In this article, the authors develop a model in which they depict individuals’ support for same-sex marriage as a function of several clusters of independent variables, including symbolic politics, moral and religious attitudes and attachments, feelings toward gays and lesbians, women’s rights and gender roles, concern for minority and civil rights, demographic attributes, and the local context. Using data from the 2004 American National Election Studies survey and the U.S. Census, the authors find that attitudes toward same-sex marriage are a function of moral and religious considerations, attitudes toward gays and lesbians, and gender roles. They find little evidence that attitudes toward women’s rights and civil rights for African Americans affect attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Finally, they find that contextual effects are limited only to those respondents who reside in counties with a very high percentage of same-sex partnered couples.
American National Election Studies (ANES).2000. The 2000 American National Election Study [dataset]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. Available at http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/download/datacenter_all.htm.
2.
American National Election Studies (ANES).2004. The 2004 American National Election Study [dataset]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. Available at http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/download/datacenter_all.htm.
3.
Amir Y.1976. The role of intergroup contact in change or prejudice and ethnic relations. In Towards the elimination of racism , ed. P. A. Katz, 245-308. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
4.
Barth, Jay, L. Marvin Overby, and Scott Huffman. Forthcoming. Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly62.
5.
Bergeron, Joe.2005. Examining determinants of American support for same-sex marriage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1-4.
6.
Bolce, Louis, and Gerald De Maio.1999. The anti-Christian fundamentalist factor in contemporary politics. Public Opinion Quarterly63:508-42.
7.
Bolce, Louis, and Gerald De Maio.2008. A prejudice for the thinking classes: Media exposure, political sophistication, and the anti-Christian fundamentalist . American Politics Research36:155-85.
8.
Brewer, Paul R.2003. The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights . Journal of Politics65 (4): 1208-20.
9.
Brewer, Paul R.2005. From the podium and the pulpit: Opinion leadership and same-sex marriage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1-4.
10.
Campbell, David, and Carin Larson.2007. Religious coalitions for and against gay marriage: The culture war wages on. In The politics of same-sex marriage, ed. Craig Rimmerman and Clyde Wilcox, 131-54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Campbell, David, and Joseph Quin Monson .2005. The religion card: Evangelicals, Catholics, and gay marriage in the 2004 presidential election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1-4.
12.
Craig, Stephen C., Michael D. Martinez, James G. Kane, and Jason Gainous.2005. Core values, value conflict, and citizens’ ambivalence about gay rights. Political Research Quarterly58 (1): 5-17.
13.
Egan, Patrick J., and Kenneth Sherrill .2005. Marriage and the shifting priorities of a new generation of lesbians and gays. PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 229-32.
14.
Eskridge, William N.2002. Equality practice: Civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York: Routledge.
15.
Ettelbrick, Paula.1997. Since when is marriage a path to liberation? In We are everywhere: A historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics, ed. Mark Blasius and Shan Phelan,757-61. New York: Routledge .
16.
Gates, Gary J., and Jason Ost.2004. Gay and lesbian atlas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17.
Gerstmann, Evan.1999. The constitutional underclass: Gays, lesbians, and the failure of class-based equal protection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Gerstmann, Evan.2004. Same-sex marriage and the constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Gerstmann, Evan.2005. Litigating same-sex marriage: Might the courts actually be bastions of rationality? PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 217-9.
20.
Giles, Michael W.1977. Recent black and racial hostility: An old assumption revisited . Social Science Quarterly58:412-7.
21.
Giles, Michael W., and Melanie A. Buckner .1993. David Duke and black threat: An old hypothesis revisited. Journal of Politics55:702-13.
22.
Giles, Michael, and Arthur Evans.1985. External threat, perceived threat, and group identity. Social Science Quarterly66:50-66.
23.
Giles, Micheal W., and Kaenan Hertz.1994. Racial threat and partisan identification . American Political Science Review88:317-26.
24.
Glaser, James.1994. Back to the black belt: Racial environment and white racial attitudes in the South. Journal of Politics56:21-41.
25.
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Mark R. Joslyn. 2005. Attributions and the regulation of marriage: Considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 233-9.
26.
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier .1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics58 (2): 332-49.
27.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Todd G. Shields .2005. Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 201-8.
28.
Josephson, Jyl.2005. Citizenship, same-sex marriage, and feminist critiques of marriage. Perspectives on Politics3 (2): 269-84.
29.
Kaplan, Morris.1997. Intimacy and equality: The question of lesbian and gay marriage. In Playing with fire: Queer politics, queer theories, ed. Shane Phelan, 201-30. New York: Routledge.
30.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., and John C. Green .1993. Knowing God’s many people: Denominational preferences and political behavior. In Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics, ed. David Leege and Lyman A. Kellstedt, 53-71. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
31.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., John C. Green, James L. Guth, and Cor-win E. Smidt .1997. Is there a culture war? Religion and the 1996 election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 28-31.
32.
Kersch, Ken I.1997. Full faith and credit for same-sex marriages?Political Science Quarterly112 (1): 117-36.
33.
Lewis, Gregory B.2005. Same-sex marriage and the 2004 presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 195-9.
34.
Liu, Frederick, and Stephen Macedo.2005. The Federal Marriage Amendment and the strange evolution of the conservative case against gay marriage. PS: Political Science and Politics38 (2): 211-5.
35.
Long, J. Scott.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
36.
Martinez, Michael, Kenneth Wald, and Stephen Craig.2006. Homophobic innumeracy: Estimating the size of the gay and lesbian population. Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 31-September 3.
37.
Osunsami, Steve.2004. Are gay rights civil rights?ABC News , March 12. www.abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/US/same_sex_marriage_movement_040312.html. Accessed on April 6, 2006.
38.
Overby, L. Marvin, and Jay Barth.2002. Contact, community context, and public attitudes toward gays and lesbians. Polity34:433-56.
39.
Overby, L. Marvin, and Jay Barth.2006. Numeracy about minority populations: Americans’ estimates of local gay population size. Polity38:194-210.
40.
Pettigrew, T.F.1986. The contact hypothesis revisited. In Contact and conflict in intergroup encountership, ed. M. Hew-stone and R. Brown, 169-95. Oxford , UK: Basil Blackwell.
41.
Pettigrew, T.F.1997. Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23:173-85.
42.
Powers, Daniel A., and Christopher G. Ellison.1995. Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces74:205-26.
43.
Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk .1990. Self-interest in Americans’ political opinions. In Beyond self-interest, ed. Jane Mansbridge, 147-70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Sears, David O., Carl P. Hensler, and Leslie K. Speer .1979. Whites’ opposition to "busing": Self-interest or symbolic politics?American Political Science Review73:369-84.
45.
Sears, David O., Richard R. Lau, Tom R. Tyler, and Harris M. Allen Jr.1980. Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review74:670-84.
46.
Sherrill, Kenneth.1996. The political power of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals. PS: Political Science and Politics29 (3): 469-73.
47.
Stoddard, Tom.1997. Why gay people should seek the right to marry. In We are everywhere: A historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics , ed. Mark Blasius and Shan Phelan, 753-6. New York: Routledge.
48.
Tadlock, Barry L., C. Ann Gordon, and Elizabeth Popp.2007. Framing the issue of same-sex marriage . In The politics of same-sex marriage, ed. Craig A. Rimmerman and Clyde Wilcox, 193-214. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Tolbert, Caroline, Todd Donovan, and Daniel Smith.2005. Do state-level ballot measures affect presidential elections? Gay marriage and the 2004 election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1-4.
50.
U.S. Census Bureau.2000. "Table PCT14, Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data: Unmarried-Partner Households by Sex of Partners." Available for download at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DCGeoSelectServlet?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U .
51.
Voss, D. Stephen.1996. Beyond racial threat: Failure of an old hypothesis in the New South. Journal of Politics58: 1156-70.
52.
Voss, D. Stephen.2000. Familiarity doesn’t breed contempt: The political geography of racial polarization. PhD diss., Department of Government, Harvard University.
53.
Wilcox, Clyde, Paul R. Brewer, Shauna Shames, and Celinda Lake.2007. If I bend this far I will break? Public opinion about same-sex marriage. In The politics of same-sex marriage, ed. Craig A. Rimmerman and Clyde Wilcox, 215-42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
