Political parties in developing country democracies are often characterized by undemocratic internal party practices, including for selecting party organizational leaders. Scholars identify institutional, party-level, and demographic factors as driving such practices. In this paper, we contribute to this research by considering the effect of two personal factors—personal religiosity and membership in a political family. Politicians act in accordance with personal values and strategic incentives. We argue religiosity influences both in ways that undermine support for democratic intra-party selection practices. We hypothesize that membership in a political family increases the undemocratic effects of high religiosity because it strengthens the capacity of highly religious dynasts to access and mobilize politically through religious and family networks. This strengthens their strategic independence from their party, leading them to support undemocratic leadership selection practices. We test this prediction for the case of Turkey using original data from a 2017 survey of 200 Turkish politicians. We find that religiosity is only associated with reduced support for democratic leadership selection practices among politicians who are members of political families. This result is robust to the inclusion of party-specific effects, religious party membership, and individual characteristics including support for political Islam.
AratYeşimPamukŞevket. 2019. Turkey between Democracy and Authoritarianism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AvivEfrat. 2018. “The İsmailağa community and its relationship with the AK party, Democracy and Security,” DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2018.1428897
6.
BasedauM.2018. “The Multidimensional Effects Of Religion On Socioeconomic Development: A Review Of The Empirical Literature” Journal of Economic Surveys32(4): 1106–1133
7.
BasedauMatthiasGobienSimonePredigerSebastian. 2018. “The Multidimensional Effects of Religion on Socioeconomic Development.” Journal of Economic Surveys32 (4): 1106–33.
8.
BayraktarS. UlasAltanCemal. 2013. “Explaining Turkish Party Centralism.” In Negotiating Political Power in Turkey: Breaking Up the Party, edited by in EliseMassicardWattsNicole F., 17–36. New York: Routledge.
9.
Beit-HallahmiBenjamin. 2015. Psychological Perspectives on Religion and Religiosity. New York: Routledge.
BloomPAzit Ben-NunArikanGizem. 2012. “Religion and Support for Democracy: A Cross-national Test of the Mediating Mechanisms.” British Journal of Political Science43 (2): 375–97.
12.
CareyJohn M.2007. “Political Institutions, Competing Principals, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science51:92–107.
13.
CareyJohn M.Polga-HecimovichJohn. 2006. “Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America.” Journal of Politics68 (3): 530–43.
14.
ChandraKanchan. 2016. “Democratic Dynasties.” In Democratic Dynasties: State, Party and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics, edited by ChandraKanchan, 12–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ChhibberPradeep. 2011. “Dynastic Parties: Organization, Finance and Impact.” Party Politics19 (2): 277–95.
16.
CiftciSabriWuthrichMichaelShamailehAmmar. 2019. “Islam, Religious Outlooks, and Support for Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly72 (2): 435–49.
17.
CrossWilliamBlaisAdré. 2012. “Who Selects the Party Leader?”Party Politics18 (2): 127–50.
18.
CrossWilliamPiletJean-Benoit. 2016. The Politics of Party Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
CruzCesiLabonneJulienQuerubínPablo. 2017. “Politician Family Networks and Electoral Outcomes.” American Economic Review107 (10): 3006–37.
20.
DjupePaulNeiheiselJacob. 2019. “Political Mobilization in American Congregations.” Politics and Religion12:123–52.
21.
DynesAdamHassellHansMilesMatthew. 2018. “The Personality of the Politically Ambitious.” Political Behavior41:309–336. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9452-x.
22.
EligürBanu. 2010. The Mobilization of Political Islam in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
EvertonSean. 2018. Networks and Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FoxJonathan. 2015. Political Secularism, Religion, and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GeysBennySmithDaniel M.2017. “Political dynasties in democracies: causes, consequences and remaining puzzles.” The Economic Journal127(October): F446–F454.
26.
GuidaMichaelangelo. 2013. “Friendship, Kingship and Interest.” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations12 (4): 65–76.
27.
HallDeborahMatzDavid C.WoodWendy. 2010. “Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach?”Personality and Social Psychology Review14:126–39.
28.
Hasani-MavriqiIlire. 2016. “The Influence of Social Status and Network Structure on Consensus Building in Collaboration Networks.” Social Networks6:80. doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0389-y.
29.
IlyasAhmet. 2009. “‘Türkiye’de Aşiret-Siyaset Ilişkisi: Urfa Örneği [Tribal-Political Relations in Turkey: The Example of Urfa] (1950-2003).” Dissertation Selçuk University.
30.
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB.et al (eds.). 2017-2020. World Values Survey: Round Seven - Turkey, Madrid: JD Systems Institute. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp
31.
JohnsonMegan K.RowattWade C.LaBouffJordan. 2010. “Priming Christian Religious Concepts Increases Racial Prejudice.” Social Psychological and Personality Science1:119–26.
32.
KenigOfer. 2009. “Classifying Party Leaders’ Selection Methods in Parliamentary Democracies.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties19 (4): 433–47.
KenigOferRahatGideonTuttnauerOr. 2015. “Competitiveness of Party Leadership Selection Processes.” In The Politics of Party Leadership, edited by CrossWilliamPiletJean-benoit, 50–72. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
KitscheltHerbert. 1989. “The Internal Politics of Parties.” Political Studies37 (3): 400–21.
36.
KoenigHaroldAl ZabenFatenKhalifaDoaa AhmedAl ShohaibSaad. 2015. “Measures of Religiosity.” In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, edited by BoyleGregory J.SaklofskeDonald H.MatthewsGerald, 530–561. London: Elsevier.
37.
LewisValerieMacGregorCarolPutnamRobert. 2013. “Religion, Networks, and Neighborliness.” Social Science Research42 (2): 331–46. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.011.
38.
LinzJuanStepanAlfred. 1997. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LordCeren. 2018. Religious Politics in Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MainwaringScott. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MillerArthurHesliVickiReisingerWilliam. 1995. “Comparing Citizen and Elite Belief Systems in Post-soviet Russia and Ukraine.” Public Opinion Quarterly59 (1): 1–40.
42.
MuraokaTaishi. 2018. “ Political Dynasties and Particularistic Campaigns” Political Research Quarterly7(2): 453–466
43.
MusilPelin. 2011. Authoritarian Party Structure and Democratic Political Settings in Turkey. New York: Palgrave.
44.
NorrisPippa. 2004. Building Political Parties. Stockholm: International Institue for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
45.
NorrisPippaInglehartRobert. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PatrikiosStratosChatzikonstantinouMichalis. 2015. “Dynastic Politics: Family Ties in the Greek Parliament, 2000–12.” South European Society and Politics20 (1): 93–111.
47.
DjupePaulGilbertChristopher. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pew Research Center. 2014. “Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe.” http://www.pewforum.org/.
51.
PoguntkeThomasScarrowSusanWebbPaul. 2016. “Party Rules, Party Resources and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies.” Party Politics22 (6): 661–78.
52.
PurdeyJemma. 2016. “Political Families in Southeast Asia.” Southeast Asia Research24 (3): 319–27.
53.
PutnamRobert D.CampbellDavid E.2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.
54.
RandallVickySvåsandLars. 2002. “Party Institutionalization in New Democracies.” Party Politics8 (1): 5–29.
55.
RossiMartín. 2017. “Self-perpetuation of Political Power.” Economic Journal127 (605): F455–73.
56.
SamejimaF.1969. “Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores.” Psychometrika Monograph Supplement34 (4, Pt. 2): 100.
57.
SaroglouVassilisCorneilleOliverVan CappellenPatty. 2009. “Speak, Lord, Your Servant is Listening: Religious Priming Activates Submissive Thoughts and Behaviors.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion19:143–54.
58.
SaroglouVassilisDelpierreVanessaDernelleRebecca. 2004. “Values and Religiosity.” Personality and Individual Differences37 (4): 721–34.
59.
SayariSabriMusilPelin AyanDemirkolŐzhan. 2018. Party Politics in Turkey. New York: Routledge.
60.
ScarrowSusan. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.
61.
SchwartzShalom H. 1992. “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” Advances in experimental social psychology25: 1–65.
62.
SchwartzShalom H.HuismansSipke. 1995. “Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions.” Social Psychology Quarterly58 (2): 88–107.
63.
SchwedlerJillian. 2011. “Can Islamists become moderates: Rethinking the inclusion-moderation hypothesis.” World Politics 63, no.2: 347–376.
64.
SlapinJonathan B.KirklandJustin H.LazzaroJoseph A.LesliePatrick A.O’GradyTom. 2018. “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament.” American Political Science Review112 (1): 15–30.
65.
SmithDanielMartinShane. 2017. “Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly42 (1): 131–65.
66.
SmithEdwardMenonTanyaThompsonLeigh. 2012. “Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks.” Organization Science23 (1): 67–82.
67.
SpieringsNiels. 2019. “Social Trust in the Middle East and North Africa.” European Sociological Review35 (6): 894–911. doi:10.1093/esr/jcz038.
68.
TademTeresa S. EncarnacionTademEduardo C.2016. “Political Dynasties in the Philippines.” South East Asia Research24 (3): 328–40.
69.
TavitsMargit. 2009. “The Making of Mavericks Local Loyalties and Party Defection.” Comparative Political Studies42 (6): 793–815.
70.
TESEV. 1998. Siyasi Partilerde Reform. “Reform in Political Parties” Istanbul, Turkey: TESEV Publications.
71.
UysalAysenTopakOguz. 2010. “Partisans: Construction of Parties and Social Networks in Turkey.” Particiler Türkiye’de Partiler ve Sosyal Ağlarin Ĺnşasi. Istanbul, Turkey: ĺlteşim Yayinlari.
72.
Van CapellenOlivier CorneilleColsStéphanieSarogluVassilis. 2011. “Beyond Mere Compliance to Authoritative Figures.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion21:97–106.
73.
WaltonJeremy. 2017. Muslim Civil Society and the Politics of Religious Freedom in Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press.
74.
WhiteJenny. 2001. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
75.
WisneskiDaniel C.LytleBrad L.SkitkaLinda J.2009. “Gut Reactions: Moral Conviction, Religiosity and Trust in Authority.” Psychological Science20:1059–63.
76.
YadavVineeta. 2021. Religious Parties and the Politics of Civil Liberties. New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
YavuzHakan. 2003. Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
