This article presents the first systematic analysis of support for democracy in the Islamic Republic of Iran and contributes to the scholarly literature on popular views of democracy in an authoritarian regime. It reaches three main findings. First, religiosity is strongly and negatively related with support for democracy. Second, education and age indirectly affect support for democracy; their effects are mediated through satisfaction with regime performance. Third, greater dissatisfaction with the regime strongly correlates with greater demands for democratization. The data come from a survey conducted in Tehran in 2008 and the 2005 Iranian World Values Survey.
AnsariAli M.2000. Iran, Islam and democracy: The politics of managing change. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
5.
AzimiFakhreddin. 2008. The quest for democracy in Iran: A century of struggle against authoritarian rule. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BrattonMichaelMattesRobert. 2001. Support for democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or instrumental?British Journal of Political Science31:447-74.
7.
BrattonMichaelMattesRobert B.Gyimah-BoadiEmmanuel. 2005. Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrumbergDaniel. 2001. Reinventing Khomeini: The struggle for reform in Iran. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BuisMaarten L.2010. Direct and indirect effects in a logit model. Stata Journal10:11-29.
10.
CanacheDamarysMondakJeffery J.SeligsonMitchell A.2001. Meaning and measuring in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly65:506-28.
11.
ChenJieZhongYangHillardJan William. 1997. The levels and sources of popular support for China’s current political regime. Communist and Post-Communist Studies30:45-64.
12.
De La OAna L.RoddenJonathan A.2008. Does religion distract the poor? Income and issue voting around the world. Comparative Political Studies41:437-76.
13.
EvansGeoffreyWhitefieldStephen. 1995. The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science25:485-514.
14.
FailsMatthew D.PierceHeather Nicole. 2010. Changing mass attitudes and democratic deepening. Political Research Quarterly63:174-87.
15.
GeddesBarbara. 1999. What do we know about democratization after twenty years?Annual Review of Political Science2:115-44.
16.
GeddesBarbaraZallerJohn. 1989. Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science33:319-47.
17.
GheissariAliNasrVali. 2006. Democracy in Iran: History and quest for liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
GibsonJames L.1998. A sober second thought: An experiment in persuading Russians to tolerate?American Journal of Political Science42:819-50.
19.
GrovesRobert M.1987. Research on survey data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly51:S156-72.
20.
HeathAnthonyFisherStephenSmithShawna. 2005. The globalization of public opinion research. Annual Review of Political Science8:297-333.
21.
HeathAnthonyMartinJeanSpreckelsenThees. 2009. Cross-national comparability of survey attitude measures. International Journal of Public Opinion Research21:293-315.
22.
HofmannSteven Ryan. 2004. Islam and democracy: Micro-level indications of compatibility. Comparative Political Studies37:652-76.
23.
InglehartRonald. 2003. How solid is mass support for democracy—and how can we measure it?PS: Political Science & Politics36:51-57.
24.
JalaeipourHamid. 2003. Religious intellectuals and political action in the reformist movement. In Intellectual trends in twentieth-century Iran: A critical survey, ed. NabaviNegin, 136-46. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
25.
JamalAmaneyTesslerMark. 2008. Attitudes in the Arab world. Journal of Democracy19:97-100.
26.
JelenTed G.WilcoxClyde. 2003. Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly56:489-500.
27.
KamravaMehran. 2008. Iran’s intellectual revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KazemipurAbdolmohammadRezaeiAli. 2003. Religious life under theocracy: The case of Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion42:347-61.
29.
KeddieNikki. 2003. Modern Iran: Roots and results of the revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
KeshavarzianArang. 2007. Bazaar and state in Iran: The politics of the Tehran marketplace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KhosrokhavarFarhad. 2004. The Islamic revolution in Iran: Retrospect after a quarter of a century. Thesis Eleven76:70-84.
33.
KhosrokhavarFarhad. 2007. The new religiosity in Iran. Social Compass54:453-63.
34.
KingGaryMurrayChristopher J. L.SalomonJoshua A.TandonAjay. 2004. Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of survey research. American Political Science Review98:191-207.
35.
KuechlerManfred. 1998. The survey method: An indispensable tool for social science research everywhere?American Behavioral Scientist42:178-200.
36.
KurzmanCharles. 2008. A feminist generation in Iran?Iranian Studies41:297-321.
37.
LiddleR. WilliamMujaniSaiful. 2007. Leadership, party, and religion: Explaining voting behavior in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies40:832-57.
38.
LindeJonasEkmanJoakim. 2003. Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research42:391-408.
39.
MattesRobertBrattonMichael. 2007. Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science51:192-217.
40.
MillerArthur H.HesliVicki L.ReisingerWilliam M.1997. Conceptions of democracy among mass and elite in post-Soviet societies. British Journal of Political Science27:157-90.
41.
NorrisPippa. 1999. Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance, ed. NorrisPippa, 1-30. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
NorrisPippaInglehartRonald. 2004. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
OlsonLaura R.WarberAdam L.2008. Belonging, behaving, and believing: Assessing the role of religion on presidential approval. Political Research Quarterly61:192-204.
44.
PrzeworskiAdamTeuneHenry. 1966. Equivalence in cross-national research. Public Opinion Quarterly30:551-68.
45.
SchedlerAndreasSarsfieldRodolfo. 2007. Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support. European Journal of Political Research46:637-59.
46.
TesslerMark. 2002. Islam and democracy in the Middle East: The Impact of religious orientations on attitudes toward democracy in four Arab countries. Comparative Politics34:337-54.
47.
TezcürGüneş MuratAzadarmakiTaghi. 2008. Religiosity and the Islamic rule in Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion47:211-24.
48.
TezcürGüneş MuratAzadarmakiTaghiBaharMehri. 2006. Religious participation among Muslims: Iranian exceptionalism. Middle Eastern Critique15:217-32.
49.
VahdatFarzin. 2005. Religious modernity in Iran: Dilemmas of Islamic democracy in the discourse of Mohammad Khatami. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East25:650-64.
50.
ZhongYangChenJie. 2002. To vote or not to vote: An analysis of peasants’ participation in Chinese village elections. Comparative Political Studies35:686-712.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
