A sizable literature finds evidence of public responsiveness to policy change, across a range of salient policy domains and countries. We have a very limited sense for what drives this aggregate-level responsiveness, however. One possibility is that individuals learn at least part of what they need to know from mass media. Work tends to emphasize failures in both media coverage and citizens, but little research explores the prevalence of relevant, accurate information in media content, or citizens’ abilities to identify and respond to that information. Using the case of defense spending in the United States, we examine both, through an automated content analysis of thirty-five years of reporting, validated by a coding exercise fielded to survey respondents. Results prompt analyses of the American National Election Study (ANES), tracing both individual-level perceptions of and preferences for defense spending change over time. These results, supplemented by aggregate analyses of the General Social Survey (GSS), illustrate how media might facilitate—but also confuse—public responsiveness.
AalbergTorilPapathanassopoulosStylianosSorokaStuartCurranJamesHayashiKaoriIyengarShantoJonesPaul K.MazzoleniGianpietroRojasHernandoRoweDavidTiffenRodney2013. “International TV News, Foreign Affairs Interest and Public Knowledge. A Comparative Study of Foreign News Coverage and Public Opinion in 11 Countries.” Journalism Studies14 (3): 387–406.
2.
AlthausScott. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AltheideDavid L.1997. “The News Media, the Problem Frame, and the Production of Fear.” Sociological Quarterly38 (4): 647–68.
4.
BarabasJason. 2011. “Review of Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy.” Public Opinion Quarterly75 (1): 192–95.
5.
BarabasJason. 2016. “Democracy’s Denominator: Reassessing Responsiveness with Public Opinion on the National Policy Agenda.” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (2): 437–59.
6.
BarabasJasonJeritJennifer. 2009. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy Specific Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 73–89.
7.
BarabasJasonJeritJenniferPollockWilliamRaineyCarlisle. 2014. “The Question(s) of Political Knowledge.” American Political Science Review108 (4): 840–55.
8.
BartelsLarry M.1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Build Up.” American Political Science Review85 (2): 457–74.
9.
BartelsLarry M.2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics3 (1): 15–31.
10.
BartleJohnDellepiane-AvellanedaSebastianStimsonJames. 2011. “The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005.” British Journal of Political Science41 (2): 259–85.
11.
BaumMatthew A.GroelingTim. 2010. War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Citizen Views of War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
BennettW. Lance. 1988. News: The Politics of Illusion. 2nd Edition.New York: Longman.
13.
BerelsonBernard R.LazarsfeldPaul F.McPheeWilliam N.1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CappellaJoseph N.JamiesonKathleen H.1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. ApterDavid, 206–61. New York: Free Press.
16.
Delli CarpiniMichaelKeeterScott. 1996. What American Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
17.
de VreeseClaes H.2005. “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information Design Journal & Document Design13 (1): 48–59.
18.
DruckmanJames N.2005a. “Does Political Information Matter?”Political Communication22 (4): 515–19.
19.
DruckmanJames N.2005b. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication22 (4): 463–81.
20.
DunawayJohanna. 2011. “Institutional Influences on the Quality of Campaign News Coverage.” Journalism Studies12 (1): 27–44.
21.
DurrRobert H.1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?”American Political Science Review87:158–70.
22.
EichenbergRichardStollRichard. 2003. “Representing Defence: Democratic Control of the Defence Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” Journal of Conflict Resolution47:399–423.
23.
EllisChristopherFaricyChristopher. 2011. “Social Policy and Public Opinion: How the Ideological Direction of Spending Influences Public Mood.” The Journal of Politics73 (4): 1095–110.
24.
EnnsPeter K.KellstedtPaul M.2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science38 (3): 433–54.
25.
EntmanRobert M.1993. “Framing: Toward the Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43 (4): 51–58.
26.
EntmanRobert M.2003. “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame after 9/11.” Political Communication20 (4): 415–32.
27.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichael B.StimsonJames A.2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
EvelandW. P.Jr.2001. “The Cognitive Mediation Model of Learning from the News: Evidence from Nonelection, Off-Year Election, and Presidential Election Contexts.” Communication Research28 (5): 571–601.
29.
EvelandW. P.Jr.2002. “News Information Processing as Mediator of the Relationship between Motivations and Political Knowledge.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79 (1): 26–40.
30.
FraileMartaIyengarShanto. 2014. “Not All News Sources Are Equally Informative: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Knowledge in Europe.” The International Journal of Press/Politics19 (3): 275–94.
31.
FriedmanSharon H.DunwoodySharonRogersCarol L., eds. 1999. Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. New York: Routledge.
32.
GolanGuy. 2006. “Inter-Media Agenda Setting and Global News Coverage: Assessing the Influence of the New York Times on Three Network Television Evening News Programs.” Journalism Studies7 (2): 323–33.
33.
HakhverdianArmen. 2012. “The Causal Flow between Public Opinion and Policy: Government Responsiveness, Leadership, or Counter Movement?”West European Politics35 (6): 1386–406.
34.
HänggliRegulaKriesiHanspeter. 2010. “Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign.” Political Communication27 (2): 141–57.
35.
IyengarShanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
JenningsWill. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994-2007.” British Journal of Political Science39:847–70.
37.
JeritJenniferBarabasJasonBolsenToby. 2006. “Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 266–82.
38.
JochenPeterJochenEdmundSemetkoHolli A.2004. “Television Coverage of the 1999 European Parliamentary Elections.” Political Communication21:415–33.
39.
KellstedtPaul M.2003. The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
LawrenceRegina G.2000. “Game-Framing the Issues: Tracking the Strategy Frame in Public Policy News.” Political Communication17 (2): 93–114.
41.
LeeNam-JinMcLeodDouglas M.ShahDhavan V.2008. “Framing Policy Debates: Issue Dualism, Journalistic Frames, and Opinions on Controversial Policy Issues.” Communication Research35 (5): 695–718.
42.
LichterS. RobertNoyesRichard. 1995. Good Intentions Make Bad News. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
LupiaArthurMcCubbinsMathew D.1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MonroeAlan D.1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993.” The Public Opinion Quarterly62 (1): 6–28.
45.
NeumanW. RussellJustMarion R.CriglerAnn N.1992. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
PageBenjamin I.ShapiroRobert Y.1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
PattersonThomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.
48.
PopkinSamuelDimockMichael. 1999. “Political Knowledge and Citizen Competence.” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, ed. ElkinStephenSaltonKarol, 117–46. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
49.
SabatoLarry. 1991. Feeding Frenzy. New York: Free Press.
50.
SchudsonMichael. 2003. The Sociology of News. New York: W.W. Norton.
51.
SorokaStuart N.WlezienChristopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
StimsonJames. 1991. Public Opinion in American: Moods Cycles and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.
53.
StockingS. HollyHolsteinLisa W.2009. “Manufacturing Doubt: Journalists’ Roles and the Construction of Ignorance in a Scientific Controversy.” Public Understanding of Science18 (1): 23–42.
54.
UraJoseph DanielEllisChristopher R.2012. “Partisan Moods: Polarization and the Dynamics of Mass Party Preferences.” The Journal of Politics74 (1): 277–91.
55.
VliegenthartRensWalgraveStefaan. 2008. “The Contingency of Intermedia Agenda Setting: A Longitudinal Study in Belgium.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85 (4): 860–77.
56.
WalgraveStefaanVan AelstPeter. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56 (1): 88–109.
57.
WilliamsChristopher J.SchoonveldeMartijn. 2018. “It Takes Three: How Mass Media Coverage Conditions Public Responsiveness to Policy Outputs in the United States.”Social Science Quarterly99 (5): 1627–1636.
58.
WlezienChristopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science39:981–1000.
59.
WlezienChristopherSorokaStuart. 2012. “Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link.” West European Politics35 (6): 1407–32.
60.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
