Leading opinion research on immigration has begun to move from size-based to change-based measures of citizens’ ethnic context. This shift is based on the theoretical assumption that over-time growth in immigrant populations is more likely to capture citizens’ attention than their current size. At present, there is no empirical evidence supporting this assumption. This article demonstrates that while the size of local immigrant populations exerts virtually no effect on perceived immigration, over-time growth strongly influences citizens’ perceptions of immigration into their community. In addition, our analyses illuminate the differential contribution of growth in local Hispanic and Asian populations to perceived immigration.
AlexseevMikhail A.2006. “Ballot-box Vigilantism? Ethnic Population Shifts and Xenophobic Voting in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Behavior28 (3): 211–40.
2.
BlalockHerbert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations. New York: Wiley.
3.
BraderTedValentinoNicholas A.SuhayElizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–78.
4.
BradyHenry E.SnidermanPaul M.1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review79 (4): 1061–78.
5.
BurnsPeterGimpelJames G.2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly115(2): 201-25.
6.
CainBruceCitrinJackWongCara. 2000. Ethnic Context, Race Relations, and California Politics. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
7.
CampbellAndrea L.WongCaraCitrinJack. 2006. “Racial Threat, Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives.” Political Behavior28(2): 129-50.
8.
ChavezLeo R.2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
CitrinJackReingoldBethWaltersEvelynGreenDonald P.1990. “The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States.” Western Political Quarterly43 (3): 535–59.
10.
CitrinJackGreenDonald P.MusteChristopherWongCara. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics59(3): 858-81.
11.
ClarkWilliam A.V.1992. “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context.” Demography29(3): 451-66
12.
CrowderKyleHallMatthewTolnayStewart E.2011. “Neighborhood Immigration and Native Out-migration.” American Sociological Review76 (1): 25–47.
13.
DixonJeffrey C.RosenbaumMichael C.2004. “Nice to Know You? Testing Contact, Cultural, and Group Threat Theories of Anti-Black and Anti-Hispanic Stereotypes.” Social Science Quarterly85(2): 257-80.
14.
FetzerJoel S.2000. Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FoxCybelle. 2004. “The Changing Color of Welfare: How Whites’ Attitudes toward Latinos Influence Support for Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology110(3): 580-625.
16.
FrendreisJohnTatalovichRaymond. 1997. “Who Supports English-Only Laws? Evidence from the 1992 National Election Study.” Social Science Quarterly78(2): 354-68.
17.
GreenDonald P.StrolovitchDara Z.WongJanelle S.1998. “Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology104 (2): 372–403.
18.
HaShang E.2010. “The Consequences of Multiracial Contexts on Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly63 (1): 29–42.
19.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.2014. “Voter Attitudes Toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science. Forthcoming.
20.
HoodM. V.MorrisIrwin L.1997. “Amigo o enemigo? Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly78 (2): 7813–19.
21.
HoodM. V.MorrisIrwin L.2000. “Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187.” Social Science Quarterly81(1): 194-206.
22.
HopkinsDaniel J.2009. “The Diversity Discount: When Increasing Ethnic and Racial Diversity Prevents Tax Increases.” Journal of Politics71 (1): 160–77.
23.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–60.
24.
HortonJohn. 1995. The Politics of Diversity: Immigration, Resistance, Change in Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
25.
HuntingtonSamuel P.2004. “The Hispanic Challenge.” Foreign Policy141:30–45.
26.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47 (2): 263–92.
27.
KeyV.O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
28.
KimClaire J.1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society27 (1): 105–58.
29.
KingGaryHonakerJamesJosephAnneScheveKenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 49–69.
30.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 341–55.
31.
NewmanBenjamin J.2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science57(2): 374-90.
32.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnsonJoshua. 2012. “Ethnic Change, Concern over Immigration, and Approval of State Government.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly12(4): 415-37.
33.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnstonChristopher D.StricklandApril A.CitrinJack. 2012. “Immigration Crackdown in the American Workplace: Explaining Variation in E-Verify Adoption across the U.S. States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly12 (2): 160–82.
34.
OliverJ. EricWongJanelle. 2003. “Intergroup Prejudice in a Multiethnic Setting.” American Journal of Political Science44(3): 574-89.
35.
PasselJeffrey S.CohnD’VeraLopezMark Hugo. 2011. Hispanics Account for More than Half of Nations’ Growth in Past Decade: Census 2010: 50 Million Latinos. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center Report.
36.
RiederJonathan. 1985. Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn against liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
RozinPaulRoyzmanEdward B.2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review5 (4): 296–320.
38.
SamDavid L.BerryJohn W.2010. “Acculturation: When Individuals and Groups of Different Cultural Backgrounds Meet.” Perspectives on Psychological Science5(4): 472-81.
39.
SteinRobert M.PostStephanie ShirleyRindenAllison L.2000. “Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes.” Political Research Quarterly53(2): 285-303.
40.
SuttlesGerald D.1972. The Social Construction of Communities. Vol. 111. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
TaylorMarylee C.1998. “How White Attitudes Vary with the Racial Composition of Local Populations: Numbers Count.” American Sociological Review63: 512-35.
42.
TolbertCaroline JGrummelJohn A.2003. “White Voter Support for California’s Proposition 209: Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly3(2): 183-92.
43.
ValentinoNicholas A.BraderTedJardinaAshley E.2013. “Immigration Opposition among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Attitudes About Latinos?” Political Psychology34(2): 149-66.
44.
WongCara J.2007. “‘Little’ and ‘Big’ Pictures in Our Heads: Race, Local Context, and Innumeracy about Racial Groups in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly71(3): 392-412.
45.
WongCara J.BowersJakeWilliamsTarahSimmonsKatherine Drake. 2012. “Bringing the Person Back In: Boundaries, Perceptions, and the Measurement of Racial Context.” Journal of Politics1 (1): 1–18.
