For candidates and voters alike, U.S. politics is a gendered space in which women are often underrepresented. Participation from women is assumed to equalize representation and voice in the political process; however, little research has explored gender influence on campaign agendas, particularly in non-news contexts. This study applies a quantitative content analysis to explore the influence of (1) candidate gender, (2) journalist gender, and (3) voter gender on the presidential debate agenda. In examining the issue focus of debate questions, we find that participation from women candidates and women journalists does little to improve agenda diversity and that the agendas set by women journalists fail to satisfy the issue priorities of women voters participating in these same debates.
AdaySeanDevittJames. 2001. “Style over Substance: Newspaper Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Presidential Bid.” International Journal of Press/Politics6 (2): 52–73.
2.
ArmstrongCory L.2004. “The Influence of Reporter Gender on Source Selection in Newspaper Stories.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81:139–54.
3.
ArnoldR. Douglas. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage.
4.
BaitingerGail. 2015. “Meet the Press or Meet the Men? Examining Women’s Presence in American News Media.” Political Research Quarterly68(3):579-592.
5.
BenoitWilliam L.HansenGlenn J.2001. “Presidential Debate Questions and the Public Agenda.” Communication Quarterly49(2):130–41.
6.
BergenLori. 1991. “Testing the Relative Strength of Individual and Organizational Characteristics in Predicting Content of Journalists’ Best Work.” PhD diss., Indiana University, Bloomington.
7.
BreedWarren. 1955. “Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis.” Social Forces33:326–35.
8.
CarlinDiana B.MorrisEricSmithShawna. 2001. “The Influence of Format and Questions on Candidates’ Argument Choices in the 2000 Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist44:2196–18.
9.
CarrollSusan J.SchreiberRonnee. 1997. “Media Coverage of Women in the 103rd Congress.” In Women, Media, and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 131–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
ClaymanSteven E.ElliottMarc N.HeritageJohnBeckettMegan K.2012. “The President’s Questioners: Consequential Attributes of the White House Press Corps.” International Journal of Press/Politics17(1):100–21.
11.
DolanKathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?” Political Research Quarterly67(1):96–107.
12.
DunawayJohanna. 2008. “Markets, Ownership, and the Quality of Campaign News Coverage.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1193–202.
13.
DunawayJohannaLawrenceRegina G.RoseMelodyWeberChristopher R.2013. “Traits versus Issues: How Female Candidates Shape Coverage of Senate and Gubernatorial Races.” Political Research Quarterly66 (3): 715–26.
14.
DunawayJohannaSteinRobert M.2013. “Campaign News Coverage and Early Voting.” Political Communication30 (2): 278–96.
15.
EaglyAlice H.1987. “Reporting Sex Differences.” American Psychologist, 42(7): 756-757.
16.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109(3): 573-598.
17.
EdlundLenaPandeRohini. 2002. “Why Have Women Become Left-wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics117(3):917–61.
18.
EvelandWilliam P.McLeodDouglas M.NathansonAmy I.1994. “Reporters vs. Undecided Voters: An Analysis of the Questions Asked During the 1992 Presidential Debates.” Communication Quarterly42 (4): 390–406.
19.
FallowsJames. 1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Vintage.
20.
FunkhauserG. Ray. 1973. “The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study in the Dynamics of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly37 (1): 62–75.
GansHerbert J.1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
23.
GidengilElisabethEverittJoanna. 2003. “Conventional Coverage/Unconventional Politicians: Gender and Media Coverage of Canadian Leaders’ Debates, 1993, 1997, 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science36(3): 559-557.
24.
GrabeMaria E.SamsonLeilaZelenkauskaiteAstaYegiyanNarine S.2011. “Covering Presidential Election Campaigns: Does Reporter Gender Affect the Work Lives of Correspondents and Their Reportage?” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media55(3):285–306.
25.
HartRoderick P.JarvisSharon E.1997. “Political Debate: Forms, Styles, and Media.” American Behavioral Scientist40(8):1095–122.
26.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46:503–25.
27.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review21 (4): 441–63.
28.
IyengarShantoValentinoNicholas A.AnsolabehereStephenSimonAdam F.1997. “Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Women’s Campaigns.” In Women, Media and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 77–97. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Jackson-BeeckMarilynMeadowRobert G.1979. “The Triple Agenda of Presidential Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly43 (2): 173–80.
30.
JustMarion R.CriglerAnn N.AlgerDean E.CookTimothy E.KernMontagueWestDarrell M.1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
KahnKim F.1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
KaidLynda L.2006. “Political Advertising in the United States.” In The SAGE Handbook of Political Advertising, edited by KaidLynda L.Holtz-BachaChristina, 37–61. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
33.
KaidLynda L.McKinneyMitchell S.TedescoJohn C.2000. Civic Dialogue in the 1996 Presidential Campaign: Candidates, Media, and Public Voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
KaufmannKaren M.PetrocikJohn R.1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science43 (3): 864–87.
35.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
36.
LangGladys E.LangKurt. 1978. “Immediate and Delayed Responses to a Carter-Ford Debate: Assessing Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly42 (3): 322–41.
37.
LawrenceRegina G.2013. “Do the Media Give Women Candidates a Fair Shake?” In New Directions in Media and Politics, edited by RidoutTravis, 132–40. New York: Routledge.
38.
LieblerCarol M.SmithSusan J.1997. “Tracking Gender Differences: A Comparative Analysis of Network Correspondents and their Sources.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media41:58–68.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.1972. “The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36 (2): 176–87.
41.
McKinneyMitchell S.2005. “Let the People Speak: The Public’s Agenda and Presidential Town Hall Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist49 (2): 198–212.
42.
MeeksLindsey. 2012. “Is She ‘Man Enough?’ Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage.” Journal of Communication62:175–93.
43.
MeeksLindsey. 2013. “He Wrote, She Wrote: Journalist Gender, Political Office, and Campaign News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90 (1): 58–74.
44.
MillsKay. 1997. “What Difference Do Women Journalists Make?” In Women, Media, and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 131–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
OttoJean. 1993. “A Matter of Opinion.” Media Studies Journal7 (1–2): 159–63.
46.
PattersonThomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
SapiroVirginia. 1981. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology3 (1): 61–83.
49.
SchroederAlan. 2000. “Media Sponsorship of the 2000 Primary Debates.” International Journal of Press/Politics5 (4): 104–11.
50.
ShehataAdamStrombackJesper. 2013. “Not (Yet) a New Era of Minimal Effects: A Study of Agenda Setting at the Aggregate and Individual Levels.” International Journal of Press/Politics18 (2): 234–55.
51.
SigelmanLee. 1973. “Reporting the News: An Organizational Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology79:132–51.
52.
SonYoung J.WeaverDavid H.2005. “Another Look at What Moves Public Opinion: Media Agenda Setting and Polls in the 2000 U.S. Election.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research18 (2): 174–95.
53.
Stromer-GalleyJenniferBryantLauren. 2011. “Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates.” Communication Quarterly59 (5): 529–46.
54.
SwersMicheleLarsonCarin. 2005. “Women and Congress: Do They Act as Advocates for Women’s Issues?” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, edited by ThomasSueWilcoxClyde, 110-128. New York: Oxford University Press.
TraisterRebecca. 2010. Big Girls Don’t Cry: The Election that Changed Everything for American Women. New York: Free Press.
57.
TurcotteJason. 2014. “Debates and the Disincentives of Democracy: How News Norms and Values Influence Moderator Agendas.” Journalism Practice8 (6): 772–88.
WeaverDavid H.1997. “Women as Journalists.” In Women, Media, and Politics, edited by NorrisPippa, 21–40. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
WeaverDavid H.WilhoitCleveland. 1996. The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
WelchSusanHibbingJohn. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics54 (1): 197–213.
62.
ZeldesGeri A.FicoFrederick. 2005. “Race and Gender: An Analysis of Sources and Reporters in the Networks’ Coverage of the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” Mass Communication and Society8 (4): 373–85.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
