This paper proposes to investigate the influence of legislative quotas on gender differences in political participation by analyzing the within- and across-country effects of quotas. Gender quotas can signal to women that their presence in politics is welcome, leading to a subsequent increase in their involvement in political activities. This change in political behavior should not be reproduced in men; thus, when gender quotas are present, the gap between men’s and women’s participation narrows. Using the European Values Survey and data from eighteen European democracies, this paper demonstrates that this indeed occurs for some political activities when gender gaps are compared before and after the introduction of quotas within countries. This result, however, is not replicated for across-country analyses. European countries without legislative gender quotas tend to have smaller gender gaps than countries with them. This result is explained by referring to the context of the adoption of gender quotas.
BarnesTiffany D.BurchardStephanie M.2013. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies46:767–90.
2.
BeamanLoriCironeAlexandraDufloEstherPandeRohini. 2012. “Politics as a Male Domain and Empowerment in India.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, edited by FranceschetSusanKrookMena LenaPiscopoJennifer M., 208–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BeauregardKatrine. 2014. “Gender, Political Participation and Electoral Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research53:617–34.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1:97–125.
6.
BroockmanDavid E.2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies34:190–204.
7.
BurnsNancy. 2007. “Gender in the Aggregate, Gender in the Individual, Gender and Political Action.” Politics & Gender3:104–24.
8.
BurnsNancySchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9.
CareyJohn M.HixSimon. 2011. “The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science55:383–97.
10.
CaulMiki. 1999. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics5:79–98.
11.
CaulMiki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis.” The Journal of Politics63:1214–29.
12.
ChildsSarahWitheyJulie. 2004. “Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament.” Political Studies52:552–64.
13.
ClaytonAmanda. 2015. “Women’s Political Engagement under Quota-Mandated Female Representation: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment.” Comparative Political Studies48:333–69.
14.
CofféHildeBolzendahlCatherine. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles62:318–33.
15.
DahlerupDrude. 2006. Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: Routledge.
16.
DahlerupDrudeFreidenvallLenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Trak’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics7:26–48.
17.
DesposatoScottNorranderBarbara. 2009. “The Gender Gap in Latin America: Contextual and Individual Influences on Gender and Political Participation.” British Journal of Political Science39:141–62.
18.
FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer M.2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GallagherMichaelMitchellPaul. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GilardiFabrizio. 2015. “The Temporary Importance of Role Model for Women’s Political Representation.” American Journal of Political Science59:957–70.
21.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KamCindy D.FranzeseRobert J.Jr.2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
KarpJeffrey A.BanducciSusan A.2008. “When Politics Is Not Just a Man’s Game: Women’s Representation and Political Engagement.” Electoral Studies27:105–15.
24.
KathleneLyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.” The Journal of Politics57:696–723.
25.
KittilsonMiki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender1:638–44.
26.
KittilsonMiki CaulSchwindt-BayerLeslie A.2012. The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KrookMona Lena. 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research46:367–94.
29.
KrookMona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KrookMona LenaLovenduskiJoniSquiresJudith. 2009. “Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship.” British Journal of Political Science39:781–803.
31.
KudvaNeema. 2003. “Engineering Elections: The Experiences of Women in Panchayati Raj in Karnataka, India.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society16:445–63.
MatlandRichard E.StudlarDonley T.1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral System: Canada and Norway.” The Journal of Politics58:707–34.
34.
MeierPetra. 2012. “Paradoxes in the Meanings of Quotas in Belgium.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, edited by FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer M., 157–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
MurrayRainbow. 2012. “Parity in France: A ‘Dual Track’ Solution to Women’s Under-representation.” West European Politics35:343–61.
36.
NorrisPippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
NorrisPippaFranklinMark N.1997. “Social Representation.” European Journal of Political Research32:185–210.
38.
OpelloKathrine A. R.2006. Gender Quotas, Parity Reform and Political Parties in France. Lanham: Lexington Books.
39.
PitkinHanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
Quota Project. 2016. “Global Database of Quotas for Women.” The International IDEA, Inter-Parliamentary Union and Stockholm University. http://www.quotaproject.org.
41.
Rabe-HeskethSkrondalAnders. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
42.
Saint-GermainMichelle A.1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona State Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly70:956–68.
43.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science50:570–85.
44.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34:5–28.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.MishlerWilliam. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics67:407–28.
47.
ShorBorisBafumiJosephKeeleLukeParkDavid. 2007. “A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” Political Analysis15:165–81.
48.
SteenbergenMarco R.JonesBradford S.2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46:218–37.
49.
StolleDietlindHoogheMarc. 2011. “Shifting Inequalities: Patterns of Exclusion and Inclusion in Emerging Forms of Political Participation.” European Societies13:119–42.
50.
StolleDietlindHoogheMarcMichelettiMichele. 2005. “Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Forum of Political Participation.” International Political Science Review26:245–69.
51.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
52.
Taylor-RobinsonMichelleHeathRoseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics24:77–101.
53.
TrippAili MariKangAlice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legis-lative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies41:338–61.
54.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
55.
VergeTania. 2012. “Institutionalising Gender Equality in Spain: From Party Quotas to Electoral Gender Quotas.” West European Politics35:395–414.
56.
ZetterbergPar. 2009. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly62:715–30.
57.
ZetterbergPar. 2012. “Political Engagement and Democratic Legitimacy in Mexico.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, edited by FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer M., 173–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
