Scholars increasingly emphasize that party reputations are valuable electoral assets. The authors measure temporal change in the parties’ relative reputations across several distinct policy areas and find that each party tends to have advantages on certain issues but that the patterns are far from permanent. Democrats have strong advantages on social welfare issues, but Republicans have made some gains. Republican advantages on taxes and “law and order” have been weaker. The authors also find that party competition has strengthened impressions of the parties. Results support the notion that parties carry a collective—if occasionally transitory—reputation on a host of issues.
Aldrich, John.1995Why parties?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar.1994. Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: The joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns . Public Opinion Quarterly58 (3): 335-57.
3.
Baumer, Donald, and Howard Gold.1995. Party images and theAmerican electorate. American Politics Quarterly23 (1): 33-61.
4.
Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes.1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Cox, Gary, and Mathew McCubbins .1993. Legislative leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
8.
Freeman, John R.1989. Systematic sampling, temporal aggregation, and the study of political relationships. In Political analysis, Vol. 1, ed. James Stimson, 61-98. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Geer, John.1991. The electorate’s partisan evaluations: Evidence of a continuing democratic edge. Public Opinion Quarterly55 (2): 218-31.
10.
---. 1992. New Deal issues and the American electorate, 1952-1988 . Political Behavior14 (1): 45-65.
11.
Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler.1998. Macropartisanship: A replication and critique. American Political Science Review92 (4): 883-99.
12.
Hetherington, Marc.2001. Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization . American Political Science Review95 (3): 619-31.
13.
Key, V.O.1961. Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
14.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew McCubbins .1991. The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Konda, Thomas, and Lee Sigelman .1987. Public evaluations of the American parties, 1952-1984. Journal of Politics49 (3): 814-29.
16.
McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal .2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Nie, Norman, John Petrocik, and Sidney Verba.1976. The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Petrocik, John.1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 825-50.
19.
Poole, Keith, and Howard Rosenthal .1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll-call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Pope, Jeremy C., and Jonathan Woon.2008. Made in Congress? Testing the electoral implications of party ideological brand names. Journal of Politics70 (3): 823-36.
21.
Sanders, Arthur.1988. The meaning of party images. Western Political Quarterly41 (3): 583-99.
22.
Simon, Adam.2002. The winning message. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Snyder, James M., Jr., and Michael M. Ting .2002. An informational rationale for political parties. American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 90-110.
24.
Stimson, James A.1999. Public opinion in America: Mood, cycles, and swings. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.
25.
Sundquist, James L.1983. Dynamics of the party system: Alignment and realignment of political parties in the United States. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
Wattenberg, Martin.1984. The decline of American political parties, 1956-1980. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
