Research shows that female legislators tend to support liberal, pacifistic approaches to foreign policy. But it remains unclear whether they are dovish because they seek to represent the dovish values of women generally or because they tend to represent mostly liberal voters. To answer this question, we examine all foreign policy votes cast in Congress over the last five decades to estimate the ideological locations of House and Senate members on a hawk-dove dimension. Once we control for partisan and constituency effects, we find only limited evidence that female legislators are more dovish than their male counterparts are.
AldrichJohn H.GelpiChristopherFeaverPeterReiflerJasonSharpKristin Thompson. 2006. “Foreign Policy and the Electoral Connection.” Annual Review of Political Science9:477–502.
2.
AldrichJohn H.MontgomeryJacob M.SparksDavid B. 2014. “Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses.” Political Analysis22:435–56.
3.
BaltagiBadi. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BarberMichaelMcCartyNolan. 2016. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Political Negotiation: A Handbook, edited by MansbridgeJaneMartinCathie Jo, 37–90. Washington, DC: Brookings.
5.
BartelsLawrence. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.” American Political Science Review85:457–74.
6.
BaumMatthew A.PotterPhilip B. K. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
Canes-WroneBrandiceBradyDavid W.CoganJohn F. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review96:127–40.
8.
Canes-WroneBrandiceHowellWilliam G.LewisDavid E. 2008. “Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis.” Journal of Politics70:1–16.
9.
CaprioliMary. 2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research37:51–68.
10.
CaprioliMaryBoyerMark A. 2001. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45:503–18.
11.
CarterRalph G.1989. “Senate Defense Budgeting, 1981-1988: The Impacts of Ideology, Party, and Constituency Benefit on the Decision to Support the President.” American Politics Quarterly17:332–47.
12.
ClaytonAmandaZetterbergPär. 2018. “Quota Shocks: Electoral Gender Quotas and Government Spending Priorities Worldwide.” Journal of Politics80:916–32.
13.
ClintonJoshuaJackmanSimonRiversDouglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review98:355–70.
14.
CroninPatrickFordhamBenjamin O. 1999. “Timeless Principles or Today’s Fashion? Testing the Stability of the Linkage between Ideology and Foreign Policy in the Senate.” Journal of Politics61:967–98.
15.
DittmarKellySanbonmatsuKiraCarrollSusan J. 2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
DodsonDebra L.2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
DolanKathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder: Westview Press.
18.
DolanKathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior32:69–88.
19.
EichenbergRichard C.2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990-2003.” International Security28:110–41.
20.
FowlerLinda L.2015. Watchdogs on the Hill: The Decline of Congressional Oversight of U.S. Foreign Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
GelmanAndrewHillJennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeter D.ReiflerJason. 2006. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” International Security30:7–46.
23.
GoldsteinJoshua S.2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HersmanRebecca K. C.2000. Friends and Foes: How Congress and the President Really Make Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25.
HildebrandtTimothyHillebrechtCourtneyHolmPeter M.PevehouseJon. 2013. “The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology.” Foreign Policy Analysis9:243–66.
26.
HolstiOle R.RosenauJames N. 1996. “Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link between Domestic and International Affairs.” International Political Science Review17:29–54.
JackmanSimon. 2001. “Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identification, Estimation, Inference, and Model Checking.” Political Analysis9:227–41.
29.
JenkinsJeffery A.CrespinMichael H.CarsonJamie L. 2005. “Parties as Procedural Coalitions in Congress: An Examination of Differing Career Tracks.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30:365–89.
30.
JenkinsShannon. 2012. “How Gender Influences Roll Call Voting.” Social Science Quarterly93:415–33.
31.
JeongGyung-Ho. 2018. “Measuring Foreign Policy Positions of Members of the US Congress.” Political Science Research and Methods6:181–96.
32.
JeongGyung-HoQuirkPaul J. 2019. “Division at the Water’s Edge: The Polarization of Foreign Policy.” American Politics Research47:58–87.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
KarolDavid. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KingdonJohn W.1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
KnechtThomas. 2010. Paying Attention to Foreign Affairs: How Public Opinion Affects Presidential Decision Making. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
38.
KnechtThomasWeatherfordM. Stephen. 2006. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Stages of Presidential Decision Making.” International Studies Quarterly50:705–27.
39.
KochMichael T.FultonSarah A. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” Journal of Politics73:1–16.
40.
LazarusJeffreySteigerwaltAmy. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability: How Women Work Harder to Stay in Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41.
LeeFrances E.2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
MartinAndrew D.QuinnKevin M. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999.” Political Analysis10:134–53.
43.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44.
NincicMiroslavNincicDona J. 2002. “Race, Gender, and War.” Journal of Peace Research39:547–68.
45.
NincicMiroslavRamosJennifer M. 2010. “Ideological Structure and Foreign Policy Preferences.” Journal of Political Ideologies15:119–41.
46.
NorranderBarbara. 1999. “The Evolution of the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly63:566–76.
47.
PalmerBarbaraSimonDennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
48.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheriHughesMelanie M. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology22:263–84.
49.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 2007. Ideology & Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
50.
RobertsJason M.SmithSteven S.HaptonstahlStephen R. 2016. “The Dimensionality of Congressional Voting Reconsidered.” American Politics Research44:794–815.
51.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science46:20–34.
52.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.CorbettaRenato. 2004. “Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29:215–29.
53.
ShapiroRobert Y.MahajanHarpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly50:42–61.
54.
SheaPatrick E.ChristianCharlotte. 2017. “The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution61:2043–73.
55.
SobelRichard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
SullivanJohn L.ShawL. EarlMcAvoyGregory E.BarnumDavid G. 1993. “The Dimensions of Cue-Taking in the House of Representatives: Variation by Issue Area.” Journal of Politics55:975–97.
57.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
SwersMichele L.2007. “Building a Reputation on National Security: The Impact of Stereotypes Related to Gender and Military Experience.” Legislative Studies Quarterly32:559–95.
59.
SwersMichele L.2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
TheriaultSean M.2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
ZegartAmy B.2011. Eyes on Spies: Congress and the United States Intelligence Community. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
