Do economic performance and economic news coverage influence public perceptions of the economy? Efforts to assess the effects are hampered by the interrelationships among the variables. In this paper, we bring to bear a more careful accounting of available economic variables than previous studies have used. We find that both media tone and economic attitudes are strongly related to actual economic performance. Moreover, after taking into account the economy itself, a substantial relationship between media tone and economic attitudes persists. Given that economic attitudes influence a wide variety of political outcomes, this finding carries important normative and political significance.
AchenChristopher H.2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables.” Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, 20-22 July 2000.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. July20-22, 2000
3.
AlthausScott L.EdyJill A.PhalenPatricia F.2001. “Using Substitutes for Full-Text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text Is Best?” American Journal of Political Science45 (3): 707–23.
4.
BarberáPabloBoydstunAmber E.LinnSuzannaNaglerJonathan. 2016. “Methodological Challenges in Measuring Tone: Application to News Coverage of the U.S. Economy.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 1-4 September 2016.
5.
BloodDeborah J.PhillipsPeter C. B.1995. “Recession Headline News, Consumer Sentiment, the State of the Economy and Presidential Popularity: A Time Series Analysis 1989–1993.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research7 (1): 2–22.
6.
BoydstunAmber E.2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CaseyGregory P.OwenAnn L.2013. “Good News, Bad News, and Consumer Confidence.” Social Science Quarterly94 (1): 292–315.
8.
CookTimothy E.1998. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
De BoefSuzannaKeeleLuke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00307.x.
10.
De BoefSuzannaKellstedtPaul M.2004. “The Political (And Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence.” American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 633–49.
11.
DomsMarkMorinNorman. 2004. “Consumer Sentiment, the Economy, and the News Media.” In Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Washington, DC: Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, pp 1–30.
FanDavid P.CookR. Dennis. 2003. “A Differential Equation Model for Predicting Public Opinion and Behaviors from Persuasive Information: Application to the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology27 (1): 29–51.
14.
FogartyBrian J.2005. “Determining Economic News Coverage.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research17 (2): 149–72.
15.
GarethJamesWittenDanielaHastieTrevorTibshiraniRobert. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Vol. 112. Springer, New York.
16.
GoidelRobert K.LangleyRonald E.1995. “Evaluations: Uncovering Evidence of Indirect Media Effects.” Political Research Quarterly48 (2): 313–28.
17.
GoidelRobert K.ProcopioStephenTerrellDekWuH. Denis. 2010. “Sources of Economic News and Economic Expectations.” American Politics Research38 (4): 759–77.
18.
GolanGuy. 2006. “Inter-media Agenda Setting and Global News Coverage: Assessing the Influence of the New York Times on Three Network Television Evening News Programs.” Journalism Studies7 (2): 323–34.
19.
GraberDoris A.DunawayJohanna. 2014. Mass Media and American Politics. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
20.
GrimmerJustinStewartBrandon M.2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis21 (3): 267–97.
21.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.CagleVan M.2004. Media Coverage of Lawrence v. Texas: An Analysis of Content, Tone, and Frames in National and Local News Reporting. New York: GLAAD Center for the Study of Media and Society.
22.
HarringtonDavid E.1989. “Economic News on Television: The Determinants of Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly53 (1): 17–40.
23.
HetheringtonMarc J.1996. “The Media’s Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science40 (2): 372–95.
24.
HibbsDouglas A.2000. “Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Public Choice104 (1/2): 149–80.
25.
HollandersDavidVliegenthartRens. 2011. “The Influence of Negative Newspaper Coverage on Consumer Confidence: The Dutch Case.” Journal of Economic Psychology32 (3): 367–73.
26.
HopkinsDanielKingGary. 2010. “A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 229–47.
27.
KiewietD. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
KlebanovBeata BeigmanDiermeierDanielBeigmanEyal. 2008. “Lexical Cohesion Analysis of Political Speech.” Political Analysis16 (4): 447–63.
29.
KramerGerald H.1971. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review65 (1): 131–43.
30.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1988. “Economics and the American Voter: Past, Present, Future.” Political Behavior10 (1): 5–21.
31.
LoweWill. 2008. “Understanding Wordscores.” Political Analysis16 (4): 356–71.
32.
MacKuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.StimsonJames A.1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Eectorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review86 (3): 597–611.
33.
McCombsMaxwellFunkMarcus. 2011. “Shaping the Agenda of Local Daily Newspapers: A Methodology Merging the Agenda Setting and Community Structure Perspectives.” Mass Communication and Society14 (6): 905–19.
34.
MonroeBurt L.ColaresiMichael P.QuinnKevin M.2008. “Fightin’ Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.” Political Analysis16 (4): 372–403.
35.
MonroeBurt L.SchrodtPhilip A.2008. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Statistical Analysis of Political Text.” Political Analysis16 (4): 351–55.
36.
MutzDiana C.1992. “Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience.” American Journal of Political Science36 (2): 483–508.
37.
NadeauRichardNiemiRichard G.FanDavid P.AmatoTimothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics61 (1): 109–35.
ShillerRobert J.2015. Irrational Exuberance. 3rd ed.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40.
SorokaStuart N.2006. “Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information.” Journal of Politics68 (2): 372–85.
41.
SorokaStuart N.2012. “The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World.” Journal of Politics74 (2): 514–28.
42.
SorokaStuart N.SteculaDominik A.ChristopherWlezien. 2015. “It’s (Change in) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the Media, and Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 457–74.
43.
ThelwallMikeBuckleyKevanPaltoglouGeorgiosCaiDiKappasArvid. 2010. “Sentiment Strength Detection in Short Informal Text.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61 (12): 2544–58.
44.
TufteEdward R.1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review69 (3): 812–26.
45.
Van AtteveldtWouterKleinnijenhuisJanRuigrokNel. 2008. “Parsing, Semantic Networks, and Political Authority Using Syntactic Analysis to Extract Semantic Relations from Dutch Newspaper Articles.” Political Analysis16 (4): 428–46.
46.
WuH. DenisStevensonRobert L.ChenHsiao-ChiGunerZ. Nuray. 2002. “The Conditioned Impact of Recession News: A Time-Series Analysis of Economic Communication in the United States, 1987–1996.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research14 (1): 19–36.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
