Public policies invariably confer or deny benefits to particular citizens. How citizens respond to relevant policies has fundamental implications for democratic responsiveness. We study the beliefs of a core constituency of one of the most celebrated sex non-discrimination policies in U.S. history: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Using a novel survey of college student-athletes, we find strong support for the spirit of the policy, with the vast majority of respondents reporting the opinion that there “should” be equity. Concurrently, student-athletes also perceive mal-distribution among status quo resources and opportunities and believe that redistribution is needed. Furthermore, they are willing to take political action to improve equality. Consistent with our expectations, these beliefs are particularly salient for women and those who perceive persistent sex discrimination in society. Our results reveal “positive policy feedback” among policy beneficiaries of Title IX who mobilize to seek equity in athletics. The dissatisfaction among policy beneficiaries raises questions about democratic responsiveness (e.g., to whom are policymakers and leaders in college athletics responding?) and highlights the political nature of college athletics.
AcostaVivianCarpenterLinda. 2014. “Women in Intercollegiate Sport: A Longitudinal, National Study, Thirty-Seven Year Update, 1977–2014.” www.acostacarpenter.org (accessed August 6, 2017).
2.
AjzenIcekFishbeinMartin. 2005. “The Influence of Attitudes on Behaviors.” In The Handbook of Attitudes, edited by AlbarracinDoloresJohnsonBlair T.ZannaMark P., 173–221. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AronsonPamela. 2003. “Feminists or ‘Postfeminists’? Young Women’s Attitudes toward Feminism and Gender Relations.” Gender & Society17 (6): 903–22.
BaumeisterRoyBratslavskyEllenFinkenauerCatrinVohsKathleen. 2001. “Bad Is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology5 (4): 323–70.
6.
BolzendahlCatherine I.MyersDaniel J.2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974-1998.” Social Forces83 (2): 759–90.
7.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbert. 1982. “The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism: The Case of the United States.” Politics & Society11:51–93.
8.
BoyleKelcey. 2016. “The Potential Title IX Implications of Division I Men’s Basketball & FBS Football Players Being Awarded a Share of Revenues for Their Use of Their Names, Likenesses, and Images Pursuant to the Holding of O’Bannon v. NCAA.” Law School Student Scholarship Paper No. 725, Seton Hall University. http://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/725 (accessed December 28, 2017).
9.
BrakeDeborah. 2010. Getting in the Game: Title IX and the Women’s Sports Revolution. New York: New York University Press.
10.
BruchSarahFerreeMyra MarxSossJoe. 2010. “From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism, and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens.” American Sociological Review75 (2): 205–26.
11.
BurnsNancyGallagherKatherine. 2010. “Public Opinion on Gender Issues: The Politics of Equity and Roles.” Annual Review of Political Science13 (1): 425–43.
12.
BuzuvisErin E.2014. “Title IX Feminism, Social Justice, and NCAA Reform.” Freedom Center Journal1:101–21.
13.
CahnSusan. 1995. Coming on Strong: Gender and Sexuality in Twentieth-Century Women’s Sport. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
CampbellAndrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
CampbellAndrea Louise. 2011. “Policy Feedbacks and the Impact of Policy Designs on Public Opinion.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law36 (6): 961–73.
16.
CampbellAndrea Louise. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science15 (1): 333–51.
17.
ClotfelterCharles T.2011. Big-Time Sports in American Universities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
EdwardsAmanda Ross. 2010. “Why Sport? The Development of Sport as a Policy Issue in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.” Journal of Policy History22 (3): 300–36.
GusmanoMichael K.SchlesingerMarkThomasTracey. 2002. “Policy Feedback and Public Opinion: The Role of Employer Responsibility in Social Policy.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law27 (5): 731–72.
23.
JacobsLawrence R.MettlerSuzanne. Forthcoming. “When and How New Policy Creates New Politics: Examining Feedback Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Public Opinion.” Perspectives on Politics.
24.
KaestnerRobertXuXin. 2010. “Title IX, Girls’ Sports Participation, and Adult Female Physical Activity and Weight.” Evaluation Review34 (1): 52–78.
25.
KaneMary JoLaddaShawn. 2012. Research Digest: 40th Anniversary of Title IX. Rockville: President’s Council on Fitness, Sports, and Nutrition.
26.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 341–55.
27.
KnifsendCaseyGrahamSandra. 2012. “Unique Challenges Facing Female Athletes in Urban High Schools.” Sex Roles67 (3–4): 236–46.
28.
LanterJason R.HawkinsBilly. 2013. “The Economic Model of Intercollegiate Athletics and Its Effects on the College Athlete Educational Experience.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport6:86–95.
29.
LermanAmyMcCabeKatherine. 2017. “Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback.” The Journal of Politics79 (2): 624–41.
LubellMarkZahranSammyVedlitzArnold. 2007. “Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming.” Political Behavior29 (3): 391–414.
32.
McThomasMaryTeslerMichael. 2016. “The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008-2012.” Politics & Gender12 (1): 28–49.
33.
MettlerSuzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back in to Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” American Political Science Review96 (2): 351–65.
34.
MettlerSuzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
MettlerSuzanneSossJoe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics2 (1): 55–73.
36.
National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. 2017. “Title IX at 45: Advancing Opportunity through Equity in Education.” National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, Washington, DC.
37.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. 2017. “45 Years of Title IX: The Status of Women in Intercollegiate Athletics.” National Collegiate Athletic Association, Indianapolis.
National Women’s Law Center. 2012. “Title IX: 40 Years and Counting.” National Women’s Law Center, Washington, DC.
41.
NortonAnne. 2004. Ninety-Five Theses on Politics, Culture, and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press.
42.
Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1979. “A Policy Interpretation: Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics.” Federal Register44 (239). http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9interp.html (accessed March 8, 2016).
PagerDevahShepherdHana. 2008. “The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology34:181–209.
45.
PatashnikEric. 2008. Reforms at Risk: What Happens after Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
PatashnikEricZelizerJulian E.2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics11 (4): 1071–87.
47.
PiersonPaul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics45 (4): 595–628.
ReynoldsCelene. Forthcoming. “The Mobilization of Title IX across Colleges and Universities, 1994-2014.” Social Problems.
50.
RidpathBradley DavidYiamouyiannisAthenaLawrenceHeatherGallesKristen. 2009. “Changing Sides: The Failure of the Wrestling Community’s Challenges to Title IX and New Strategies for Saving NCAA Sport Teams.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport1:255–83.
51.
RoseDeondra. 2015. “Regulating Opportunity: Title IX and the Birth of Gender-Conscious Higher Education Policy.” Journal of Policy History27 (1): 157–83.
52.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
53.
SearsDavid O.TylerTom R.CitrinJackKinderDonald R.1978. “Political System Support and Public Response to the Energy Crisis.” American Journal of Political Science22 (1): 56–82.
54.
SharrowElizabeth. 2017. “‘Female Athlete’ Politic: Title IX and the Naturalization of Sex Difference in Public Policy.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (1): 46–66.
55.
SigelRoberta S.1996. Ambition and Accommodation: How Women View Gender Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
SigelmanLeeWilcoxClyde. 2001. “Public Support for Gender Equality in Athletics Programs.” Women & Politics22 (1): 85–96.
57.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting Soliders and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
58.
SossJoe. 2000. Unwanted Claims: The Politics of Participation in the U.S. Welfare System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59.
SossJoeFordingRichard C.SchramSanford F.2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
SossJoeSchramSanford F.2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review101 (1): 111–27.
61.
StaurowskyEllen. 2014. “College Athletes’ Rights in the Age of the Super Conference: The Case of the All Players United Campaign.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport7 (1): 11–34.
62.
StaurowskyEllenWeightErianne A.2013. “Discov-ering Dysfunction in Title IX Implementation NCAA Administrator Literacy, Responsibility, and Fear.” Journal of Applied Sport Management5 (1): 1–30.
63.
SteinmetzStephanieBianchiAnnamariaTijdensKeaBiffignandiSilvia. 2014. “Improving Web Survey Quality: Potentials and Constraints of Propensity Score Adjustments.” In Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, edited by CallegaroMarioBakerReginald P.BethlehemJelkeGöritzAnja S.KrosnickJon A.LavrakasPaul J., 273–98. West Sussex: Wiley.
64.
StevensonBetsey. 2007. “Title IX and the Evolution of High School Sports.” Contemporary Economic Policy25 (4): 486–505.
65.
StevensonBetsey. 2010. “Beyond the Classroom: Using Title IX to Measure the Return to High School Sports.” The Review of Economics and Statistics92 (2): 284–301.
66.
SuggsWelch. 2005. A Place on the Team: The Triumph and Tragedy of Title IX. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67.
SwimJanet K.AikinKathryn J.HallWayne S.HunterBarbara A.1995. “Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68 (2): 199–214.
68.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
69.
TeslerMichael. 2015. “The Conditions Ripe for Racial Spillover Effects.” Political Psychology36 (S1): 101–17.
70.
U.S. Department of Education. 2012. Title IX: Enforcement Highlights. Washington, DC: Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education.
71.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. 2016. “Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act Data, 2015-16.” https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/ (accessed December 28, 2017).
WeaverR. Kent. 2010. “Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders? Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change.” Journal of Public Policy30 (2): 137–62.
74.
WeaverVesla M.LermanAmy E.2010. “Political Consequences of the Carceral State.” American Political Science Review104 (4): 817–33.
75.
WeldonS. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
76.
WeldonS. Laurel. 2011. When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
77.
WhitesideErinRoessnerAmber. 2018. “Forgotten and Left behind: Political Apathy and Privilege at Title IXs 40th Anniversary.” Communication & Sport6 (1): 3-24.
78.
YanusAlixandraO’ConnorKaren. 2016. “To Comply or Not to Comply: Evaluating Compliance with Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy37 (3): 341–58.
79.
YouGov. 2017. Title IX and Girls in Sport. East Meadow, NY: Women’s Sports Foundation.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
