While protests occurring in nationally democratic contexts rarely represent fundamental threats to the central state, they still need management when and where they occur. Thus, this paper suggests that, especially in federal countries, to explain the repression of protest, we must examine subnational politics. Subnational political elites, often tasked with protest management, can engage protesters and call for police restraint, but their capacity and authority affect their ability to carry out these tasks. The paper tests the theory using original event-level data on Mexican protests and responses and leverages within-country variations in democracy and state capacity. The paper shows that where subnational governments have bureaucratic capacity and where citizen linkages to the state cause them to see state agents as relevant, problem-solving authorities, protest events are less likely to be managed using a repressive response. In addition, the paper highlights a key difference between explanations of overall human rights violations and repressive responses to protest, namely, that electoral competition is not a significant factor reducing the likelihood of repressive responses to protest.
Academic from Morelos. 2009. Research Interview with Author. Morelos, Mexico, February23.
2.
AlmeidaPaul D.2003. “Opportunity Organizations and Threat-Induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings.” American Journal of Sociology109 (2): 345–400.
3.
ArceMoisésRiceRoberta. 2009. “Societal Protest in Post-stabilization Bolivia.” Latin American Research Review44 (1): 88–101.
4.
AuyeroJavier. 2007. Routine Politics and Violence in Argentina: The Gray Zone of State Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AyoubPhillip. 2010. “Repressing Protest: Threat and Weakness in the European Context, 1975-1989.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly15 (4): 465–88.
6.
BellinEva. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics36 (2): 139–57.
7.
BoudreauVince. 2005. “Precarious Regimes and Matchup Problems in the Explanation of Repressive Policy.” In Repression and Mobilization, edited by DavenportChristianJohnstonHankMuellerCarol McClurg, 33–57. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
BrockettCharles D.2005. Political Movements and Violence in Central America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BruhnKathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
10.
BruhnKathleen. 2008. Urban Protest in Mexico and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceDownsGeorge W.SmithAlastairCherifFeryal Marie. 2005. “Thinking Inside the Box: A Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly49:439–57.
12.
CareySabine C.2006. “The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression.” Political Research Quarterly59 (1): 1–11.
13.
ChenowethEricaStephanMaria J. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Columbia Studies in Terrorism and Irregular Warfare. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
CONAPO. 2005. El II Conteo de Población y Vivienda 2005 y Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo 2005 (IV Trimestre). Mexico City: National Population Council.
15.
CorneliusWayne A.1999. “Subnational Politics and Democratization: Tensions between Center and Periphery in the Mexican Political System.” In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, edited by CorneliusWayne A.EisenstadtTodd A.HindleyJane, 3–16. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
16.
DallinAlexanderBreslauerGeorge W. 1970. Political Terror in Communist Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
17.
DavenportChristian. 1995. “Multi-dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 683–713.
18.
DavenportChristian. 2007. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DavenportChristianArmstrongDavid A.II. 2004. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.” American Journal of Political Science48 (3): 538–54.
20.
Della PortaDonatellaReiterHerbert, eds. 1998. Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
Della PortaDonatellaReiterHerbert. 2013. “Policing Protest.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.Della PortaDonatellaKlandermansBertMcAdamDoug, 937–43. Malden: Wiley.
22.
Díaz-CayerosAlberto. 2004. “Decentralization, Democrati-zation, and Federalism in Mexico.” In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, edited by MiddlebrookKevin J., 198–234. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
23.
EarlJennifer. 2003. “Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression.” Sociological Theory21 (1): 44–68.
24.
EarlJennifer. 2013. “Repression and Social Movements.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.Della PortaDonatellaKlandermansBertMcAdamDoug, 1083–89. Malden: Wiley.
25.
EarlJenniferMartinAndrewMcCarthyJohn D.SouleSarah A. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology30:65–80.
26.
EarlJenniferSouleSarah A. 2006. “Seeing Blue: A Police-Centered Explanation of Protest Policing.” Mobilization11 (2): 145–64.
27.
EarlJenniferSouleSarah A.McCarthyJohn D. 2003. “Protest Under Fire? Explaining the Policing of Protest.” American Sociological Review68 (4): 581–606.
28.
EisenstadtTodd A.2003. “Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Informal Electoral Institutions and Mexico’s Political Opening.” Latin American Politics and Society45 (1): 25–54.
29.
EnglehartNeil A.2009. “State Capacity, State Failure, and Human Rights.” Journal of Peace Research46 (2): 163–80.
30.
FernandezLuis A.2008. Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti-globalization Movement. Critical Issues in Crime and Society. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
31.
FranklinJames C.2009. “Contentious Challenges and Government Responses in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly62 (4): 700–14.
32.
FranzosiRoberto. 2004. From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science. Vol. 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
GamsonWilliam A.2013. “Social Control Errors.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.Della PortaDonatellaKlandermansBertMcAdamDoug, 1185–87. Malden: Wiley.
34.
GaventaJohn. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
GibsonEdward L.2005. “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics58 (1): 101–32.
36.
GibsonEdward L.2010. “Politics of the Periphery: An Introduc-tion to Subnational Authoritarianism and Democratization in Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America2 (2): 3–12.
37.
GiraudyAgustina. 2009. Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity after Democratization: Argentina and Mexico in Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
38.
GiraudyAgustina. 2010. “The Politics of Subnational Undemo-cratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America2 (2): 53–84.
39.
GiraudyAgustina. 2012. “Conceptualizing State Strength: Moving Beyond Strong and Weak States.” Revista de Ciencia Política32 (3): 599–611.
40.
GiraudyAgustina. 2015. Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity within Democratic Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
GiraudyAgustinaMoncadaEduardoSnyderRichard. 2019. “Subnational Research in Comparative Politics: Substantive, Theoretical, and Methodological Contributions.” In Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics, edited by SnyderRichardMoncadaEduardoGiraudyAgustina, 3–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
GreeneSamuel A.RobertsonGraeme B. 2010. “Politics, Justice and the New Russian Strike.” Communist and Post-communist Studies43 (1): 73–95.
43.
Instituto Ciudadano de Estudios sobre la Inseguridad (ICEDI). 2005. Tercera Encuesta Nacional sobre Inseguridad 2005 (ENSI-3): Análisis de Resultados. Mexico City: Instituto Ciudadano de Estudios sobre la Inseguridad.
44.
InclánMaría de la Luz. 2009. “Repressive Threats, Procedural Concessions, and the Zapatista Cycle of Protests, 1994–2003.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (5): 794–819.
45.
INEGI. 2011a. Encuesta Nacional de Gobierno 2010: Poder Ejecutivo Estatal. Aguascalientes: Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography.
46.
INEGI. 2011b. Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de Mexico: Producto Interno Bruto por Entidad Federativa, 2005-2009. Aguascalientes: Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography.
47.
JobardFabien. 2013. “Police Autonomy.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by SnowDavid A.Della PortaDonatellaKlandermansBertMcAdamDoug, 934–36. Malden: Wiley.
48.
KoopmansRuud. 1993. “The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989.” American Sociological Review58 (5): 637–58.
49.
KurtzMarcus J.2013. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
LawsonChappell H.2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
LeibfriedStephanHuberEvelyneLangeMatthewLevyJonah D.NullmeierFrankStephensJohn D., eds. 2015. Oxford Handbook on Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
LichbachMark Irving. 1987. “Deterrence or Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent.” Journal of Conflict Resolution31 (2): 266–97.
53.
LunaJuan PabloSoiferHillel David. 2017. “Capturing Sub-national Variation in State Capacity: A Survey-Based Approach.” American Behavioral Scientist61 (8): 887–907.
54.
MackinAnna E.2016. “Executive Constraints and Repression in Democratic Contexts: The Case of Land Protests in Brazil.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 175–88.
55.
MagaloniBeatrizZepedaGuillermo. 2004. “Democratiza-tion, Judicial and Law Enforcement Institutions, and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, edited by MiddlebrookKevin J., 168–97. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
56.
MainwaringScottBrinksDanielPérez-LiñánAníbal. 2001. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945-1999.” Studies in Comparative International Develop-ment36 (1): 37–65.
57.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Power of Black Insurgency. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McPhailClarkMcCarthyJohn D. 2005. “Protest Mobilization, Protest Repression, and Their Interaction.” In Repression and Mobilization, edited by DavenportChristianJohnstonHankMuellerCarol McClurg, 3–32. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
MoscovichLorena. 2012. “From Top to Bottom (and Back to the Top Again): Federal Spending, Sub-national Coalitions, and Protests in Argentina, 2002–2006.” Journal of Politics in Latin America4 (1): 35–72.
61.
Oaxacan Activist. 2009. Research Interview with Author. Oaxaca, Mexico, March17.
62.
Oaxacan Journalist. 2009. Research Interview with Author. Oaxaca, Mexico, January29.
63.
OberschallAnthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
64.
OliverPamela. 2008. “Repression and Crime Control: Why Social Movement Scholars Should Pay Attention to Mass Incarceration as a Form of Repression.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly13 (1): 1–24.
65.
OsorioJavierReyesAlejandro. 2017. “Supervised Event Coding from Text Written in Spanish: Introducing Eventus ID.” Social Science Computer Review35 (3): 406–16.
66.
PoeSteven C.TateC. Neal. 1994. “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis.” American Political Science Review88 (4): 853–72.
67.
RaslerKaren. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review61 (1): 132–52.
68.
ReamesBenjamin Nelson. 2007. “A Profile of Police Forces in Mexico.” In Reforming the Administration of Justice in Mexico, edited by CorneliusWayne A.ShirkDavid A., 117–32. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
69.
ReganPatrick M.HendersonErrol A. 2002. “Democracy, Threats and Political Repression in Developing Countries: Are Democracies Internally Less Violent?” Third World Quarterly23 (1): 119–36.
70.
RíosViridianaShirkDavid A. 2011. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis through 2010. San Diego: Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, University of San Diego.
71.
RitterEmily HenckenConradCourtenay R. 2016. “Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression.” American Political Science Review110 (1): 85–99.
72.
RobertsonGraeme B.2011. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Rocha QuinteroJorge. 2010. “Public Security and Human Rights: Reflections on the Experience of Jalisco.” In Police and Public Security in Mexico, edited by DonnellyRobert A.ShirkDavid A., 197–223. San Diego: University Readers.
74.
RoddenJonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics36 (4): 481–500.
75.
SchmitterPhilippe C.KarlTerry Lynn. 1991. “What Democracy Is . . . and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy2 (5): 75–88.
76.
SchockKurt. 2005. Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
77.
SlaterDanFennerSofia. 2011. “State Power and Staying Power: Infrastructural Mechanisms and Authoritarian Durability.” Journal of International Affairs65 (1): 15–29.
78.
SoiferHillelvom HauMatthias. 2008. “Unpacking the Strength of the State: The Utility of State Infrastructural Power.” Studies in Comparative International Development43 (3–4): 219–30.
79.
SouleSarahDavenportChristian. 2009. “Velvet Glove, Iron Fist, or Even Hand? Protest Policing in the United States, 1960-1990.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly14 (1): 1–22.
80.
SullivanChristopher M.2016. “Undermining Resistance: Mobilization, Repression, and the Enforcement of Political Order.” Journal of Conflict Resolution60 (7): 1163–90.
81.
SullivanHeather. 2019. “Sticks, Stones, and Broken Bones: Protest Violence and the State.” Journal of Conflict Resolution63 (3): 700–26.
82.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83.
TillyCharles. 2006. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84.
TrejoGuillermoAltamiranoMelina. 2016. “The Mexican Color Hierarchy: How Race and Skin Tone Still Define Life Chances 200 Years after Independence.” In The Double Bind: The Politics of Racial and Class Inequalities in the Americas, edited by HookerJulietTillery Jr.Alvin B., 3–16. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
85.
UildriksNiels A.2010. Mexico’s Unrule of Law: Implementing Human Rights in Police and Judicial Reform under Democratization. Lanham: Lexington Books.
86.
Varela MaldonadoCarlo Ángel. 2004. México Electoral. Mexico City: Banco Nacional de México.
87.
WaddingtonP. A. J.1998. “Controlling Protest in Contemporary Historical and Comparative Perspective.” In Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies, edited by PortaDonatella DellaReiterHerbert, 117–40. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
88.
WangYuhuaMinznerCarl. 2015. “The Rise of the Chinese Security State.” The China Quarterly222:339–59.
89.
WhiteRobert W.WhiteTerry Falkenberg. 1995. “Repression and the Liberal State: The Case of Northern Ireland, 1969-1972.” Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (2): 330–52.
90.
Zepeda LecuonaGuillermo. 2010. “Mexican Police and the Criminal Justice System.” In Police and Public Security in Mexico, edited by DonnellyRobert A.ShirkDavid A., 39–63. San Diego: University Readers.
91.
Zepeda LecuonaGuillermo. 2012. Seguridad y Justicia Penal en los Estados: 25 Indicadores de Nuestra Debilidad Institucional. Mexico City: México Evalúa.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
