It is well established that individuals who belong to voluntary associations are more likely to participate in democratic politics. This article examines the possibility that the participation-promoting aspects of America’s nonpolitical voluntary organizations are not experienced equally by all members. Not only are privileged Americans more likely to join nonpolitical voluntary organizations, but they are more likely to benefit from their membership after the point of joining. The participation-promoting benefits of membership accrue disproportionately to white, male, wealthy, and well-educated members, thus reinforcing participatory stratification. Evidence suggests that stratification results from both member and leader choices and behaviors.
Armony, Ariel C.2004. The dubious link: Civic engagement and democratization . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Arrow, Kenneth.1973. The theory of discrimination. In Discrimination in labor markets, ed. Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Rees, 3-3 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Asher, Herbert B., Eric S. Heberlig, Randall B. Ripley, and Karen Snyder.2001. American labor unions in the electoral arena. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
4.
Ayala, Louis J.2000. Trained for democracy: The differing effects of voluntary and involuntary organizations on political participation. Political Research Quarterly53 (March): 99-115.
5.
Becker, Gary.1957. The economics of discrimination. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
6.
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee .1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Blakely, Edward J., and Mary Gail Snyder .1997. Fortress America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
8.
Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman .1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89 (June): 271-94.
9.
Brady, Henry E., Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba.1999. Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review93 (March): 153-68.
10.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba.2001. The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Campbell, Angus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren E. Miller .1954. The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
12.
Charles, Jeffrey A.1993. Service clubs in American society: Rotary, Kiwanis, and Lions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Coate, Stephen, and Glenn Loury.1993. Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes?American Economic Review83 (December): 1220-40.
14.
Djupe, Paul A., Anand Sokhey, and Christopher Gilbert .2007. Present but not accounted for? Gender differences in civic resource acquisition. American Journal of Political Science51 (October): 906-20.
15.
Eastis, Carla M.1998. Organizational diversity and the production of social capital: One of these groups is not like the other. American Behavioral Scientist42 (September): 66-77.
16.
Englehart, Neil A.2006. What makes civil society civil? Lessons from failed states . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia .
17.
Faucheux, Ron.1995. The grassroots explosion. Campaigns and Elections16 (December/January): 20-25, 53-56, 66-67.
18.
Hawkesworth, Mary.2003. Congressional enactments of racegender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review97 (November): 529-50.
19.
Heberlig, Eric S.1996. The bias of mobilization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association , Atlanta, GA.
20.
Hyman, Herbert H., and Charles R. Wright .1971. Trends in voluntary association membership of American adults: Replication based on secondary analysis of national sample surveys. American Sociological Review36 (April): 191-206.
21.
Kennedy, David J.1995. Residential associations as state actors: Regulating the impact of gated communities on non-members. Yale Law Journal105 (December): 761-93.
22.
Leighley, Jan E.1996. Group membership and the mobilization of political participation . Journal of Politics58 (May): 447-63.
23.
Levitt, Stephen D.2003. Testing theories of discrimination: Evidence from "Weakest Link." Working Paper W9449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
24.
Low, Setha M.2001. The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourses of urban fear. American Anthropologist103 (March): 45-58.
25.
MacLeod, David I.1983. Building character in the American boy: The Boy Scouts, YMCA, and their forerunners 1870-1920. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
26.
Mechling, Jay.2001. On my honor: Boy Scouts and the making of American youth . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Milbrath, Lester W.1965. Political participation. Chicago : Rand McNally.
28.
Newton, Kenneth.1997. Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist40 (March): 575-86.
29.
Phelps, E.1972. A statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review62 (September): 659-61.
30.
Pollock, Philip H., III.1982. Organizations as agents of mobilization: How does group activity affect political participation?American Journal of Political Science26 (August): 485-503.
31.
Putnam, Robert.1994. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
---. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon and Schuster .
33.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen .1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
34.
Schier, Steven E.2000. By invitation only: The rise of exclusive politics in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
35.
Schlozman, Kay Lehmann.1984. What accent the heavenly chorus? Political equality and the American pressure system. Journal of Politics46 (November): 1006-32.
36.
Schlozman, Kay Lehmann, and John T. Tierney .1986. Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
37.
Skocpol, Theda.2003. Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
38.
Stolle, Dietlind, and Thomas R. Rochon .1998. Are all associations alike?American Behavioral Scientist42 (September): 47-65.
39.
Strolovitch, Dara Z.2006. Do interest groups represent the disadvantaged? Advocacy at the intersections of race, class, and gender. Journal of Politics68 (November): 893-980.
40.
---. 2007. Affirmative advocacy: race, class, and gender in interest group politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie .1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper and Row.
42.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady .1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry E. Brady, and Norman Nie.1995. American Citizen Participation Study, 1990 (computer file). ICPSR version. Chicago: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center (NORC) . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, distributors.
44.
Wolfinger, Raymond, and Steven J. Rosenstone .1980. Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
