When exploring the political response of citizens to economic inequality, scholarship primarily focuses on support for left parties and demand for redistribution. This article expands upon this literature by exploring whether inequality generates public support for a known inequality-attenuating force in society—labor unions. In contrast to prior work, which largely focuses on national levels of inequality, we focus on the effect of citizens’ firsthand exposure to inequality in their local context. We theorize that residing in a context with visible income inequality should generate support for expanding the power of unions and should do so by augmenting the perceived exigency of unions in advocating for the working class. Using observational analysis of national survey data, reinforced with matching, placebo tests, and a survey experiment, we find strong support for our theoretical expectations.
AarøeLenePetersenMichael Bang. 2014. “Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues.” The Journal of Politics76 (3): 684–97.
2.
AcemogluDaronAghionPhilippeViolanteGiovanni L.2001. “Deunionization, Technical Change and Inequality.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy55 (1): 229–64.
3.
AndersenRobertTilleyJamesHeathAnthony F.2005. “Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice through the Electoral Cycle.” British Journal of Political Science35 (2): 285–302.
AsherHerbert B.HeberligEric S.RipleyRandall B.SnyderKaren. 2001. American Labor Unions in the Electoral Arena. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
BainGeorge SayersPriceRobert. 1980. Profiles of Union Growth: A Comparative Statistical Portrait of Eight Countries. Warwick Studies in Industrial Relations. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
7.
BambergerPeter A.KlugerAvraham N.SuchardRonena. 1999. “Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-analysis.” Academy of Management Journal42 (3): 304–18.
8.
BartelsLarry M.2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
BashirOmar S.2015. “Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the ‘Oligarchy’ Result.” Research & Politics2 (4): 1–7.
BulmerMartin. 1975. Working-Class Images of Society. London: Routledge.
13.
CampbellAndrea LouiseWongCaraCitrinJack. 2006. “‘Racial Threat,’ Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives.” Political Behavior28 (2): 129–50.
14.
CardDavid. 2001. “The Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality in the US Labor Market.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review54 (2): 296–315.
15.
CarnesNicholas. 2016. “Why Are There So Few Working-Class People in Political Office? Evidence from State Legislatures.” Politics, Groups, and Identities4 (1): 84–109.
16.
ChenEmmeline S.TylerTom R.2001. “Cloaking Power: Legitimizing Myths and the Psychology of the Advantaged.” In The Use and Abuse of Power: Multiple Perspectives on the Causes of Corruption, edited by Lee-ChaiAnnette Y.BarghJohn A., 241–61. New York: Psychology Press.
17.
ChinGilbertCulottaElizabeth. 2014. “What the Numbers Tell Us.” Science344 (6186): 818–21.
18.
ClawsonDanClawsonMary Ann. 1999. “What Has Happened to the US Labor Movement? Union Decline and Renewal.” Annual Review of Sociology25 (January): 95–119.
EdwardsP. K.BainGeorge Sayers. 1988. “Why Are Trade Unions Becoming More Popular? Unions and Public Opinion in Britain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations26 (3): 311–26.
EllisChristopher. 2013. “Social Context and Economic Biases in Representation.” The Journal of Politics75 (3): 773–86. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000376.
24.
FongChristina. 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics82 (2): 225–46.
25.
FranciaPeter. 2006. The Future of Organized Labor in American Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
FrankoWilliam. 2014. “State Context and Perceptions of Growing Economic Inequality.” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 5.
27.
FreemanRichard BarryRogersJoel. 2006. What Workers Want. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
28.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
GilensMartinPageBenjamin I.2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics12 (3): 564–81.
GlasgowGarrett. 2005. “Evidence of Group-Based Economic Voting: NAFTA and Union Households in the 1992 US Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly58 (3): 427–34.
33.
GoldthorpeJohn H.1968. The Affluent Worker: Political Attitudes and Behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
GordonMichael E.PhilpotJohn W.BurtRobert E.ThompsonCynthia A.SpillerWilliam E.1980. “Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates.” Journal of Applied Psychology65 (4): 479–99.
35.
GrangerC. W. J.NewboldP.1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics2:111–20.
36.
Green, EvaG. T.AuerFanja. 2013. “How Social Dominance Orientation Affects Union Participation: The Role of Union Identification and Perceived Union Instrumentality.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology23 (2): 143–56.
37.
GreenstoneJ. David. 1977. Labor in American Politics. 2nd ed.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2011. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
39.
HarthNicole SyringaKesslerThomasLeachColin Wayne. 2008. “Advantaged Group’s Emotional Reactions to Intergroup Inequality: The Dynamics of Pride, Guilt, and Sympathy.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34 (1): 115–29.
40.
HayesThomas J.2014. “Do Citizens Link Attitudes with Preferences? Economic Inequality and Government Spending in the ‘New Gilded Age.’”Social Science Quarterly95:468–85.
41.
IacusStefano M.KingGaryPorroGiuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20 (1): 1–24.
42.
IversenTorbenSoskiceDavid. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review100 (2): 165–81.
43.
JarleyPaulKuruvillaSarosh. 1994. “American Trade Unions and Public Approval: Can Unions Please All of the People All of the Time?”Journal of Labor Research15 (2): 97–116.
44.
JohnstonChristopher D.NewmanBenjamin J.2016. “Economic Inequality and US Public Policy Mood across Space and Time.” American Politics Research44 (1): 164–91.
45.
KellyCarolineKellyJohn. 1994. “Who Gets Involved in Collective Action? Social Psychological Determinants of Individual Participation in Trade Unions.” Human Relations47 (1): 63–88.
46.
KellyNathan J.2005. “Political Choice, Public Policy, and Distributional Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 865–80.
47.
KellyNathan J.EnnsPeter K.2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 855–70.
48.
KenworthyLaneMcCallLeslie. 2008. “Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution.” Socio-Economic Review6 (1): 35–68.
49.
KlandermansBert. 1986. “Psychology and Trade Union Participation: Joining, Acting, Quitting.” Journal of Occupational Psychology59 (3): 189–204.
50.
KluegelJames R.SmithEliot R.1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
51.
KrahnHarveyLoweGraham S.1984a. “Community Influences on Attitudes towards Unions.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society39 (1): 93–113.
52.
KrahnHarveyLoweGraham S.1984b. “Public Attitudes towards Unions: Some Canadian Evidence.” Journal of Labor Research5 (2): 149–64.
53.
LawrenceEric D.SidesJohn. 2014. “The Consequences of Political Innumeracy.” Research & Politics1 (2): 1–8. doi:10.1177/2053168014545414.
54.
LeboMatthew J.WalkerRobert W.ClarkeHarold D.2000. “You Must Remember This: Dealing with Long Memory in Political Analyses.” Electoral Studies19 (1): 31–48.
55.
LeeBarrett A.FarrellChad R.LinkBruce G.2004. “Revisiting the Contact Hypothesis: The Case of Public Exposure to Homelessness.” American Sociological Review69 (1): 40–63.
56.
LeighleyJan E.NaglerJonathan. 2007. “Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the US Electorate, 1964–2004.” The Journal of Politics69 (2): 430–41.
57.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. 1st ed. Garden City: Anchor Books.
58.
LipsetSeymour MartinSchneiderWilliam. 1983. “The Decline of Confidence in American Institutions.” Political Science Quarterly98 (3): 379–402.
59.
LipsetSeymour MartinSchneiderWilliam. 1987. “The Confidence Gap during the Reagan Years, 1981-1987.” Political Science Quarterly102 (1): 1–23.
60.
LoweGraham S.KrahnHarvey. 1989. “Recent Trends in Public Support for Unions in Canada.” Journal of Labor Research10 (4): 391–410.
61.
MartinezArthur D.FioritoJack. 2009. “General Feelings toward Unions and Employers as Predictors of Union Voting Intent.” Journal of Labor Research30 (2): 120–34.
62.
McCallLeslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
McCallLeslieKenworthyLane. 2009. “Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics7 (3): 459–84.
64.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
65.
MeltzerAllan H.RichardScott F.1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Tepper School of Business, October. http://repository.cmu.edu/tepper/750.
66.
MinchinTimothy J.2006. Fighting Against the Odds: A History of Southern Labor since World War II. 1st ed. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
67.
MinkoffScott L.LyonsJeffrey. 2016. “Living with Inequality: The Attitudinal Effects of Exposure to Income Diversity in Urban America.” Paper prepared for the 2016 Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 7.
NewmanBenjamin J.2014. “My Poor Friend: Financial Distress in One’s Social Network, the Perceived Power of the Rich, and Support for Redistribution.” The Journal of Politics76 (1): 126–38.
70.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnstonChristopher D.LownPatrick L.2015. “False Consciousness or Class Awareness? Local Income Inequality, Personal Economic Position, and Belief in American Meritocracy.” American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 326–40.
71.
NewmanBenjamin J.VelezYamilHartmanTodd K.BankertAlexa. 2015. “Are Citizens ‘Receiving the Treatment’? Assessing a Key Link in Contextual Theories of Public Opinion and Political Behavior.” Political Psychology36 (1): 123–31.
72.
OliverJ. EricWongJanelle. 2003. “Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings.” American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 567–82.
73.
PanagopoulosCostasFranciaPeter L.2008. “The Polls—Trends Labor Unions in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (1): 134–59.
74.
RaineyCarlisle. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 1083–91.
RigbyElizabethWrightGerald C.2011. “Whose Statehouse Democracy? Policy Responsiveness to Poor versus Rich Constituents in Poor versus Rich States.” In Who Gets Represented? edited by EnnsPeter K.WlezienChristopher, 189–222. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
77.
RigbyElizabethWrightGerald C.2013. “Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 552–65. doi:10.1111/ajps.12007.
78.
RosenfeldJake. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
79.
RouxAna V. DiezMerkinSharon SteinArnettDonnaChamblessLloydMassingMarkNietoF. JavierSorliePaulSzkloMoysesTyrolerHerman A.WatsonRobert L.2001. “Neighborhood of Residence and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease.” New England Journal of Medicine345 (2): 99–106.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
82.
SchmidtDiane E.1993. “Public Opinion and Media Coverage of Labor Unions.” Journal of Labor Research14 (2): 151–64.
83.
SchulmanMichael D.ZingraffRhondaReifLinda. 1985. “Race, Gender, Class Consciousness and Union Support: An Analysis of Southern Textile Workers.” Sociological Quarterly26 (2): 187–204.
84.
ShalevMichael. 1983. “Strikes and the Crisis: Industrial Conflict and Unemployment in the Western Nations.” Economic and Industrial Democracy4 (4): 417–60.
85.
SoltFrederickHuYueHudsonKevanSongJungminYuDong “Erico”. 2017. “Economic Inequality and Class Consciousness.” The Journal of Politics79:1079–83.
86.
Van De VallM.1963. De Vakbeweging in Een Wehaartsstaat [The Trade Movement in Wehaartsstaat]. Meppel: Boom.
87.
VelezYamilWongGrace. 2017. “Assessing Contextual Measurement Strategies.” The Journal of Politics79:1084–89.
88.
VolschoThomas W.KellyNathan J.2012. “The Rise of the Super-Rich Power Resources, Taxes, Financial Markets, and the Dynamics of the Top 1 Percent, 1949 to 2008.” American Sociological Review77 (5): 679–99.
89.
WatsonTara. 2009. “Inequality and the Measurement of Residential Segregation by Income in American Neighborhoods.” Review of Income and Wealth55 (3): 820–44.
90.
WesternBruceRosenfeldJake. 2011. “Unions, Norms, and the Rise in US Wage Inequality.” American Sociological Review76 (4): 513–37.
91.
WilkinsonR. G.1997. “Socioeconomic Determinants of Health. Health Inequalities: Relative or Absolute Material Standards?”British Medical Journal314 (7080): 591–95.
92.
WintersJeffrey A.PageBenjamin I.2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?”Perspectives on Politics7 (4): 731–51.
93.
XuPingGarandJames C.2010. “Economic Context and Americans’ Perceptions of Income Inequality.” Social Science Quarterly91 (5): 1220–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
