Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Public support for redistributive policies (e.g., Medicaid) depends in part on the perceived need and deservingness of beneficiaries. However, the average citizen is not well informed about the economic conditions of their fellow citizens. In this article, we explore how information about average earnings of the working poor (a group generally seen as deserving) influences support for redistributive spending. Two survey experiments test whether support for such spending is affected by information about the average incomes of low-wage occupations (e.g., home health aides and retail sales workers). We additionally explore potential mechanisms for this effect, including empathy. An exploratory study finds an effect, but a pre-registered confirmatory study yields substantively small findings with inconsistent significance. Even when participants both receive detailed information about low-wage occupations’ salaries and are encouraged to recall people who they know in those jobs, the treatment has no substantial effect. Given the strength of this treatment and the lack of consistent effects, we conclude that interventions providing information about low-income salaries (e.g., in news coverage or interpersonal conversation) are unlikely to have a substantive effect on support for redistribution.

Keywords

information effects public opinion support for redistribution survey experiment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accountability Office Government . (2020). Federal social safety net programs: Millions of full-time workers rely on federal health care and food assistance programs. Accountability Office Government.

Ansolabehere

Meredith

Snowberg

(2012). Asking about numbers: Why and how. Political Analysis, 21(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps031

Batson

Ahmad

(2009). Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3(1), 141–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01013.x

Bisgaard

(2019). How getting the facts right can fuel partisan-motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12432

Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2021). Occupational employment statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Ciani

Freget

Manfredi

(2021). Learning about inequality and demand for redistribution: A meta-analysis of in-survey informational experiments (No. 02). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/8876ec48-en

Cook

Barrett

E. J.

(1992). Support for the American welfare state: The views of Congress and the public. Columbia University Press.

Coppock

Gross

Porter

Thorson

Wood

T. J.

(2023). Conceptual replication of four key findings about factual corrections and misinformation during the 2020 US election: Evidence from panel-survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 1328–1341. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123422000631

Druckman

J. N.

Leeper

T. J.

(2012). Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x

10.

Eriksson

Simpson

(2012). What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500003284

11.

Gimpelson

Treisman

(2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103

12.

Goren

Federico

Kittilson

(2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.x

13.

Harth

Kessler

Leach

C. W.

Wayne

(2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207309193

14.

Hoy

Mager

(2019). Why are relatively poor people not more supportive of redistribution? Evidence from a randomized survey experiment across 10 countries (No. 2019-489). American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(4), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190276

15.

Karadja

Möllerström

Seim

(2017). Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00623

16.

Katz

(1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. Pantheon Books.

17.

Konrath

Meier

B. P.

Bushman

B. J.

(2018). Development and validation of the single item trait empathy scale (SITES). Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.009

18.

Kuziemko

Norton

M. I.

Saez

Stantcheva

(2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. The American Economic Review, 105(4), 1478–1508. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130360

19.

Lane

R. E.

(2001). Self-reliance and empathy: The enemies of poverty – and of the poor. Political Psychology, 22(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00250

20.

Lawrence

E. D.

Sides

(2014). The consequences of political innumeracy. Research & Politics, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014545414

21.

Luttmer

E. F. P.

(2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1086/321019

22.

Moniz

(2022). Facts in context: Problem perceptions, numerical information, and policy attitudes. American Politics Research, 51(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221148674

23.

Newman

B. J.

(2022). Economic inequality, the working poor, and belief in the American dream. Public Opinion Quarterly, 86(4), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac043

24.

Orth

(2022). Three-quarters of Americans think the federal minimum wage is too low. YouGov. https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2022/12/01/most-americans-think-minimum-wage-is-too-low.

25.

Petersen

M. B.

Slothuus

Stubager

Togeby

(2011). Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 24–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01923.x

26.

Petersen

M. B.

Sznycer

Cosmides

Tooby

(2012). Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology, 33(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00883.x

27.

Piston

(2018). Class attitudes in America: Sympathy for the poor, resentment of the rich, and political implications. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Pontusson

Giger

Rosset

Lascombes

D.-K.

(2020). Introducing the inequality and politics survey: Preliminary findings. University of Geneva. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33389.74720

29.

Trump

K. S.

(2018). Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences. British Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 929–952. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000326

30.

Zilinsky

(2014). Learning about income inequality: What is the impact of information on perceptions of fairness and preferences for redistribution? Working Paper. Technische Universität München.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB