinoD. (2019). Extreme non-viable candidates and quota maneuvering in Brazilian legislative elections. Opinião Pública, 25, 1-28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
