Deservingness theory contends that spending on the elderly is widely supported across age groups because, unlike other groups such as immigrants or the unemployed, senior citizens are perceived as morally worthy of social aid. However, through a survey experiment in Japan, a prototypical aging society, this study shows that in a state with a large population of senior citizens, there is a significant age gap in policy preferences with the working-age population demonstrating stronger opposition to government support for the elderly. To induce empathetic policy attitudes toward the elderly, therefore, effective issue framing is necessary. However, emphasizing economic need is not enough; it is only when both the elderly’s economic need and effort to work are emphasized that we see a positive attitudinal change among the working-age population. In addition, we find that the economically secure are more sensitive to senior citizens’ economic need and effort to work in determining their policy support. By contrast, the economically insecure exhibit unqualified support for the elderly. These findings demonstrate that deservingness for the elderly is not innate, but is driven by conditional altruism. Furthermore, our work emphasizes the importance of issue framing in generating intergenerational solidarity in a rapidly aging society.
AarøeLenePetersenMichael Bang. 2014. “Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues.” The Journal of Politics76 (3): 684–97.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoAngeletosGeorge-Marios. 2005. “Fairness and Redistribution.” American Economic Review95 (4): 960–80.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoGlaeserEdwardSacerdoteBruce. 2001. “Why Doesn’t the U.S. Have a European-style Welfare System?” NBER Working Paper no. w8524. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8524.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoMianoArmandoStantchevaStefanie. 2018. “Immigration and Redistribution.” NBER Working Paper No. w24733. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24733.
5.
AlmåsIngvildCappelenAlexander W.SørensenErik Ø.TungoddenBertil. 2010. “Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance.” Science328 (5982): 1176–78.
6.
AndersonKaren M.LynchJulia. 2007. “Reconsidering Seniority Bias: Aging, Internal Institutions, and Union Support for Pension Reform.” Comparative Politics39 (2): 189–208.
BoeriTitoBörsch-SupanAxelTabelliniGuido. 2001. “Would You Like to Shrink the Welfare State? A Survey of European Citizens.” Economic Policy16 (32): 7–50.
BreyerFriedrichCraigBen. 1997. “Voting on Social Security: Evidence from OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Economy13 (4): 705–24.
11.
BrowningEdgar K.1975. “Why the Social Insurance Budget Is Too Large in a Democracy.” Economic Inquiry13 (3): 373–88.
12.
BuchananJames M.1986. Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s. New York: New York University Press.
13.
BurgoonBrianDekkerFabian. 2010. “Flexible Employment, Economic Insecurity and Social Policy Preferences in Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy20 (2): 126–41.
BusemeyerMarius R.GoerresAchimWeschleSimon. 2009. “Attitudes towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures from Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy19 (3): 195–212.
16.
DimickMatthewRuedaDavidStegmuellerDaniel. 2017. “The Altruistic Rich? Inequality and Other-Regarding Preferences for Redistribution.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science11 (4): 385–439.
17.
DworkinRonald. 2002. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
EmmeneggerPatrickMarxPaulSchraffDominik. 2015. “Labour Market Disadvantage, Political Orientations and Voting: How Adverse Labour Market Experiences Translate into Electoral Behaviour.” Socio-Economic Review13 (2): 189–213.
FongChristina M.2007. “Evidence from an Experiment on Charity to Welfare Recipients: Reciprocity, Altruism and the Empathic Responsiveness Hypothesis.” The Economic Journal117 (522): 1008–24.
21.
FraileMartaFerrerMariona. 2005. “Explaining the Determinants of Public Support for Cuts in Unemployment Benefits Spending across OECD Countries.” International Sociology20 (4): 459–81.
22.
FrohlichNormanOppenheimerJoe. 1994. “Preferences for Income Distribution and Distributive Justice: A Window on the Problems of Using Experimental Data in Economics and Ethics.” Eastern Economic Journal20 (2): 147–55.
23.
GilensMartin. 1995. “Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare.” The Journal of Politics57 (4): 994–1014.
24.
GilensMartin. 2009. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
GoerresAchimKarlsenRuneKumlinStaffan. 2020. “What Makes People Worry about the Welfare State? A Three-Country Experiment.” British Journal of Political Science50 (4): 1519–37.
26.
HäusermannSilja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HelgasonAgnar FreyrMérolaVittorio. 2017. “Employment Insecurity, Incumbent Partisanship, and Voting Behavior in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies50 (11): 1489–1523.
28.
HessMoritzNaumanEliasSteinkopfLeander. 2017. “Population Ageing, the Intergenerational Conflict, and Active Ageing Policies—A Multilevel Study of 27 European Countries.” Journal of Population Ageing10 (1): 11–23.
29.
HuddyLeonieJonesJeffrey M.ChardRichard E.2001. “Compassionate Politics: Support for Old-Age Programs among the Non Elderly.” Political Psychology22 (3): 443–71.
30.
Jaime-CastilloAntonio M.2013. “Public Opinion and the Reform of the Pension Systems in Europe: The Influence of Solidarity Principles.” Journal of European Social Policy23 (4): 390–405.
31.
JensenCarstenPetersenMichael Bang. 2017. “The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care.” American Journal of Political Science61 (1): 68–83.
32.
KondoAyako. 2016. “Effects of Increased Elderly Employment on Other Workers’ Employment and Elderly’s Earnings in Japan.” IZA Journal of Labor Policy5 (1): 1–23.
33.
KonowJames. 2001. “Fair and Square: The Four Sides of Distributive Justice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization46 (2): 137–64.
34.
KonowJames. 2003. “Which Is the Fairest One of all? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories.” Journal of Economic Literature41 (4): 1188–1239.
35.
KristovLorenzoLindertPeterMcClellandRobert. 1992. “Pressure Groups and Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics48 (2): 135–63.
36.
KweonYesola. 2018. “Types of Labor Market Policy and the Electoral Behavior of Insecure Workers.” Electoral Studies55:1–10.
37.
LaenenTijs. 2020. Welfare Deservingness and Welfare Policy, Popular Deservingness Opinions and Their Interaction with Welfare State Policies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
38.
LainDavidVickerstaffSarah. 2014. “Working beyond Retirement Age: Lessons for Policy.” In International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14437_19.html.
39.
LarsenChristian Albrekt. 2008. “The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support.” Comparative Political Studies41 (2): 145–68.
40.
LeeSophia Seung-yoon. 2013. “High Non-standard Employment Rates in the Republic of Korea and Japan: Analyzing Policy Configurations with Fuzzy-Set/QCA.” Policy and Society32 (4): 333–44.
41.
LeeSophia Seung-yoon. 2016. “Institutional Legacy of State Corporatism in De-industrial Labour Markets: A Comparative Study of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.” Socio-Economic Review14 (1): 73–95.
42.
LeventhalGerald S.1976. “The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology9:91–131.
43.
LevittSteven D.ListJohn A.2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives21 (2): 153–74.
44.
LinosKaterinaWestMartin. 2003. “Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution. Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation.” European Sociological Review19 (4): 393–409.
MarxPaul. 2014. “Labour Market Risks and Political Preferences: The Case of Temporary Employment.” European Journal of Political Research53 (1): 136–59.
MoeneKarl OveWallersteinMichael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review95:859–74.
49.
NaoiMegumiKumeIkuo. 2015. “Workers or Consumers? A Survey Experiment on the Duality of Citizens’ Interests in the Politics of Trade.” Comparative Political Studies48 (10): 1293–1317.
50.
NaumannElias. 2017. “Do Increasing Reform Pressures Change Welfare State Attitudes? An Experimental Study on Population Ageing, Pension Reform Preferences, Political Knowledge and Ideology.” Ageing & Society37 (2): 266–94.
51.
OeschDaniel. 2006. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Germany, Britain, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
OshioTakashiOishiAkiko S.ShimizutaniSatoshi. 2018. “Social Security Programs and the Elderly Employment in Japan.” NBERWorking Paper No. 25243. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25243.
54.
OshioTakashiUsuiEmikoShimizutaniSatoshi. 2018. “Labor Force Participation of the Elderly in Japan.” NBERWorking Paper No. 24614. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24614.
55.
PetersenMichael BangSlothuusRuneStubagerRuneTogebyLise. 2011. “Deservingness versus Values in Public Opinion on Welfare: The Automaticity of the Deservingness Heuristic.” European Journal of Political Research50 (1): 24–52.
RazinAssafSadkaEfraim. 2007. “Aging Population: The Complex Effect of Fiscal Leakages on the Politico-Economic Equilibrium.” European Journal of Political Economy23 (2): 564–75.
58.
ReeskensTimvan der MeerTom. 2019. “The Inevitable Deservingness Gap: A Study into the Insurmountable Immigrant Penalty in Perceived Welfare Deservingness.” Journal of European Social Policy29 (2): 166–81.
59.
RehmPhilipp. 2016. Risk Inequality and Welfare States: Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RehmPhilippHackerJacob S.SchlesingerMark. 2012. “Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State.” American Political Science Review106:386–406.
61.
RuedaDavid. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
RuedaDavid. 2018. “Food Comes First, Then Morals: Redistribution Preferences, Parochial Altruism, and Immigration in Western Europe.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 225–39.
63.
RuffleBradley J.1998. “More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.” Games and Economic Behavior23 (2): 247–65.
ShayoMoses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review103:147–74.
66.
SinnHans-WernerUebelmesserSilke. 2003. “Pensions and the Path to Gerontocracy in Germany.” European Journal of Political Economy19 (1): 153–58.
67.
SjoblomKriss. 1985. “Voting for Social Security.” Public Choice45 (3): 225–40.
68.
SlothuusRune. 2007. “Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment.” Scandinavian Political Studies30 (3): 323–44.
69.
SørensenRune J.2013. “Does Aging Affect Preferences for Welfare Spending? A Study of Peoples’ Spending Preferences in 22 Countries, 1985–2006.” European Journal of Political Economy29:259–71.
70.
SteinerViktor. 2017. “The Labor Market for Older Workers in Germany.” Journal for Labour Market Research50 (1): 1–14.
UmedaMichio.2020. “The Politics of Aging: Age Difference in Welfare Issue Salience in Japan 1972–2016.” Political Behavior. Published electronically 4 July. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09627-0.
75.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. World Population Prospects 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/.
Van OorschotWim. 2000. “Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public.” Policy & Politics28 (1): 33–48.
78.
Van OorschotWim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy16 (1): 23–42.
79.
WendtClausMischkeMonikaPfeiferMichaela. 2011. Welfare States and Public Opinion: Perceptions of Healthcare Systems, Family Policy and Benefits for the Unemployed and Poor in Europe. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
