Do female executives exercise the authority of their office distinctly from their male counterparts? Anecdotal evidence suggests women legislators are likely to govern in a more consensual manner than men. Yet there has been little systematic research extending such claims to women in executive office. Using an original data set, we evaluate one aspect of policy agenda setting—rates of executive decree issuance—among four male–female pairs of Latin American presidents between 2000 and 2014. Female presidents are generally less prone to rule by decree, but this relationship is conditioned by presidential popularity. Female executives with high presidential approval ratings are less likely to rule via unilateral action than similarly popular male executives, but the gendered differences in decree issuance disappear when executives possess low approval ratings. Our findings have implications for understanding the potential benefits of feminine leadership styles for executive–legislative relations and good governance.
AdamsMelinda. 2008. “Liberia’s Election of Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and Women’s Executive Leadership in Africa.” Politics & Gender4 (3): 475–84.
2.
AlemánEduardoTsebelisGeorge. 2005. “The Origins of Presidential Conditional Agenda-Setting Power in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review40 (2): 3–26.
3.
AlexanderDeborahAndersenKristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 527–45.
4.
BaldezLisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Adoption of Gender Quota Laws for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (2): 231–58.
5.
BarnesTiffany D.2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BianchiAlvaroBragaRuy. 2005. “Brazil: The Lula Government and Financial Globalization.” Social Forces83 (4): 1745–62.
7.
BoltonAlexanderThrowerSharece. 2016. “Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism.” American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 649–63.
8.
BondJon R.FleisherRichard. 2001. “The Polls: Partisanship and Presidential Performance Evaluations.” Presidential Studies Quarterly31 (3): 529–40.
9.
BrattonKathleenRayLeonard. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 428–37.
10.
CalvoErnesto. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Law Making in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science37 (2): 263–80.
11.
Canes-WroneBrandice. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DeeringChristopher J.MaltzmanForrest. 1999. “The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power.” Political Research Quarterly52:767–83.
17.
EaglyAlice H.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.. 2001. “The Leadership Styles of Women and Men.” Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 781–97.
18.
EaglyAlice H.JohnsonBlair T.. 1990. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin108 (2): 233–56.
19.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109 (3): 573–98.
20.
EdwardsGeorge C.III. 2009. The Strategic President: Persuasion and Opportunity in Presidential Leadership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
EpsteinDavidO’HalloranSharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transactions Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Escobar-LemmonMariaTaylor-RobinsonMichelle M.. 2005. “Women Ministers in Latin American Government: When, Where, and Why?” American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 829–44.
23.
Escobar-LemmonMariaTaylor-RobinsonMichelle M.. 2016. Women in Presidential Cabinets: Power Players or Abundant Tokens?New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Eshbaugh-SohaMatthewPeakeJeffrey S.. 2011. Breaking through the Noise: Presidential Leadership, Public Opinion, and the News Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
25.
EspinalRosarioZhaoShanyang. 2015. “Gender Gaps in Civic and Political Participation in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society57 (1): 123–38.
26.
FunkKendall D.2015. “Gendered Governing? Women’s Leadership Styles and Participatory Institutions in Brazil.” Political Research Quarterly68 (3): 564–78.
27.
GerrityJessica C.OsbornTracyMendezJeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?” Politics & Gender3 (2): 179–200.
28.
HeilmanMadeline E.2001. “Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women’s Ascent up the Organizational Ladder.” Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 657–74.
29.
HeinemannAlessandraVernerDorte. 2006. “Crime and Violence in Development: A Literature Review of Latin America and the Caribbean.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 4041. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
HintonNicoleMoseleyMasonSmithAmy Erica. 2012. “Equality of Political Participation in the Americas.” In The Political Culture of Democracy in the Americas, 2012: Toward Equality of Opportunity, edited by SeligsonMitchell A.SmithAmy EricaZechmeisterElizabeth J., 47–86. Nashville: Americas Barometer, Latin American Public Opinion Project, Vanderbilt University.
31.
HolmanMirya R.2016. “Gender, Political Rhetoric, and Moral Metaphors in State of the City Addresses.” Urban Affairs Review52 (4): 501–30.
32.
HowellWilliam G.2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
HtunMala N.JonesMark P.. 2001. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision Making: Electoral Quotas and Women’s Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender, Rights and Justice in Latin America, edited by CraskeNikkiMolyneauxMaxine, 32–56. New York: Macmillan.
34.
HuberEvelyne. 2009. “Politics and Inequality in Latin America.” PS: Political Science & Politics42 (4): 651–55.
35.
JalalzaiFarida. 2013. Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
JalalzaiFarida. 2016. Women Presidents of Latin America: Beyond Family Ties?New York: Routledge.
37.
JohnsonStefanie K.MurphySusan ElaineZewdieSelamawitReichardRebecca J.. 2008. “The Strong, Sensitive Type: Effects of Gender Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes on the Evaluation of Male and Female Leaders.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes106 (1): 39–60.
38.
JonesMark P.SaieghSebastianSpillerPablo T.TommasiMariano. 2002. “Amateur Legislators-Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science46:656–69.
39.
KarpowitzChristopher F.MendelbergTaliShakerLee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review106 (3): 533–47.
40.
KathleneLyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 560–76.
41.
KittilsonMiki. 2008. “Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Politics70 (2): 323–34.
42.
KochMichael T.FultonSarah A.. 2011. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies.” Journal of Politics73 (1): 1–16.
43.
KrookMona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender2:303–27.
44.
KrookMona LenaO’BrienDiana Z.. 2012. “All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics74 (3): 840–55.
45.
MayerKenneth R.1999. “Executive Orders and Presidential Power.” Journal of Politics61 (2): 445–66.
46.
MoeTerry M.HowellWilliam G.. 1999. “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory.” Presidential Studies Quarterly29 (4): 850–72.
47.
MorganJanaBuiceMelissa. 2013. “Latin American Attitudes toward Women in Politics: The Influence of Elite Cues, Female Advancement, and Individual Characteristics.” American Political Science Review107 (4): 644–62.
48.
MorgensternScottPolga-HecimovichJohnShair-RosenfieldSarah. 2013. “Tall, Grande or Venti: Presidential Powers in the United States and Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America5:37–70.
49.
NegrettoGabriel. 2004. “Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies37:531–62.
50.
PereiraCarlosPowerTimothy J.RennóLucio. 2005. “Under What Conditions Do Presidents Resort to Decree Power? Theory and Evidence from the Brazilian Case.” Journal of Politics67:178–200.
51.
PowellGary N.ButterfieldD. AnthonyParentJane D.. 2002. “Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed?”Journal of Management28 (2): 177–93.
52.
Reyes-HousholderCatherine. 2016. “Presidentas Rise: Consequences for Women in Cabinets?” Latin American Politics and Society58 (3): 3–25.
53.
RoehrigTerence. 2009. “Executive Leadership and the Continuing Quest for Justice in Argentina.” Human Rights Quarterly31:721–47.
54.
RosenthalCindy. 2000. “Gender Styles in State Legislative Committees: Raising Their Voices in Resolving Conflict.” Women & Politics21 (2): 21–45.
55.
RudmanLaurie A.PhelanJulie E.. 2008. “Backlash Effects for Disconfirming Gender Stereotypes in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior28:61–79.
56.
ScheinVirginia E.2001. “A Global Look at Psychological Barriers to Women’s Progress in Management.” Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 675–88.
57.
Shair-RosenfieldSarahStoyanAlissandra T.. 2017. “Constraining Executive Action: The Role of Legislator Professionalization in Latin America.” Governance30 (2): 301–19.
58.
Shair-RosenfieldSarahWoodReed M.. 2017. “Governing Well After War: How Improving Female Representation Prolongs Post Conflict Peace.” Journal of Politics79 (3): 995–1009.
59.
ShugartMatthew S.MainwaringScott. 1997. “Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, edited by MainwaringScottShugartMatthew S., 12–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
ThomasGwynnAdamsMelinda. 2010. “Breaking the Final Glass Ceiling: The Influence of Gender in the Elections of Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and Michelle Bachelet.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy31:105–31.
61.
TobarMarcela Ríos. 2008. “Seizing a Window of Opportunity: The Election of President Bachelet in Chile.” Politics & Gender4 (3): 509–19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
