Scholars of gender and race politics have long drawn links between the media’s less than favorable treatment of women and minorities, and these candidates’ struggles to curry favor with voters. However, few have examined minority women’s coverage. This multimethodological study examines the nature and implications of the media’s treatment of Anglo, Latina, and African American congresswomen. The results indicate significant differences in the content of these women’s media coverage and its influence on voters’ attitudes. The implications of these findings for Anglo and minority women campaigning for and holding elective office are discussed.
ArnoldR. Douglas. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
BanwartMary ChristineBystromDianne G.RobertsonTerry. 2003. “From the Primary to the General Election: A Comparative Analysis of Candidate Media Coverage in Mixed-Gender 2000 Races for Governor and U.S. Senate.” American Behavioral Scientist46 (5): 658-76.
3.
BedollaLisa G.2007. “Intersections of Inequality: Understanding Marginalization and Privilege in the Post-Civil Rights Era.” Politics & Gender3 (2): 232-48.
4.
BedollaLisa G.TateKatherineWongJanelle. 2005. “Indelible Effects: The Impact of Women of Color in the U.S. Congress.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, edited by ThomasSueWilcoxClyde, 2nd ed., 152-175. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BoboLawrenceGilliamFranklin D.1990. “Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 377-93.
6.
BullockCharles S.III. 1984. “Racial Crossover Voting in the Election of Black Officials.” Journal of Politics46 (1): 238-51.
7.
BurnsNancySchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8.
BystromDiane. 2006. “Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication along the Campaign Trail.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by CarrollSusanFoxRichard, 169-188. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BystromDianne G.BanwartMary ChristineKaidLynda LeeRobertsonTerry A.2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewsStyle. New York: Routledge.
10.
CaliendoStephen M.McIlwainCharlton D.2006. “Minority Candidates, Media Framing. Racial Cues in the 2004 Election.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11 (4): 45-69.
11.
CanonDavid T.1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of the Black Majority Districts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
CarrollSusan J.SchreiberRonnee. 1997. “Media Coverage of Women in the 103rd Congress.” In Women, Media and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 131-48. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Center for Women and Politics, Women of Color in Elective Office. 2010. National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University, http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/index.php.
14.
Center for Women and Politics, Women in Elective Office. 2010. National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/index.php.
15.
ChaudharyAnju. 1980. “Press Portrayal of Black Officials.” Journalism Quarterly57 (4): 636-46.
16.
CrenshawKimberle W.1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” 139-167. University of Chicago Legal Forum.
17.
CrenshawKimberle, W.1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241-99.
18.
DaltonRussell J.BeckPaul A.HuckfeldtRobert. 1998. “Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review92 (1): 111-26.
19.
DolanJulieKropfJonathan S.2004. “Credit Claiming from the US House: Gendered Communication Styles?”Harvard International Journal of Press Politics9 (1): 41-59.
20.
DolanKathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’”American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 272-93.
21.
EntmanRobert M.1994. “Representation and Reality in the Portrayal of Blacks on Network Television News.” Journalism Quarterly71 (3): 509-20.
22.
EntmanRobert M.1997. “African Americans According to TV News.” In The Media in Black and White, edited by DennisEverette E.PeaseEdward C., 29-36. New Brunswick: Transaction.
23.
FoxRichard L.2000. “Gender in Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men and the Political Process, edited by Tolleson-RinehartSueJosephsonJyl, 227-56. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
24.
FragaLuis R.Martinez-EbersValerieRamirezRicardoLopezLinda. 2003. “Gender and Ethnicity: The Political Incorporation of Latina and Latino State Legislators.” Paper presented at the Inequality and Social Policy Seminar, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Harvard University.
25.
GayClaudineTateKatherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology19 (1): 169-84.
26.
GershonSarah A.2012. “When Race, Gender and the Media Intersect: Unfavorable News Coverage of Minority Congresswomen.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy (published online May 11, 2012, doi 10.1080/1554477X.2012.667743)
27.
GibbonsArnold. 1993. “Race, Politics and the White Media. The Jesse Jackson Campaigns.” Lanham: University Press of America.
GraberDoris A.2010. “Mass Media and American Politics.” Washington, DC: CQ Press.
30.
HancockAnge-Marie. 2007a. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.” Politics and Gender3 (2): 248-54.
31.
HancockAnge-Marie. 2007b. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics5 (1): 63-79.
32.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 529-50.
HoffmanLindsey H.2006. “Is Internet Content Different after All? A Content Analysis of Mobilizing Information in Online and Print Newspapers.” Journalism & Mass Communication83 (1): 58-76.
35.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 503-25.
36.
HughsMelanie M.2007. “Complications at the Intersection: Overcoming the Challenges of Cross-National Research on Minority Women’s Legislative Representation.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
37.
JalalzaiFarida. 2006. “Women Candidates and the Media: 1992-2000 Elections.” Politics & Policy34 (3): 606-33.
38.
JaramilloPatricia A. “Building a Theory, Measuring a Concept: Exploring Intersectionality and Latina Activism.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy (forthcoming).
39.
KahnKim F.1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
KahnKim F.KenneyPatrick J.1999. The Spectacle of the US Senate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
KahnKim F.KenneyPatrick J.2002. “The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens’ Views of Candidates.” American Political Science Review96 (2): 381-94.
42.
KayeBarbara K.JohnsonThomas J.2003. “From Here to Obscurity? Media Substitution Theory and Traditional Media in an On-line World.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54 (3): 260-73.
43.
LarsonStephanie Greco. 1992. Creating the Consent of the Governed: A Member of Congress and the Local Media. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44.
LawrenceRegina G.RoseMelody. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics & the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
45.
LienPei-teE.O. SwainKatie. 2012. “Local Executive Leaders: At the Intersection of Race and Gender.” In Women and Executive Office: Pathways and Performance, edited by RoseMelody, 137-158. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
46.
MaierScott R.2010. “Newspapers Offer More News than Do Major Online Sites.” Newspaper Research Journal31 (1): 6-19.
47.
MayerWilliam G.1993. “Poll Trends: Trends in Media Usage.” Public Opinion Quarterly57 (4): 593-611.
48.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895-918.
49.
MoncriefGaryThompsonJoelSchulmannRobert. 1991. “Gender, Race and the State Legislature: A Research Note on the Double Disadvantage Hypothesis.” Social Science Journal28 (4): 481-7.
50.
MontoyaLisa J.Hardy-FantaCarolGarciaSonia. 2000. “Latina Politics: Gender, Participation and Leadership.” PS: Political Science & Politics33 (3): 555-61.
51.
NivenDavid. 2002. Tilt? The Search for Media Bias. Westport: Praeger.
52.
NivenDavidZilberJeremy. 2001. “How Does she Have Time for Kids and Congress? Views on Gender and Media Coverage from House Offices.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, edited by O’ConnorKaren, 147-66. New York: Haworth Press.
53.
PayneGregory J.1988. Shaping the Race Issue: A Special Kind of Journalism Political Communication and Persuasion5:145-60.
PhilpotTashaWaltonHanesJr.2007. “One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and the Voters Who Support Them.” American Journal of Political Science51 (1): 49-62.
56.
ReevesKeith. 1997. Voting Hopes or Fears? White Voters, Black Candidates and Racial Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchaffnerBrian. 2002. “The Role of Race and Gender on Local Congressional TV News.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
58.
SchaffnerBrianGadsonMark. 2004. “Reinforcing Stereotypes? Race and Local Television News Coverage of Congress.” Social Science Quarterly85 (3): 604-23.
59.
SigelmanCarol K.SigelmanLeeWalkoszBarbara J.NitzMichael. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 243-65.
60.
SigelmanLeeSigelmanCarol K.1982. “Sexism, Racism and Ageism in Voting Behavior: An Experimental Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly45 (4): 263-9.
61.
SimienEvelyn M.2007. “Doing Intersectionality Research: From Conceptual Issues to Practical Examples.” Politics and Gender3 (2): 264-71.
62.
SimienEvelyn M.ClawsonRosalee A.2004. “The Intersection of Race and Gender: An Examination of Black Feminist Consciousness, Race Consciousness, and Policy Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly85 (3): 792-810.
63.
SingerJane B.2001. “The Metro Wide Web: Changes in Newspapers’ Gatekeeping Role Online.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly78 (1): 65-80.
64.
SmithKevin B.1997. “When All’s Fair: Signs of Parity in Media Coverage of Female Candidates.” Political Communication14 (1): 71-82.
65.
SmoothWendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics & Gender2 (3): 400-14.
66.
TerkildsenNayda. 1993. “When White Voters Evaluate Black Candidates: The Processing Implications of Candidate Skin Color, Prejudice, and Self-Monitoring.” American Journal of Political Science37 (4): 1032-53.
67.
TerkildsenNayda. 1996. “Media Coverage of Congressional Elections: Linking African American Candidates to Their Race.” Presented as the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
68.
TerkildsenNaydaDamoreDavid F.1999. “The Dynamics of Racialized Media Coverage in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 680-99.
69.
VinsonDanielle. 2003. Local Media Coverage of Congress and its Members: Through Local Eyes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
70.
ZilberJeremyNivenDavid. 2000. Racialized Coverage of Congress: The News in Black and White. Westport: Praeger.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
