How do party reputations change over time? We construct a measure of the common movement in the parties’ perceived policy handling abilities for the period 1980 to 2016 and investigate its relationship with the public’s evaluation of Congress and the president. In contrast to key claims made in theories of congressional parties, we find an inconsistent relationship between evaluations of Congress and party reputations and find no evidence that successful agenda control enhances the majority party’s reputation. Instead, our analysis shows a strong relationship between party reputations and presidential approval, reaffirming the central role the president plays in shaping party reputations.
AdlerE. ScottWilkersonJohn D.2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AldrichJohn H.1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.TomlinsonAndrew R.2000. “Fractional Integration Methods in Political Science.” Electoral Studies19 (1): 63–76.
4.
BrasherHolly. 2009. “The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations.” Party Politics15 (1): 69–92.
5.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
6.
CavariAmnon. 2014. “The Interplay of Macropartisanship and Macrohandling, and the 2012 Electoral Success of the Democratic Party.” In The 2012 Presidential Election: Forecasts, Outcomes, and Consequences, edited by CavariAmnonPowellRichardMayerKenneth, 83–102. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
ChanleyVirginia A.RudolphThomas J.RahnWendy M.2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly64 (3): 239–56.
8.
ConoverPamela JohnstonFeldmanStanley. 1989. “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science33 (4): 912–40.
9.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DurrRobert H.GilmourJohn B.WolbrechtChristina. 1997. “Explaining Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 175–207.
12.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichael B.StimsonJames A.2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GrantTaylorLeboMatthew J.2016. “Error Correction Methods with Political Time Series.” Political Analysis24 (1): 3–30.
14.
GreenJaneJenningsWill. 2017. The Politics of Competence: Parties, Public Opinion and Voters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
JacobsonGary. 2012. “The President’s Effect on Partisan Attitudes.” Presidential Studies Quarterly42 (4): 683–99.
16.
JacobsonGary. 2015. “How Presidents Shape Their Party’s Reputation and Prospects: New Evidence.” Presidential Studies Quarterly45 (1): 1–28.
17.
JonesDavid R.2010. “Partisan Polarization and Congressional Accountability in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science54 (2): 323–37.
18.
JonesDavid R.2013. “Do Major Policy Enactments Affect Public Evaluations of Congress? The Case of Health Care Reform.” Legislative Studies Quarterly38 (2): 185–204.
19.
JonesDavid R.2015. “Partisan Polarization and the Effect of Congressional Performance Evaluations on Party Brands and American Elections.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 185–204.
20.
JonesDavid R.McDermottMonika L.2009. Americans, Congress, and Democratic Responsiveness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
JonesDavid R.McDermottMonika L.2011. “The Salience of the Democratic Congress and the 2010 Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics44 (2): 297–301.
22.
KeeleLuke. 2007. “Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 241–54.
23.
KeyValdimer Orlando. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24.
KiewietD. RoderickMcCubbinsMathew D.1991. The Logic of Delegation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
KochJeffrey W.2001. “When Parties and Candidates Collide: Citizen Perception of House Candidates’ Positions on Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly65 (1): 1–21.
26.
KogerGregoryLeboMatthew J.2017. Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
KramerGerald H.1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review65 (1): 131–43.
28.
LavineHoward G.JohnstonChristopher D.SteenbergenMarco R.2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
LodgeMiltonHamillRuth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review80 (2): 505–19.
30.
LupiaArthur. 2015. Uninformed: Why People Know so Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.StimsonJames A.1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review83 (4): 1125–42.
32.
MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.StimsonJames A.1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the US Economy.” American Political Science Review86 (3): 597–611.
33.
MayhewDavid R.1991. Divided We Govern. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
NorpothHelmut. 2001. “Divided Government and Economic Voting.” The Journal of Politics63 (2): 414–35.
35.
PopeJeremyWoonJonathan. 2009. “Measuring Changes in American Party Reputations, 1939–2004.” Political Research Quarterly62 (4): 653–61.
36.
RahnWendy M.1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (2): 472–96.
37.
RamirezMark D.2009. “The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 681–94.
38.
SchattschneiderElmer Eric. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart.
39.
SnyderJames M.Jr.TingMichael M.2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 90–110.
40.
StimsonJames A.1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.
41.
StokesDonald E.MillerWarren. 1962. “Party Government and the Saliency of Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly26 (4): 531–46.
42.
TufteEdward R.1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review69 (3): 812–26.
43.
WoonJonathanPopeJeremy C.2008. “Made in Congress? Testing the Electoral Implications of Party Ideological Brand Names.” The Journal of Politics70 (3): 823–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
