Nowadays, we can distinguish gender quotas targeting the political, the social and the economic spheres of society. Taking the Belgian case as an example, this article examines to what extent these different generations or groups of gender quotas differ intrinsically from each other. To this end, it analyses five generic gender quota laws adopted in the period 1990–2011 and the rationales underlying them. The analysis shows that the rules and underlying rationales do not differ fundamentally across the different spheres of society and that existing differences can mainly be explained by a factor of time.
AhernKenneth R.DittmarAmy K. (2011) The changing of the boards: The impact of firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics127(1): 137–197.
2.
AraújoClaraGarcíaAna Isabel (2006) Latin America. The experience and the impact of quotas in Latin America. In: DahlerupDrude (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge, 83–111.
3.
ArmstrongJoWalbySylvia (2012) Gender Quotas in Management Boards. Brussels: European Parliament Directorate-General for Internal Affairs.
4.
BacchiCarol (2006) Arguing for and against quotas: Theoretical issues. In: DahlerupDrude (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge, 32–51.
5.
BrammerStephenMillingtonAndrewPavelinStephen (2007) Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review15(2): 393–403.
6.
CaseyCatherineSkibnesRenatePringleJudith K. (2010) Gender equality and corporate governance: Policy strategies in Norway and New Zealand. Gender, Work and Organization18(6): 613–630.
7.
ChildsSarahKrookMona Lena (2012) Labels and mandates in the United Kingdom. In: FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer F. (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 89–102.
8.
DahlerupDrude (ed.) (2006) Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge.
9.
DahlerupDrude (2012). Preface. In: FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer F. (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, vii–viii.
10.
Dale-OlsenHaraldSchonePalVernerMette (2012) Women on boards of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Denmark and Norway. Comparative Social Research29: 211–234.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer (2008) Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender4(3): 393–425.
13.
FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer (eds) (2012) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
HolliAnne Maria (2011a) Female bodies or women’s interest representation? An analysis of women’s representation in Finnish policy preparatory institutions. Paper presented in Panel 7: ‘Institutional Design Change and Transformation’, 2nd European Conference on Gender and Politics, Budapest, January 13–15.
15.
HolliAnne Maria (2011b) Transforming local politics? The impact of gender quotas in Finland. In: PiniBarbaraMcDonaldPaula (eds) Women and Representation in Local Government. International Case Studies. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 142–158.
16.
HolliAnne MariaLuhtakallioEevaRaevaaraEeva (2006) Quota trouble. Talking about gender quotas in Finnish local politics. International Feminist Journal of Politics8(2): 169–193.
17.
HtunMalaJonesMark (2002) Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In: CraskeNikkiMolyneuxMaxime (eds) Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 32–56.
18.
JonesMark (2004) Quota legislation and the election of women: Learning from the Costa Rican experience. The Journal of Politics66(4): 1203–1233.
19.
JonesMark (2009) Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women. Evidence from the Latin American vanguard. Comparative Political Studies42(1): 56–81.
20.
KittilsonMikki Caul (2006) Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
21.
KrookMona Lena (2009) Quotas for Women in Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
LarsonAnna (2012) Collective identities, institutions, security, and state building in Afghanistan. In: FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer F. (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 136–153.
23.
LongmanTimothy (2006) Rwanda: Achieving equality or serving an authoritarian state? In: BauerGretchenBrittonHannah E. (eds) Women in African Parliaments. Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 133–150.
24.
LovenduskiJoni (ed.) (2005) State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
MatlandRichard (2006) Electoral quotas: Frequency and effectiveness. In: DahlerupDrude (ed.) Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge, 275–292.
26.
MeierPetra (2004) De kracht van de definitie: een vergelijking van de quotawetten in Argentinië, België en Frankrijk. Res Publica46(1): 80–100.
27.
MiguelLuis Felipe (2012) Policy priorities and women’s double bind in Brazil. In: FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer F. (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 103–118.
28.
PhillipsAnne (1995) The Politics of Presence. The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity and Race. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
SchmidtGregory D.SaundersKyle L. (2004) Effective quotas, relative party magnitude, and the success of female candidates: Peruvian municipal elections in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies37(6): 704–724.
30.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie (2009) Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(1): 5–28.
31.
SliwaSandraMeierPetraThijssenPeter (2011) De impact van party magnitude op het aantal vrouwelijke verkozenen. Gender quota in België kritisch bekeken. Res Publica53(2): 141–165.
32.
StorvikAagoth E.TeigenMari (2010) Women on Board. The Norwegian Experience. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
33.
TeigenMari (2012a) Gender quotas for corporate boards in Norway – innovative gender equality policy. In: FaganColetteMenendezMaria GonzalezAnsonSilvia Gomez (eds) Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management: European Trends and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 70–90.
34.
TeigenMari (2012b) Gender quotas in corporate boards – on the diffusion of a distinct national policy reform. Comparative Social Research29: 115–146.
35.
TremblayManon (ed.) (2012) Women and Legislative Representation. Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas (2nd updated and revised edn). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
TrippAili M.KangAlice (2008) The global impact of quotas. On the fast track to increased female representation. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 338–361.
37.
ZetterbergPär (2008) The downside of gender quotas? Institutional constraints on women in Mexican state legislatures. Parliamentary Affairs61(3): 442–460.
